Poll: General election voting round 5 (final one)

Voting intentions in the General Election?

  • Alliance Party of Northern Ireland

    Votes: 3 0.3%

  • Conservative

    Votes: 403 42.2%

  • Democratic Unionist Party

    Votes: 2 0.2%

  • Green Party

    Votes: 59 6.2%

  • Labour

    Votes: 176 18.4%

  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 67 7.0%

  • Not voting/will spoil ballot

    Votes: 42 4.4%

  • Other party (not named)

    Votes: 8 0.8%

  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 1 0.1%

  • Respect Party

    Votes: 1 0.1%

  • Scottish National Party

    Votes: 37 3.9%

  • Social Democratic and Labour Party

    Votes: 1 0.1%

  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 2 0.2%

  • UKIP

    Votes: 154 16.1%
  • Total voters
    956
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
bowey said:
the sad thing is regardless who comes into power, nothing will change.
Click to expand...

This is probably true. There will be a tinkering around the edges and a massive amount of spin but no massive change.

It struck me as I went to the gym that there are no 'vote for XXX' posters up anywhere. Elections past almost every lamppost had a poster. Then there was the major billboards. Just covered 14 miles and not a single poster.
 
TwsT said:
And we would also like to know how you intend on replacing the the 22 billion in NET taxes the immigrants bring in to the country once you ban them all, Without raising taxes on hard working English folk.
Click to expand...

No one has suggested that 'immigrants would all be banned', this idea can only have come from you're imagination.

Yes immigrants do bring a lot of benefit to any nation, but this has to be tempered with the pressure it puts on social infrastructure.

So we as a nation need to measure the positives of immigration vs infrastructural capacity.

e.g if there are jobs on reed looking for warehouse staff, and it has hundreds of applications, then we should say hm we need to reduce numbers of un-skilled/low skilled immigrants.

and if we e.g have a big shortage of gp's in Wales we should be able to say ok, people who are qualified to carry out this role from anywhere in the world need to be given priority so as to fill our skill shortages.
 
do_ron_ron said:
Not followed your thread but taking the Fail as a source of information. These adult comics should not be used any more than the Beano.
Click to expand...

Just so you're safe, here are other sources for that news item

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/05/...our-canvassers-outing-me-to-religious-voters/

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/poli...re-telling-orthodox-jews-im-gay-10228322.html

http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/1...jews-i’m-gay-claims-tory-candidate-mike-freer

http://www.times-series.co.uk/news/...outing____Tory_candidate_to_religious_voters/

Pick whichever one makes you feel most comfortable, go on....i'll wait...
 
OMG, all of a sudden it's all becoming so clear, Farage's real motivation, he has concocted the most elaborate scheme in history to try and get rid of his wife! :D
 
I just remembered last year's BNP song.


I reckon that's something we can all agree was jolly funny :D

Anyway, I'm pretty much bored of this thread. Hope all your election dreams come true :)
 
robgmun said:
I will post it as many times as is needed

291 indiscretions from the Lib/Lab/Con since Jan 1st 2015

http://nopenothope.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/291-liblabconsnp-councillors-their.html

And since that articule

28 more members of our Lib/Lab/Con hall of shame since 22 April

http://nopenothope.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/28-more-members-of-our-liblabcon-hall.html

Total: 319 in 5 months, faster rate you say DP?:D
Click to expand...

That list is not just Lib/Lab/Con. There are Sinn Fein and SDLP people there too. The second list even contains people who appear to have no political affiliation at all other than being a bit nasty to UKIP. Also, some of "hall of shame" members have not been active members of their party in the last 5 months. For example, the first guy in the first link was about historical offences committed by a guy who once ran for SDLP councillor in 1983 which is before UKIP even existed.

Even if we ignore this, Lib/Lab/Con have a total of over 17,000 councilors compared to 370 for UKIP and 614 MPs compared to 2 for UKIP. Are we supposed to be shocked that your list has a higher number than the list of incidents surrounding UKIP?
 
Moses said:
Why have you started talking about Cameron illegally squatting in Downing Street? It's ridiculous. Fuelled by your tears, given a Cameron led minority government is looking like a real possibility now, after your fairly dismissive comments about its probability being greater than zero?
Click to expand...

What are you on about? You really need to keep taking your meds!!


I under mentioned the possibility of Cameron illegally squating, others said he would. I have simply pointed out it would be illegal if he fails at the Queens speech.

Why would I care if the conservative get in power,I really don't care if it is labour or the Tories. They are inseparable in my mind and as bad as each other, i have no opinion either way. Their odds are still extremely remote going by expert analysis
 
robgmun said:
Just so you're safe, here are other sources for that news item

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/05/...our-canvassers-outing-me-to-religious-voters/

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/poli...re-telling-orthodox-jews-im-gay-10228322.html

http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/1...jews-i’m-gay-claims-tory-candidate-mike-freer

http://www.times-series.co.uk/news/...outing____Tory_candidate_to_religious_voters/

Pick whichever one makes you feel most comfortable, go on....i'll wait...
Click to expand...



*puts on asbestos suit*



*douses self in anti fire foam*



*get's in shower*



If some voters choose not to vote for homosexual candidates due to their religion, what's wrong with them being told who the homosexual ones are?

I'm not saying it's right, but it's their choice and right or wrong they shouldn't be impeded from making their choice.
 
escape sanity said:
That list is not just Lib/Lab/Con. There are Sinn Fein and SDLP people there too. The second list even contains people who appear to have no political affiliation at all other than being a bit nasty to UKIP. Also, some of "hall of shame" members have not been active members of their party in the last 5 months. For example, the first guy in the first link was about historical offences committed by a guy who once ran for SDLP councillor in 1983 which is before UKIP even existed.

Even if we ignore this, Lib/Lab/Con have a total of over 17,000 councilors compared to 370 for UKIP and 614 MPs compared to 2 for UKIP. Are we supposed to be shocked that your list has a higher number than the list of incidents surrounding UKIP?
Click to expand...


Exactly, robgum has just proved my point that UKIP candidates commit offenses at a higher rate than the other parties when taking into account number of candidates. Moreover he has proved that the media are into biased against UKIP.
 
jimjamuk said:
Ignoring the Queens speech?

If no one (or group) can pass the confidence test at that point he's he incumbent Prime minister with no one to replace him. That point we re run the whole thing again but in the meantime he stays Prime Minister - you don't actually believe that if nobody wins there is no government or PM for weeks /months whilst they fight it out.

I know you don't like the bloke but at least accept that's whats going to happen in this scenario
Click to expand...

And if if Labour goes forwards, passes the vote of confidence but Cameron refuses to let Millband become PM due to not having the most seats then Cameron would be breaking the law.
 
robgmun said:
Wait, some people here still think UKIP want to ban immigration? Surely no one here is that stupid right??
Click to expand...

Well it is on their manifesto for starters, albeit for 5 years. But what would be the guarantee after 5 years it is no longer banned?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom