I actually found Fallout 3 was better, as NV is really just more of the same in a new place from what I could tell.
agreed fallout 3 was better, i just hope fallout 4 will follow on from that story and style of gameplay, i've heard it's going to be set in Boston (M.I.T. land
) and is a follow on from f3 so we'll see
IMO NV felt empty and the strip was a big let down and not that hard to get to i got there around level 10 on my 2nd play through and once there the game is half over, i know there are short cuts in f3 but with f3 i always i felt like i wanted to play the story the right way.... well with the exception of doing operation anchorage so i could get the shock sward and winterised power armour
i must say mods help NV become more playable and add quite a bit to the experience but still prefer the Washington city and wasteland experience vs the desert wasteland
i also think that fallout 3 had a better story and made you feel more part of the story being as you grow up through the game where as you just happen to wake up from a 10mm to the head
don't get me wrong i enjoyed NV and have clocked over 1000 hours playing between the 360 version first then when a good number of mods were i switched to the pc and as long as they don't try anything crazy with 4 and change everything or even worse remove modding tools i will play 4 and any other that follow, a new updated/ less buggy free engine would be nice as would having it optimised properly for the pc
TBH i haven't played much of the older games as turn based isn't my thing but the little i did play didn't feel like fallout 3 or NV as they are FPS/RPG games,
IMHO i would like to see a remake of the old ones but in the new style RPG/FPS i know the people that really love the old ones and don't really like the currant games but it's the only way i will ever get experience the full back story as f3 and nv are already in my top 5 games of all time