Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Mar 2013
- Posts
- 3,321
- Location
- Caistor
Not sure how effective that would be. 3 out of the 4 members of staff I spoke to said that this was a good IPS panel with no more than perfectly normal glow or blb:
https://goo.gl/photos/6Y9uwNZCJA4m4FWy6
https://goo.gl/photos/HtYdVZt3v2yFHvfM6
Given the faff it must be for them to have to arrange RMA and send it back to Acer, I'm not convinced a panel quality check by the reseller would be worth any money.
What I mean is that they have to release a standard protocol for all the panel control, e.g. Compare each panel's LED glow in a pitch black room against a monitor that only has the standard IPS glow or compare the photographic shots of the panels in a control manner (e.g. 1/2s, f/2, 24mm?). They can release the standard to the forum members and we can choose whether their standard is acceptable. It's a bit like 8-pack binned CPU chips, you pay a premium for them to pre-bin the monitor.
Sure sometimes we can still argue, then all we need would be to produce the photographic shot and OcUK will have to take back the panel no question asked. This way it's a lot more transparent to both parties and I think it'll make everyone happy, except the manufacturers, but if they don't wanna keep the QC up to par then I think OcUK would have all the reason not to stock them and give other monitor manufacturers a shot.
I think what OcUK would have to do is also produce a standard protocol of the baseline for IPS glow. The easiest way would be to release a photograph of the standard glow on a IPS curved monitor to all the RMA staff so they will know what is IPS glow and what is BLB, instead of just learning the fact that light in the edge of a IPS curve = IPS glow. But on the other hand, when filing an RMA I think it's also reasonable to request a shot of the monitor showing a all black image in a pitch black/near dark room, too much ambient light would also confuse an untrained eyes of the slight reflection on the surface of the panel.
Last edited: