And the present is that he got annoyed and banged wheels with Hamilton at slow speed and that he hasn't made such a move before. To say he lost it and had no control at all over the situation is a little narrow minded - if he was so annoyed that he lost all control he would have taken himself and Hamilton out of the race (and would certainly be disqualified).Losing control of yourself in an F1 car is inherently very unsafe not just for him but the other drivers, you can point to his history but what matters is the present and future.
Good article and I'm glad they are looking into it, I thought it was done and dusted. I didn't know it could go to a tribunal.
Other media people are trying to play it well down now while during the race I'm fairly sure different viewpoints were being given. For me though the point stands that, if the second part never happened, Vettel would have been punished for hitting Hamilton from behind under a safety car anyway, for which he wasn't actually punished.
Public back lash shouldn't have any effect on the penalty, since we don't decide the penalties.I can see Vet having his points stripped from the last race. Lots of public back lash with the way he acted and his comments afterwards. To go without further punishment would be like an open door for others to act the same.