Are you going to try and squirm your way out?
That is potentially a big waste of time
so thats a yes then, you get called out and you run for the hills
Are you going to try and squirm your way out?
That is potentially a big waste of time
so thats a yes then, you get called out and you run for the hills
provide proof of the claims you made in post 1848 .lets start there
we dont need to have a conversation about anything else, im really not into that ASL stuff youre wanting to do
and the rest or have you suddenly forgot about them?
But if you were to say include, invading neighbouring states
remove neighboring and see if military bases and exclusive zones is not the same thing. Equally I could say to you that with Crimea, people have a right to self determination. I value tha. Some people don't because they get told no.annexing territory of neighbouring states
abducting border guards from neighbouring states
using a radioactive weapon
in the middle of a major capital city in an assassination
using nerve agent as a weapon in an assassination attempt
killing journalists who write critical articles about the state
shooting down a civilian airliner then actively trying to cover it up/deny it ever happened....
Well you can't really say the same about the UK, US, France etc...
This is the brick wall moment. I am fine saying Russia do bad things. All the things I say here. But I can be open enough to admit the same from the UK.
You have no equivalent of either the UK or US using a radioactive isotope as a weapon or a nerve agent, in the middle of a city, for a targeted assassination/to send a message.
You can't say that yet as all the facts are yet to come out - it's too early. Sometimes it takes years, if not decades, for the truth to surface. I wouldn't put it past the USA, the UK has killed people abroad and we still have 70 years to wait until the David Kelly files are released - so I wouldn't put it past the UK either.
the David Kelly files... come off it...
can you give and example where either the UK or US has used nerve agent or a radioactive isotope to assassinate someone in a foreign country we're ostensibly supposed to be at peace with?
The UK has used chemical weapons in WW1 and WW2
we are a world leader in their manufacture
but you seem to think that the UK are holier than thou when I can assure you they are not.
Well it wasn't via poisoning but we did drone strike people in allied Pakistan without thier permission.
And killed a few civilians as collateral
That isn't done without their permission.
Speaking at the end of his visit, Emmerson said: "The position of the government of Pakistan is quite clear. It does not consent to the use of drones by the United States on its territory and it considers this to be a violation of Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
"As a matter of international law the US drone campaign in Pakistan is therefore being conducted without the consent of the elected representatives of the people, or the legitimate government of the state. It involves the use of force on the territory of another state without its consent and is therefore a violation of Pakistan's sovereignty.