Man of Honour
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 45,792
Lifted the ban on fracking...
Good, we never should have stopped fracking and North Sea exploration and expansion.
Lifted the ban on fracking...
It's also dirty, contaminates water supplies, uses huge amounts of water and has high carbon emissions. What's not to like?!Correct me if I’m wrong but I think fracking is one the quickest ways for us to increase the amount of energy available.
The non-PC answer is that basically it's because a huge portion of the population is too thick to work it if they were given actual useful figures
Good, we never should have stopped fracking and North Sea exploration and expansion.
I know people who were paying more than £2500/year before these rises, is that a hard cap on everything or are there caveats?
it is terrible news imo................ solar farms getting planning permission refused at the same time as greenlighting frakking - something that just weeks ago kwarteng himself said was absolutely the wrong thing to do.Correct me if I’m wrong but I think fracking is one the quickest ways for us to increase the amount of energy available.
It pretty much was the only alternative. Got to let Truss do this plan and see if it works. If it doesn't vote her out next time. Its been a day, got to give it a chance.yea cos that was the only alternative
as long as millionaires can heat their swimming pools for the same price as a poor person can heat their home though
This is true.Vladimir Putin is doing more for the future of the human race and global warming than green levies and using other people's gas instead of our own has ever done. He's going to get a Nobel Prize for accidental humanitarian genius eventually. Hopefully posthumously.
I'd have hoped it was a condition of the free money from government that all exit fees are voided.
I know people who were paying more than £2500/year before these rises, is that a hard cap on everything or are there caveats?
Or the fact that the energy companies obscure figures making it hard to work out
I know people who were paying more than £2500/year before these rises, is that a hard cap on everything or are there caveats?
The £2,500 price cap is for 'typical use'.
Typical use is :
- 2,900 kWh of electricity
- 12,000 kWh of gas
I assume typical =median?
I assume typical =median?
It's a good price point for a cap I feel.
I do not agree with
-lowering taxes (benefits rich most)
-method of cap (benefits rich/high users) most
-cap is being paid for by us effectively.
So its 2 years? This seems redundant? If prices are still high then it has to continue surely?
In draft proposals seen by the Financial Times, the European Commission recommends governments impose a levy on revenues generated by non-gas electricity producers when market prices exceed €200/MWh. The current spot price for electricity in Germany, the regional benchmark, is above €450/MWh. Excess revenues would be redistributed to help companies and households.
Surely if there is a cap that is ultimately paid for by tax payers, then the "rich" (or what you perceive to be rich ie 40/45% tax payers) will be paying disproportionately more back for it ? So actually your goal of the "rich" supporting the poor is actually happening?