Reading is hard I see. The other poster said tax cuts would just be pocketed by the companies and I was arguing against that.
No, it's quite easy. Hagar was talking about the Fuel Duty cut not being passed on and companies pocketing the difference, you were the one who then equated that to the same scenario as an Income Tax cut and companies pocketing the difference, when they are not comparable situations at all as it doesn't work the same wiith Income Tax as it does with Fuel Duty, as I've explained.
You have also misunderstood the proposition which is; employees would be willing to accept lower gross salaries with lower income tax because their net salary would remain the same and therefore employers would offer lower gross salaries in response to reduce their costs. Not how it works in reality though.
Quite, which is why it's nonsense as it doesn't happen IRL. Anyway, it's irrelevant and OT, so back to moaning about high energy costs