Sounds like an easy fix, do they have enough money for a private test, to claw back some time.
They haven't eluded to what the problem is so how can one determine that it is an easy fix?
Sounds like an easy fix, do they have enough money for a private test, to claw back some time.
An interesting comment on Mercedes:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/andrewbenson/2012/02/pressure_mounts_on_mercedes.html
Arknor, why is it that you have an RBR sig...why not Mercedes?
The fact they know what it is and it will be fixed by next week. That's an easy fix in anyone's book.
supose its better than something like this maybe happening
Ouch...
Who was driving?
Sounds like an easy fix, do they have enough money for a private test, to claw back some time.
someo rich idiot who bought a ferrari and probably welded the ends backtogether
someo rich idiot who bought a ferrari and probably welded the ends backtogether
Broke at a bulkhead, possibly modified to fit him in as he's a tall chap.
More worryingly, it was a low speed impact that did that.
There’s a lot of speculation about exactly what happened to this 1999-spec Ferrari F399. What is known is that it was driven by Dutchman Federico Kroymans in a demonstration event at Laguna Seca in California five years ago. He crashed at turn six and went into the barriers at around 66mph (106kph).
Any F1 fan who’s seen the picture will be astonished by how a comparatively low-speed impact did such serious damage to a relatively recent car.
Did the car have some pre-existing damage to the chassis that was not repaired? There was speculation that the chassis might be the same one Michael Schumacher crashed at Silverstone in 1999, breaking his leg.
But this seems unlikely. There is another suggestion that Kroymans made modifications to the car himself in order to accommodate his tall frame (which is clearly evident in this picture). This could have weakened the car’s ability to withstand impacts.
I think it's part of the BBC style guide, the way most of their sports articles read - very few quotes, nothing new to learn, anything remotely resembling an opinion must be immediately balanced by considering the alternate view. Just state the well-known facts and get out of there.Bensons blog posts for some reason just seem really rubbish. Never really insightful, never a scoop just news for the sake of news.
McLaren had good long run pace last year. It means nothing if Vettel is already 20 seconds up the road...
It would also be good to see who's fastest in a straight line.