Poll: General election voting intentions poll

Voting intentions in the General Election - only use the poll if you intend to vote

  • Alliance Party of Northern Ireland

    Votes: 2 0.3%
  • Conservative

    Votes: 287 42.0%
  • Democratic Unionist Party

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 67 9.8%
  • Labour

    Votes: 108 15.8%
  • Liberal Democrat

    Votes: 25 3.7%
  • Other party (not named)

    Votes: 15 2.2%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 2 0.3%
  • Respect Party

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Scottish National Party

    Votes: 36 5.3%
  • Social Democratic and Labour Party

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 4 0.6%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 137 20.0%

  • Total voters
    684
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Last edited:
Judging by the sub 100 IQ of BNP voters average I disagree.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608001049

Green - 108.3
Liberal Democrat - 108.2
Conservative - 103.7
Labour – 103
Plaid Cymru - 102.5
Scottish National - 102.2
UK Independence - 101.1
British National - 98.4
Did not vote/None of the above - 99.7

Well judging by that, no wonder I vote green :D Although that still seems a very low IQ, I suppose all the stupids that vote bring the average down.
 
I commend you on your exemplary critical analysis and sound logical reasoning.

When you state your case in such a convincing fashion how can I possibly argue against that?

You can't, especially when the bunch of people you want to vote for are unhinged nut jobs that can barely string two thoughts together. The study certainly doesn't ring true here

 
:D.

How many of you really think you could notice such a minute jump in IQ? It's like overclocking you wouldn't notice in everyday activities only when 'benchmarked'.
 
Well you know what i'm going to ask you now, i assume you have proof on stand by. And i presume you saw Judgeneo's post?

First of all, it's Nigel who should be proving his nutty conspiracy theories about EU buying British professors to go to schools and brainwash kids, not me disproving the contrary. The proof is that he has no proof. It's a soundbait, that how Nigel works - he'll repeat some made up stuff few times, rise your and your mates adrenaline, make sure most of you will remember it, few days later he will get pressed to the wall on some TV program and back away from it, but most people won't see it.

As for Judgeneo post, of course most studies about EU will be commissioned by EU. Who else would commission such studies? Nigel?

And as for Nigel's tax avoidance - that's a proven point. He does it and he supports tax avoidance.
 
First of all, it's Nigel who should be proving his nutty conspiracy theories about EU buying British professors to go to schools and brainwash kids, not me disproving the contrary. The proof is that he has no proof. It's a soundbait, that how Nigel works - he'll repeat some made up stuff few times, rise your and your mates adrenaline, make sure most of you will remember it, few days later he will get pressed to the wall on some TV program and back away from it, but most people won't see it.

As for Judgeneo post, of course most studies about EU will be commissioned by EU. Who else would commission such studies? Nigel?

And as for Nigel's tax avoidance - that's a proven point. He does it and he supports tax avoidance.

Unfortunately I'm at work so can't look at the videos posted but did he really say he'd never participated in tax avoidance when the evidence is clearly there for all to see? You couldn't make this stuff up.

I'd also like to see a link to the EU buying out professors to brainwash students if that's what he claims.

Stop proving i'm right damit! :D

It looks like you're proving him right I'm afraid :D
 
Unfortunately I'm at work so can't look at the videos posted but did he really say he'd never participated in tax avoidance when the evidence is clearly there for all to see? You couldn't make this stuff up.

You couldn't. He said "I have never avoided any tax myself… I have an accountant who does everything and particularly since I was elected to the European Parliament 16 years ago, it's an issue I have to be very careful about."

I hope it's not the same accountant who got him and his mates into EU expenses scandal. Some of his party members are still doing time over that.
 
Judging by the sub 100 IQ of BNP voters average I disagree, you have to be an idiot to vote for them.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608001049

Green - 108.3
Liberal Democrat - 108.2
Conservative - 103.7
Labour – 103
Plaid Cymru - 102.5
Scottish National - 102.2
UK Independence - 101.1
British National - 98.4
Did not vote/None of the above - 99.7

You're assuming intelligent = better though. Intelligence doesn't come into the matter of voting for what matters in someone's life and what benefits them most. If the so called stupid people believe that bnp suits their needs then so be it.
 
First of all, it's Nigel who should be proving his nutty conspiracy theories about EU buying British professors to go to schools and brainwash kids, not me disproving the contrary. The proof is that he has no proof. It's a soundbait, that how Nigel works - he'll repeat some made up stuff few times, rise your and your mates adrenaline, make sure most of you will remember it, few days later he will get pressed to the wall on some TV program and back away from it, but most people won't see it.

As for Judgeneo post, of course most studies about EU will be commissioned by EU. Who else would commission such studies? Nigel?

And as for Nigel's tax avoidance - that's a proven point. He does it and he supports tax avoidance.

So if you had the chance to avoid tax legally you'd still pay it.
 
You're assuming intelligent = better though. Intelligence doesn't come into the matter of voting for what matters in someone's life and what benefits them most. If the so called stupid people believe that bnp suits their needs then so be it.
You are forgetting the tendency for people to vote against their own interests out of ignorance. I recall seeing a study which also showed that the more ignorant a person is regarding politics (no research) the more likely they are to vote for the extreme parties.

Hell even most 'informed voters' can't describe their chosen parties stance on most of the key areas (crime & punishment, the environment, the economy, welfare, defence).

This isn't a less intelligent person making an effort & selecting a good party which represents them, it's idiocy leading stupidity into the voting booth.

The turkeys voting for Christmas comes to mind.
 
Last edited:
So if you had the chance to avoid tax legally you'd still pay it.

That's neither here nor there now is it, I'm sure a lot of people would love to shave some money off their tax to free up some extra cash.
The fact was he stated he hadn't participated in any tax avoidance when it's quite obvious he has, so just another bare-faced lie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom