Not sure Asus are much better, I've had 3 panels and all had pretty back backlight bleed. Bottom-right corner seems to be the biggest issue on the MG279Q for some reason.
Got some in the top and bottom right of my XF270HU but if you want this kind of panel you have to put up with some shortcomings, it isn't enough to annoy me. If you are the kind that doesn't like any backlight glow/bleed then you should just get a TN with worse colours but better blacks and some shifting. I'd never spend over £400 on a monitor like these because you know you'll have to put up with some of these characteristics which I fail to accept over this price point.
Deary me
Maybe OCUK should just stop stockin' 'em until Acer sort out their QC. High RMA rates can't be good for anyone...
Don't think it is entirely Acer/Asus' fault but more along the lines of AUO thinking it's okay to send poor panels out, if Acer/Asus sent them back and told them it isn't good enough maybe they'd stop sending dodgy units out.
I've got three Dell UltraSharp monitors and they are all perfect. I'll never buy another brand of monitor in the future because the UltraSharps are so good. I don't need any of those fluff features like G-sync or 144Hz I just want a really high quality professional monitor.
You are the kind of person that the UltraSharps are aimed at, brilliant monitors but G-Sync/Freesync and 144hz is a must for many of us.