Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yup my bad, been messing with the settings lately to get my fps up a little at 1440p (3060Ti atm) and must have been something I dropped down too far. Switched it to Ultra and not seen the issue, and tbh no way I can go back now this is *such* a good looking game still!
Now Techpowerup has a Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition FSR 2.0 Community Patch review up.
Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition: FSR 2.0 Community Patch Review
Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition recently got support for AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 through a community mod. The addon converts the officially supported DLSS render path into instructions the AMD FSR 2.0 algorithm understands, and results are excellent.www.techpowerup.com
Ignoring FSR for a minute, I like what AMD has done here. They are really trying to work with software companies and not just throwing their cards over the fence.An AMD software development engineer showcased himself putting in FSR2 into a game in roughly an hour, Pretty cool, Now if only CDPR would put FSR2 into Cybperpunk and Ubisoft put it into AC:Valhalla
Watch this AMD dev code FSR 2.0 into a game engine from scratch in under an hour
"You realise what just happened? FSR 2 just worked like that. That's insane."www.pcgamer.com
www.reddit.com
Yep - ideally we'd just have an 'Upscaling' drop-down that allows gamers to pick XeSS, FSR, DLSS or TAAU - much like we used to have with different AA solutions.
the point of Streamline is to keep DLSS valid to run alongside the open source upscalers IF/WHEN Devs decide there's no point in supporting a ring fenced upscaling tech-when they can run it on everything.
Besides being disingenuous that it's AMD users comments
Again, Nv never ever recommend turning on FSR in GFE experience on games/hardware that doesn't support DLSS, don't see any moaning about that, so what's the difference?
There is a bit of a difference between that scenario and streamline too....Looks like amd won't have a say in the matter anyway and if they try to block it, well there goes their brand image of being the good guys for the open gaming industry.
That’s exactly the purpose for it, Tommy.Besides being disingenuous that it's AMD users comments
Again, Nv never ever recommend turning on FSR in GFE experience on games/hardware that doesn't support DLSS, don't see any moaning about that, so what's the difference?
That's the way I see it, Devs can integrate FSR-which they are at a higher uptake rate than DLSS has seen, therefore it must be easy enough or no one would be adding it to their titles.
So you agree this is all about amd doing what's in their interests i.e. to support only their brand? And not do what would actually be best for the industry overall as they keep reiterating with their open source solutions i.e. giving gamers choice to what they can use and making the developers life easier? Obviously since you work for amd, you will stick with amds stance here and that's perfectly fine but do you not see why various people are pointing out how Nick/AMD are completely contradicting themselves here?
That's the way I see it, Devs can integrate FSR-which they are at a higher uptake rate than DLSS has seen.
Nv don't recommend enabling FSR at all whether Nexus wants to skip past the reason that Nv don't want their users using FSR, anyone over the age of reading knows why-they want them to upgrade to DLSS capable hardware.
Hopefully upscalings going to be integrated into DX at some point and stops the whole kids writing garbage and these threads can be informative instead of unwanted negativity.
