Drones over gatwick..

Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2011
Posts
21,615
Location
ST4
It's most likely to be some div parked up in a van with a couple of drones in the back. That means he can move around to a different location each time, isn't sat out in the elements and one drone can be charging whilst the other is causing chaos.

Although I will call it now, the moment he's caught he'll claim Aspergers or autism made him do it..
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
4,655
Location
The Darkside
Just been confirmed that armed response units have been given permission now to shoot the drone down and they have yet to discover what type and manufacture the drone is.

Shocking
 
Permabanned
Joined
3 Nov 2018
Posts
708
Location
The other side of The Gap
Well OBVIOUSLY it's Luton airport trying to shut down the competition.
It's most likely to be some div parked up in a van with a couple of drones in the back. That means he can move around to a different location each time, isn't sat out in the elements and one drone can be charging whilst the other is causing chaos.


Heard an "aviation expert" on CH4 News saying it's possible there's a few drones all programmed to automatically land at charging bases out of area of the pilot.

I have no idea of the feasibility.
 
Soldato
Joined
31 Oct 2004
Posts
8,655
Location
London
Alright guys i'm not one for conspiracy theorist crap but wtf is going on? No way this is a simple drone for Gatwick to still be down and Army called in. Battery life on these things isn't bloody 12 > 24 hours.... Something isn't right with this bs story.

What makes you think it's a single drone flying for 12-24 hours? It's obviously either one drone landing with replaceable batteries or a single drone with fast charging batteries. It's not been flying continuously, it vanishes for a while then comes back.
 
Permabanned
Joined
3 Nov 2018
Posts
708
Location
The other side of The Gap
It's all part of a test phase for the (non existent) Brexit plan to use " customs technology". The plan is to use drones to halt all traffic be it air, sea or land using drones.

Wait until you see the size of the tanks drones they have to stop traffic on the roads at Dover.
 
Commissario
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
33,118
Location
Panting like a fiend
There was a news item on earlier that showed a jammer manufacturer who displayed a jammer in operation. It only affected the drone & would only require 2 units for the size of Gatwick (3 for Heathrow)
IIRC it is only designed to affect drones using certain frequencies.

It won't do anything for drones that are pre-programmed, drones that use things like mobile phone frequencies, drones that use non standard frequencies.

So it basically won't stop anything other than the cheaper off the shelf models as the more expensive and custom ones tend to have things "auto pilot" functions or GSM comms, and auto pilot based on GPS can't be blocked at an airport without the side effect of you know, shutting the airport down, whilst blocking mobile phone frequencies is not going to happen because those are needed for everyone from the general public, to the site security and service staff to the police (whose "radios" IIRC are now basically mobile phone based).

Even for those frequencies it does work on it may not have approval for use in the UK in general, let alone around airports (as the frequencies drones use tend to be ones allowed to be used by other devices)

There is no simple, safe and effective way to stop drones from something as large as an airport's airspace, as you need active measures to deal with them and that basically means enough staff/equipment to cover some very large areas and get to any point in that area in seconds/minutes with the deployed counter measure otherwise the drone can just disappear again (so potentially dozens/hundreds of "counter measure" drones placed not just at the perimeter but at various points so no part of the airport is more than say 30 seconds from one regardless of if it's the perimeter or the middle of the runway).
Even smaller areas like Prisons have problems with stopping them, and they at least have the option of putting netting up over the main parts of the facility.
 
Soldato
Joined
10 Aug 2006
Posts
5,207
The whole thing is obviously very well planned out. The person who has done this may have been planning this for months. The whole thing is very calculated. I don't think for one second it has been as simple as what people have made out. But what is evidently shocking is how poorly equipped we have been to deal with this, and how slow we have been to react in terms of consulting the army when having failed to do anything over such a long period of time.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Mar 2011
Posts
4,908
Drones are too small for radar.

2.8ghz to 5.8ghz block and they or the one drone would be out of commission in seconds.

The whole story stinks to high heaven. Yes I have lots of tinfoil but am not having it.
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,934
There is no simple, safe and effective way to stop drones from something as large as an airport's airspace, as you need active measures to deal with them and that basically means enough staff/equipment to cover some very large areas and get to any point in that area in seconds/minutes with the deployed counter measure otherwise the drone can just disappear again (so potentially dozens/hundreds of "counter measure" drones placed not just at the perimeter but at various points so no part of the airport is more than say 30 seconds from one regardless of if it's the perimeter or the middle of the runway).

That is a bit excessive tbh... some countermeasures deployed in a vehicle might well have been sufficient to deal with the current issue (IF it is indeed a remotely controlled drone). Sure you'd have some initial disruption when the drone first appears but beyond that you'd hopefully be able to take it down.

You are of course right to point out that there are drones that could be flying some automated flight path etc... AFAIK there might still be some electronic countermeasures that could be useful there but not quite so simple as just "jamming" a single so the operator loses control.
 
Commissario
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
33,118
Location
Panting like a fiend
If true then our security forces are ******* incompetent.
Why, because they can't put 1000's of officers in an airport and get full eyes on coverage constantly even in poor light/the dark?

If the person operating the drone has thought it through they'll be programming it to move somewhere, pop up, move, drop down and move to a collection point, and be changing at least some if not all of those variables every time (and if reasonably smart they'll be watching the police/security operation so can move the drone to less well covered areas).

I think you're underestimate the size of the airport and the scope of the issue.
 
Soldato
Joined
2 Jan 2005
Posts
8,450
Location
leeds
Drones are too small for radar.

2.8ghz to 5.8ghz block and they or the one drone would be out of commission in seconds.

The whole story stinks to high heaven. Yes I have lots of tinfoil but am not having it.

its not that difficult to make a drone run on a non-standard frequency - tracking and blocking would be very difficult - there are a lot of frequencies!
 
Back
Top Bottom