• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Geforce GTX1180/2080 Speculation thread

It's good to see the 2080Ti handily beats the £2800 Titan V at all resolutions and in all games.

Got some reviews comparing the two there?

Would be very interesting to see. Also a shame NV never added one of these nice new reference coolers to the V, and stuck with their old blower
 

Interesting stuff
Not enough to make me consider one just for gaming yet. Odd how Turing is losing in Vulkan considering they spoke more about it’s a-sync capabilities.

Loses in most of the games I play, looking at mins.
Plus my V runs rather well above it’s rated boost, which helps.

The 7nm RTX card’s will be the real go tos it seems. Wonder if they’ll keep the current pricing for those or move up a smidge again.
 
Interesting stuff
Not enough to make me consider one just for gaming yet. Odd how Turing is losing in Vulkan considering they spoke more about it’s a-sync capabilities.

Loses in most of the games I play, looking at mins.
Plus my V runs rather well above it’s rated boost, which helps.

The 7nm RTX card’s will be the real go tos it seems. Wonder if they’ll keep the current pricing for those or move up a smidge again.

I would expect the BOM for 7nm cards would be lower, smaller chips, less power delivery, less cooling requirements so they might be slightly cheaper, but if Trump's trade war continues/escalates they may go up 50%.
 
Looking to the future, Microsoft will lay a foundation for real-time ray tracing and AI with its Windows 10 October Update, scheduled to include DirectX Raytracing and Windows ML. A month later, Battlefield V is expected to launch with hybrid rendering support. A post-launch patch will add ray tracing to Shadow of the Tomb Raider, though there’s no way to know exactly when that will happen. Through the end of 2018 and 2019, Nvidia says nine other games will make its vision a reality, “with more to come.” Slowly, the pieces are falling into place. We see the end-game and we’re excited about what ray tracing means to realism and immersive gaming experiences.

Do you need evidence before you put faith in this cause? Check out the Star Wars Reflections demo that we recorded at 2560x1440 and 3840x2160. With DLSS enabled, we saw ~50 FPS at QHD and ~30 FPS at 4K. Frame rates were predominantly in the 20s at 2560x1440 without DLSS. We also made a video running on GeForce GTX 1080 at QHD, but it only ran between 6 and 8 FPS. So, you can see how these technologies fit together, creating a truly cinematic scene rendered in real-time on Turing-based GPUs.

Gaming at around 30fps in 4k, or around 50fps at 1440p, nope, ive got no faith in that at all, sorry.
 
Last edited:
Gaming at around 30fps in 4k, or around 50fps at 1440p, nope, ive got no faith in that at all, sorry.

Its not a game. It was a techdemo to showcase near movie quality in realtime rendering for quadro cards.

They added DLSS to show what DLSS can do for framerates, not to try to suggest that techdemo could become a game.
 
Anyone else getting a 2080 ti just for 1440p like me? :) If I have spare power over 144hz i'll just shove it into supersampling / raytracing
 
Tbh I've got a 2080 coming tomorrow and will see how it copes paired with my chip , I'm excited as it's a new new ...but first time I've had a hint of buyers remource on a hardware purchase since piledriver. But this time its a lot more money to be sore about . even worse is I am at 1080p(uw) effectively so I'm sure I'll be bottlenecking , but hopefully I'll hit the 166hz mark more often then my 1070 did .
 
Tbh I've got a 2080 coming tomorrow and will see how it copes paired with my chip , I'm excited as it's a new new ...but first time I've had a hint of buyers remource on a hardware purchase since piledriver. But this time its a lot more money to be sore about . even worse is I am at 1080p(uw) effectively so I'm sure I'll be bottlenecking , but hopefully I'll hit the 166hz mark more often then my 1070 did .

Still a decent step up from 1070. I'm also upgrading from the 1070, but to the rtx ti on 1440p UW.
 
true but lets be honest... everyone - even the people who bought the titan V at 3K must surely have known that chances are the next gen gpu was close, and that it was highly likely that the top 20xx card was going to beat it.

if they didnt know that then they have ignored history the last 3 generations.

The thing is the Titan V released when we were thinking Volta was the next gen, and the Titan's been the name for the ultimate Nvidia gaming card since day 1 when we got the Kepler Titan. I'd put money on Nvidia wanting to see how the gamer's took to the Titan V pricing and how it sold, Based on that they took it as an opportunity to push costs up across the board which is what we have here, I'd be very surprised if the Turing Titan isn't north of £1600.
 
Having looked at some more benchmarks, The titan V does beat the 2080Ti @ 4K in some benchmarks. The Division, Metro Redux and Doom for instance.

Strange Brigade is an interesting one.

The difference between Volta and Pascal is much bigger than Turing and Pascal.

Any comparisons between Volta and Turing need to take into account the overclocking headroom the former has as it is a professional card and clocked quite low for normal use whereas Turing is clocked near the maximum out of the box.
 
Any comparisons between Volta and Turing need to take into account the overclocking headroom the former has as it is a professional card and clocked quite low for normal use whereas Turing is clocked near the maximum out of the box.

I'd certainly be interested in benchmarks from both cards clocked, hopefully we'll get something soon :)

edit - I get 14807 gfx score in Timespy Kaap, your Titan V gets 14806!! Close then...
 
true but lets be honest... everyone - even the people who bought the titan V at 3K must surely have known that chances are the next gen gpu was close, and that it was highly likely that the top 20xx card was going to beat it.

if they didnt know that then they have ignored history the last 3 generations.

I was expecting Turing to beat Volta easy but this is not the case, it could be due to NVidia originally intending to produce it on 10nm instead of the 12nm it is now on.
 
I'd certainly be interested in benchmarks from both cards clocked, hopefully we'll get something soon :)

We have plenty of bench treads on OcUK and people who can compare.

One early observation I have seen from the reviews is Turing performs well below 2160p but Volta is at its best at 4k. This could be due to the different memory techs used.:)
 
Back
Top Bottom