Forza 2: No AA in final version

Mr Latte said:
Maybe if you actually owned a 360 and played some of the games youd get a better first hand judgement. Oh but then you already are an expert on the topic.

You would just dismiss any negatives anyway even if he did :rolleyes:
 
I'm just watching a replay of me in the M3,drifting round the final bend and i have to say its the best graphics i've ever seen in a racing game to date.The track detail is amazing.

Where the hell is my wheel :mad:
 
i-bert said:
I'm just watching a replay of me in the M3,drifting round the final bend and i have to say its the best graphics i've ever seen in a racing game to date.The track detail is amazing.

Where the hell is my wheel :mad:
Replays are more detailed...
 
dirtydog said:
Exactly. Yet sadly all too many people are ready to jump on anyone who points out these things and call us 'unrealistic' for not being satsfied with it.
The console might be more powerful, but the demands are incredible from what it's trying to achieve.

Running so much more at once does have an adverse effect, it would irregardless of power. It goes to reason that the harder you push an object, the greater the reaction. On the newer consoles there are more objects being pushed harder than ever before. It might be more powerful yes, but it's not doing the same things as the last generation either.

God of War 2 can do a lot because they know the limitations of the PS2, a console which, in comparison to the Playstation 3 or Xbox360 doesn't have anywhere near the level of output to give. The playstation 2 has a single texture output, basic physics, lower quality audio, vastly lower polygon counts...

The new things that are happening right now in terms of tecnological advancements are at the very beginning of their life-cycle, despite the console being 'next-gen' the techniques to achieve these new effects are very far from the tag the console has been given, these are very much in their infancy.

The simple fact is, to complete all these new effects is incredibly taxing on the system, that is why on the PC you have newer and newer GPU's worth almost quadruple the cost of an Xbox360, seperate physics cards, more and more memory being required, and faster processors. Despite the cost of all those seperate, powerful parts the Xbox360 is currently matching it punch for punch with what is clearly an inferior specification and if PC games are struggling for frame-rate (which they really are) then what do you expect from the Xbox360.

Too many people bandie around their opinions (which is justified - after all it's a public forum), but it's when they start talking about something that they aren't educated in, where as a couple of people here are (Nintenjo, alpha(?), Myself and I think a couple of others).

The leap between series 6 and series 7 of consoles is the most advanced leap that there has ever been and to have accomplished what they have so quickly should be hailed and not shot-down. The real leap will be coming in the next-generation where the current techniques really come into play. It's always harder to build hardware predicting what is necessary than building hardware knowing what is necessary and for that reason I expect a massive change in the 8th generation of consoles, but for now, the PS3 and Xbox360 are consistently improving and is all too often overlooked.
 
Mr Latte said:
Because Mr Latte only copied the press blurb what the title was advertised as having. It was always promoted as 720p 4xAA and can i add at no time was it mentioned the full game wouldnt still offer this.


Exactly you should be outraged!! You should be on your moral high horse!! look at the abuse Sony took for lying to you and you didnt even care about the PS3, This is your most anticipated title of like forever, you should be going postal right now!! Oh but it's ok they only had 2 years to develop it!

Personally i think the graphics are very sub par, as for the game, i will wait till i play it, but i dont think i will play it for long, as i will probably banish to to a corner when MS try to rape me for DLC

And to be fair, if this is what GT5 has as its competition, then i dont think Yamauchi San has much to worry about.
 
Dirtydog

You probably know that your negativity and moaning wind me up,but i know you're not stupid and like your car games.I really wish you could see this running on a 92" screen because i think you would be impressed.

I was worried by some of the screenies and vids that came out.I'd be lieing if i said otherwise.But this is a great looking game,not just in the replays.
 
dirtydog said:
I think it does. There are plenty of games on previous platforms which I've been fully satisfied with (and I am demanding) in all departments. Games with lots of content. Games with great graphics which fully utilise the hardware they are on. Games with a professional sheen and polish.
the perfect game is the equivalent of the Holy Grail, it may or may not exist ever, and no-one may ever find it. It's the challenge game developers take on, striving for perfection.
 
NokkonWud said:
The simple fact is, to complete all these new effects is incredibly taxing on the system, that is why on the PC you have newer and newer GPU's worth almost quadruple the cost of an Xbox360, seperate physics cards, more and more memory being required, and faster processors. Despite the cost of all those seperate, powerful parts the Xbox360 is currently matching it punch for punch with what is clearly an inferior specification and if PC games are struggling for frame-rate (which they really are) then what do you expect from the Xbox360.
Hang on, that is not a fair defence of the 360. Why? Because it has been ever thus. The PS2 and Xbox were on paper very weak compared to PCs of the time, yet even now there are games on both of those platforms which perform as well as PC games do today. Look at something like Burnout Revenge. Can you imagine a PC with a Celeron 733, 64MB and a Geforce3 running that at 60fps? Even the PS2 can do it. A fixed hardware platform has always been able to dramatically outperform what a PC can do, when the raw hardware specs are compared. I am not comparing the 360 to a PC. I am comparing it to the last-gen consoles and simply expecting a good improvement compared to them. Anything less is not acceptable.
 
JUMPURS said:
And to be fair, if this is what GT5 has as its competition, then i dont think Yamauchi San has much to worry about.
Where as I disagree. If GT:HD is a sign of things to come then Forza has no competition.

Whilst I am really looking forward to GT5 it had better be a start improvement on GT:HD, a game, which for me is up there with the biggest disappointments of all time.
 
JUMPURS said:
And to be fair, if this is what GT5 has as its competition, then i dont think Yamauchi San has much to worry about.

Is there gonna be AI in GT5 or is it gonna be you against the good looking scalectrix cars like in the previous version? ;)
 
NokkonWud said:
Where as I disagree. If GT:HD is a sign of things to come then Forza has no competition.

Whilst I am really looking forward to GT5 it had better be a start improvement on GT:HD, a game, which for me is up there with the biggest disappointments of all time.
You accept that GT:HD is better graphically than Forza 2 though?
 
dirtydog said:
Hang on, that is not a fair defence of the 360. Why? Because it has been ever thus. The PS2 and Xbox were on paper very weak compared to PCs of the time, yet even now there are games on both of those platforms which perform as well as PC games do today. Look at something like Burnout Revenge.
Such as?
dirtydog said:
Can you imagine a PC with a Celeron 733, 64MB and a Geforce3 running that at 60fps? Even the PS2 can do it.
So why did (for example) Max Payne on my Athlno 600mhz, 128mb RAM and GeForce 2 absolutely blow away the Playstation2 and Xbox versions graphically?
dirtydog said:
A fixed hardware platform has always been able to dramatically outperform what a PC can do, when the raw hardware specs are compared. I am not comparing the 360 to a PC. I am comparing it to the last-gen consoles and simply expecting a good improvement compared to them. Anything less is not acceptable.
As I mentioned, the new graphical techniques being utilised now are the first time they have done so in consoles. Hardware was decided prior to new techniques being made a standard, running in higher resolution with bells and whistles.

Because this is the first generation of which consoles ARE direct competition to PC's.

To say games AREN'T an improvement is ridiculous...

Better Graphics
Better Audio
Better Music
Better Physics
Better Online Play
Better Models

You can't have your cake and eat it, you say games should be running at 60fps and when they don't complain. When a game finally does run at 60fps you complain because graphically, it's not as good as the other games.
 
JUMPURS said:
Like the AI in this forza Demo?? :p

I just played with the AI, slowing down in front of them and they reacted fine, they either slowed behind me or dived across the track and passed me, must be something wrong with your game.
 
Back
Top Bottom