Former Russian double agent seriously ill in Salisbury.

so thats a yes then, you get called out and you run for the hills

nope I'm happy to have a discussion about this but you're seemingly not willing to engage, if you actually want to engage in a civil conversation then just answer my previous questions so we can establish what exactly you're unsure of.
 
provide proof of the claims you made in post 1848 .lets start there

we dont need to have a conversation about anything else, im really not into that ASL stuff youre wanting to do
 
provide proof of the claims you made in post 1848 .lets start there

we dont need to have a conversation about anything else, im really not into that ASL stuff youre wanting to do

I think you're being intellectually dishonest here, I'm not sure what "ASL stuff" is but you're not even prepared to engage in discussion. I'm more than happy to have a discussion if you're willing but I'd like to know what specifically you're unaware of - I mentioned multiple incidents involving Russia. I find it hard to believe that you're unaware that say Russia invaded Crimea? Is that the case? If it is please say so and I'll find you some news reporting covering that, if not then you could perhaps save me some time and specify what exactly you need clarification from in my post.

I'd again refer you to the article about sea lioning as that is what you're attempting to do by just blindly demanding "proof" of multiple different events plenty of which are common knowledge and not in dispute. So if you're actually genuine in your questioning you ought to provide some clarification.
 
In fact, I'll play along @Amnesia I'll assume you have no knowledge of anything I've posted about - though so as not to get things too muddled I'll go through in order - lets take a look at my first claim:

"invading neighbouring states"

here is a recent example, Russia invading Georgia:

here is a BBC article from the time:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7550354.stm

here is an RT article 5 years after:

https://www.rt.com/politics/ossetia-georgia-russia-media-166/

So - were you completely unaware of that happening?
 
you made some claims and i called you out on them and now you're wanting to talk about anything but wont go anywhere near providing proof to back up your claims,
4 times i asked you to provide proof.
 
Nope I'm still here, I haven't run away and I'm perfectly willing to discuss, I don't really want to derail the thread and frankly some of the posts are already doing that though so could you please engage in some discussion instead of just trolling. I've posted some links for you in the previous post, lets start there...
 
and the rest or have you suddenly forgot about them?

dont cry about derailing the thread when you are the one who made the claims and all i've done is asked you to provide proof on what you posted
 
and the rest or have you suddenly forgot about them?

I'm perfectly happy to do that too in due course, but I've not had any response from you to the first one. Stop trolling please, I've posted the link and am willing to enter a discussion - can you please respond?
 
haha so you said it would be a waste of time yet have responded another 5 times on the same topic and failed to provide proof to back up your claims.
now you want to talk about the weather ? computer builds ? lego ? being a squirmy little worm ?
 
But if you were to say include, invading neighbouring states

Like Cuba? Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Libya? Just because they aren't neighboring countries I.e. The US only shares a border with 2 nations. Russia shares it with 14-16 (depending on your sources)

annexing territory of neighbouring states
remove neighboring and see if military bases and exclusive zones is not the same thing. Equally I could say to you that with Crimea, people have a right to self determination. I value tha. Some people don't because they get told no.

abducting border guards from neighbouring states

I'm noticing your caveat here: neighboring. So because of earlier statement we need to expand this a little further. Abducting border guards... The US special rendition (supported by the UK I might add)... Is that not abduction?

using a radioactive weapon

Yes, like depleted uranium rounds, thousands of which cause birth defects to this day or did you mean Agent Orange?

in the middle of a major capital city in an assassination

The US and UK have the most comprehensive assassination like (JPEL) with often thousands of individuals on it.

using nerve agent as a weapon in an assassination attempt

Yeah but your proof wouldn't stand up in trial. In fact after your opening statement, a Judge would be compelled to dismiss - with prejudice.

killing journalists who write critical articles about the state

Same old... Same old.

shooting down a civilian airliner then actively trying to cover it up/deny it ever happened....

Careful what you say, you are now saying the Russian STATE did this. The reality is it was Russian made weapons that we can be about 99% sure shot it down. In the 80's it was US stinger missiles that shot down civilian aircraft. Not the state but US made.

Well you can't really say the same about the UK, US, France etc...

This is the brick wall moment. I am fine saying Russia do bad things. All the things I say here. But I can be open enough to admit the same from the UK.

Do we not do:
Dodgy arms deals
Support dictators
Conduct CE
Finance dodgy groups (eg ISIS/Al N)
Corrupt nations
Use our power to pressure smaller states

You think not, despite everything with irrefutable evidence to the contrary.
 
This is the brick wall moment. I am fine saying Russia do bad things. All the things I say here. But I can be open enough to admit the same from the UK.

not quite, you're seemingly fine with detaching yourself from reality and trying to paint them as "just as bad" as the UK, US etc.. or portray them as just doing the same sorts of things as other countries...

Yet your response to journalists getting murdered is "same old same old"

and your response to the shooting of a civilian airliner is to pretend the posts where the inquiry has traced the source of the missile to a specific Russian military unit don't exist... you're just actively denying reality

trying to respond with "but Iraq, but arms deals" is just a weak attempt to draw a false equivalence - journalists in the UK don't need to worry about the state murdering them, the UK's neighbours don't need to worry about territory being annexed or border guards being abducted - we're not about to carve out an extra bit of the Republic of Ireland and add it to Northern Ireland, the US isn't about to annex a chunk of Mexico.

You have no equivalent of either the UK or US using a radioactive isotope as a weapon or a nerve agent, in the middle of a city, for a targeted assassination/to send a message.
 
You have no equivalent of either the UK or US using a radioactive isotope as a weapon or a nerve agent, in the middle of a city, for a targeted assassination/to send a message.

You can't say that yet as all the facts are yet to come out - it's too early. Sometimes it takes years, if not decades, for the truth to surface. I wouldn't put it past the USA, the UK has killed people abroad and we still have 70 years to wait until the David Kelly files are released - so I wouldn't put it past the UK either.
 
You can't say that yet as all the facts are yet to come out - it's too early. Sometimes it takes years, if not decades, for the truth to surface. I wouldn't put it past the USA, the UK has killed people abroad and we still have 70 years to wait until the David Kelly files are released - so I wouldn't put it past the UK either.

the David Kelly files... come off it...

can you give and example where either the UK or US has used nerve agent or a radioactive isotope to assassinate someone in a foreign country we're ostensibly supposed to be at peace with?
 
That's all too specific really.. The UK has used chemical weapons in WW1 and WW2, we are a world leader in their manufacture and have tested them, in secret, on our own servicemen - only telling the truth when people died, and that took years to come out also.

I do think that Russia poisoned Litvinenko, so I'm not saying that Russia are saints, but you seem to think that the UK are holier than thou when I can assure you they are not.

We have stocks of Novichok, Borris told us that a day or to after the 'attack'. You can bet that if there are any theoretical nerve agents, like Novichok was, US/UK/France/Iran/Israel/etc are going to try and make it. Russia, as far as I know, have shut down their nerve agent programs that was overseen by the OPCW something like 20 years ago yet the UK still have theirs going at Porton Down which is less than 6 miles from Salisbury.

Also, the UK put a gagging order(DMSA notice) on the press reporting Pablo Miller(who also lives near Salisbury) into the frame, he was Skripals handler when he was a agent of MI5/6 - all of which ties Skripal to the Trump dodgy Dossier via Mr Christopher Steel and his company Orbis(Pablo Miller worked for orbis). It's a very tangled web for sure.
 
the David Kelly files... come off it...

can you give and example where either the UK or US has used nerve agent or a radioactive isotope to assassinate someone in a foreign country we're ostensibly supposed to be at peace with?


Well it wasn't via poisoning but we did drone strike people in allied Pakistan without thier permission.

And killed a few civilians as collateral
 
The UK has used chemical weapons in WW1 and WW2

Actually, you'll find no-one used chemical weapons in the European battlefield during WW2 (apart from Nazi gas chambers)

we are a world leader in their manufacture

We'll need some citation on that one, I think you have conflated that we are a major arms manufacturer, not chemical weapons manufacturer

but you seem to think that the UK are holier than thou when I can assure you they are not.

I shouldn't think anyone thinks that
 
That isn't done without their permission.

Yes it was, the Pakistani government were very outspoken against it.

The UN investigators comments on the issue

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/15/us-drone-strikes-pakistan

Speaking at the end of his visit, Emmerson said: "The position of the government of Pakistan is quite clear. It does not consent to the use of drones by the United States on its territory and it considers this to be a violation of Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity.

"As a matter of international law the US drone campaign in Pakistan is therefore being conducted without the consent of the elected representatives of the people, or the legitimate government of the state. It involves the use of force on the territory of another state without its consent and is therefore a violation of Pakistan's sovereignty.

Don't think we got permission for the Osama bin Laden raid either..
 
Back
Top Bottom