Wouldn't surprise me at all. Maybe the Cons realise how toxic the DUP tie up could be.Also, has Farron just opened the gates for a lib/con coalition?
Dispose of May and create a coalition with a second EU referendum as the bargaining chip?
LD would potentially provide a sane counterbalance to May's authoritarian tendencies.
Who knows what skullduggery is going on. You couldn't write this stuff.
So what is it about his faith that is not reconcilable with being a politician?
LD would potentially provide a sane counterbalance to May's authoritarian tendencies.
Who knows what skullduggery is going on. You couldn't write this stuff.
So... This is why I will never ever ever in a million years vote conservative. They may have a decent manifesto every 20 years (if we are lucky) But the underlying foundations of the party are people this.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/81...gg-heated-TV-row-Theresa-May-Conservative-DUP
Rees-Mogg is spot on there, media trying to generate hysteria about the election result. Oh and least Rees-Mogg can speak English, unlike Kier Starmer in that interview who seemed unable to pronounce the word "mess" lol.So... This is why I will never ever ever in a million years vote conservative. They may have a decent manifesto every 20 years (if we are lucky) But the underlying foundations of the party are people this.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/81...gg-heated-TV-row-Theresa-May-Conservative-DUP
Seems like there's now a faith-test before you can become a party political leader in the UK now.So what is it about his faith that is not reconcilable with being a politician?
Except he's seemingly able to keep one thing separate from the other, so is a bit unfair for him to be mistreated over it the way he is.Tim Farron looks like a decent politician...
aaaaands he's a religious nut job.
Its got nothing to do with being posh, it is his pompous attitude that has no place in politics.so you treat it like supporting a football team because this team has a posh sounding bloke in the line up?
Its got nothing to do with being posh, it is his pompous attitude that has no place in politics.
Except he's seemingly able to keep one thing separate from the other, so is a bit unfair for him to be mistreated over it the way he is.
JRM is doubtless very intelligent and well spoken, but he's not a man for this century. He belongs about 200 years ago.Rees-Mogg is spot on there, media trying to generate hysteria about the election result. Oh and least Rees-Mogg can speak English, unlike Kier Starmer in that interview who seemed unable to pronounce the word "mess" lol.
I thought his position was pretty reasonable for someone who is religious, but people saw it as a thread to pull on
Vince Cable would be a good choice, although Murdoch wont like it (so maybe that makes it even better)
Wow! Rees-Mogg comes across as so arrogant there.So... This is why I will never ever ever in a million years vote conservative. They may have a decent manifesto every 20 years (if we are lucky) But the underlying foundations of the party are people this.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/81...gg-heated-TV-row-Theresa-May-Conservative-DUP
My feeling too. Perhaps to do with his perceived beliefs overshadowing the party as a whole.
I think Cable would be the best bet too. He has experience, seems very good and he also has exposure - he's well known- which for a leader today is useful.
ehh,same argument then but switch in attitude for posh...
(not exactly sure what was wrong with his attitude in that instance - he basically pointed out that the media are going a bit overboard re: this election result)
pomp·ous
ˈpämpəs/
adjective
adjective: pompous
affectedly and irritatingly grand, solemn, or self-important.
"a pompous ass who pretends he knows everything"
ehh,
Not posh, just an irritating self-absorbed arrogant idiot lying through his teeth.