I'm not the spokesperson for all net contributors.
Poll: Exit Poll: UK General Election 2017 - Results discussion and OcUK Exit Poll - Closing 8th July
- Thread starter JohnnyG
- Start date
- Status
I'm not the spokesperson for all net contributors.
The Tories are dumping that.
Who cares?
And why assume I have a search history available to google, facebook, or our government, my first use of the web was in 94, I have a fairly good working knowledge of any realistic methods for tracking my personal data and that knowledge is hardly locked in a special room only a few know about.
That said my biggest embarrassment (aside from obvious aforementioned amount of time on OCuk) is DanTDM and PoppularMMOs against my youtube account
Pro "soft brexit" They will not stand for a hard border between NI and Eire or between NI and the mainland.
Exactly.
Caporegime
No, obviously not, but you apparently have at least one opinion, in this case about wifi of all things. I was hoping you might have more opinions, or perhaps might be able to rationally empathise with the thoughts of others in your apparent peer group, but maybe not.
No there is the third option, stay in the EU.
Caporegime
Government reach should be justified. We shouldn't need to come up with a compelling reason for the government to not know something about us.
Where where does it say that?
It doesnt. But if there is a referendum on the final deal the choices isnt just accept the deal (good or bad) or jump off the cliff into WTO. You can just stay in the EU and rescind A50.
How does that support your argument.
Clearly organisations like google/facebook and our government don't care about individual usage (despite claiming the data is recorded to capture specific terrorist individuals), but they can all see the value to them in that aggregate behaviour data, this is not even debatable, why spend billions on massive datasets of user behaviour if has no value to you?
Anyone in the face of the total lack of oversight and a string of issues involving electoral legal wrong doing who after having this clearly explained to them, then drops back to some plebeian point about "nothing to hide nothing to fear", is so under qualified to speak about the issues, they really shouldn't bother.
So how do you know that all the people that voted in the poll knew or thought that? You don't - so the poll is worthless.
Haha we all bow to your 'qualifications'.
I just don't care for all these conspiracy theories.
We know 48% of people voted to keep freedom of movement and everything that went with being in the EU, brexit to WTO is a fringe position with virtually zero chance of winning a second vote!
What poll? You were talking about a referendum on the final deal means accept the deal or no deal. I just pointed out there is a third option. Nothing to do with the poll. Who knows who will be in government by then anyway.
Soldato
Spaces on the Labour frontbench then. Wonder if we'll see a return for Ed Miliband.
80% of people voted for one of the two main parties. That's all we can draw from that.
Even if you want to argue that the vote would only entail take the deal or leave with no deal (you haven't provided any detail as to why you think that would be the case, yet you're so sure of it) the rest of the data points to two thirds of the population wanting neither no deal, or hard Brexit.
As you've also been told the Conservatives are being propped up by a "soft" Brexit party that are not going to vote for anything that is going to impact the free movement of people between the UK and Ireland. There is no way this government is going to stay in long if May and Davis continue to push towards a hard Brexit.
Government infighting is already starting, with a number of senior ministers going against the current "hard Brexit" policy and advocating soft Brexit (Hammond for example).
Worst conspiracy ever, so upfront all but a moron can see without oversight national behavioural data poses a conflict of interest problem!
Read back through the last page.
We get it's important to you.
- Status