• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Fidelity Super Resolution in 2021

Poneros said:
Just tried it (and I love this game btw!) and am VERY impressed with the performance. On a 6800 all max at 4K, without FSR but with VRS it can't lock 60 fps at all AND uses >200w (chip). With FSR UQ it's 100% rock solid 60 fps and at only 100w... :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: Will have to do more testing esp. at night time, this was just a quick glimpse. Forgot to say, quality wise it's very close to 4K native but you can definitely notice the lack of that "4K sheen" as I call it, but it's not a big loss at all. Without back and forth switching no one would care about the difference.

Saw also that Hello Games pledged to FSR, so look forward to that in No Man's Sky, already played that with "only" 75% reso scaling because of useless pure 4K was there so should be a good candidate for sure.

Back to Riftbreaker now..

ZUE2SYW.gif
Click to expand...
i will be honest, graphics kinda impressed me in this game

not my cup of tea but rt shadows add a lot
 
LtMatt said:
Press and user feedback from gamers having tried it is very positive - looking at reviews, forums and Reddit. It's nice to see and just the start for FSR. :)
Click to expand...

Yeah the feedback was amazing i was expecting a disaster for AMD, as it usually happens. :D
Minimal resources/maximum feedback.
 
Yeah I can confirm that at 4K it works great but for those hoping to extend life of their old cards running at 1080p you might as well forget about it as it looks awful (but so does DLSS)…
 
it works ok enough to warrant performance increase with ultra quality mode at 1080p

not impressive, but not a failure either

similar to DLSS (dlss being better, objectively). dlss is nowhere near awful at 1080p, it just needs a sharpening touch in games where its not present (cyberpunk being the worst offender). FSR for example the biggest saving grace is probably its sharpening component. it all comes down to sharpening in the end to make things more bareable at lower resolutions and that's how it goes sadly

i would say dlss quality (internal 720p) is better than the image quality of fsr ultra quality (internal 831p). now its time for nvidia to provide ultra dlss quality or even native dlss to provide smaller steps in downgrading resolutions (900p internal to 1080p for example).

you can achieve that with DSR somewhat, but then the cost of DLSS increases (dlss costs more frames at 1440p and more at 4k)
 
Zarax said:
I might be in the unpopular side but I see 4k as lots of power required of little benefit.
I game on an old but good 24" from Asus (which was one of the best monitors in 2012) so 1080p is plenty good.

What I noticed on larger screens is that panel quality seems to matter a lot more than pixel density: an 80€ benq 27" looks more pixelated than a 170€ curved Samsung monitor, both at 1080p...
Click to expand...


Lol, you never seen 4k or VRR, high hz, high resolution, ultrawide or probably IPS / VA. There's been a lot of progress in nearly 10 years. 27 inch @ 1080p will look awful - that's why people go at least 2560x1440 minimum for starters.
 
If those on old cards and on 1080p cant they just use dsr/vsr to play in 1440p or better and use the presets, would look better since its been fed more pixels than lower native res option?
 
D.P. said:
Yes it is, https://gpuopen.com/fidelityfx-superresolution/ read and learn something.

The filtering ensures the up-scaling and and sharpening enhances the perceived edge sharpness, which is pretty much what CAS does.


Overall, it does a good job and is well tuned. I am just disapointed AMd didn't push any new technology. A really good TSR implementation would have been fantastic
Click to expand...
I'm fairness some of AMD recent tech is barely being used and is good
 
nvidiamd said:
Yeah the feedback was amazing i was expecting a disaster for AMD, as it usually happens. :D
Minimal resources/maximum feedback.
Click to expand...
Judging by the minimal presence of certain posters and people arguing about the lack of AI in its implementation and strangely enough not talking about what actually matters (quality and FPS ) it seems like it was a success.

Well I got all this popcorn for nothing.
 
Chuk_Chuk said:
Judging by the minimal presence of certain posters and people arguing about the lack of AI in its implementation and strangely enough not talking about what actually matters (quality and FPS ) it seems like it was a success.

Well I got all this popcorn for nothing.
Click to expand...
I was looking forward to my salted popcorn as well. :p

EDIT

I see you got a bite. :D
 
Facts here is not long ago people here was question if AMD would ever complete again against nvidia.
Move forward less then a year and now we comparing software features :cry:

Amd have went from nothing to beating and competing while also doing it with less power that is the big one here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom