Look how long it took them to give our goal, which was clearly not a handball. Either scrap VAR or use it and give correct decisions, there's no in between.If it takes this long using lines, it's got to stand surely. Daft.
Because they are calibrated.I don't understand the use of the lines myself because you're talking such fine margin of error. To judge at that level you have to be 100% confident in the technology. For example, how are they sure the picture angle isn't making things look on/offside due to perspective?
The camera isn't shooting at a high enough frame rate to guarantee they're getting the exact moment of pass either. They're making totally marginal decisions on like 5mm of body being offside with a best guess screenshot of when the pass occurred.I don't understand the use of the lines myself because you're talking such fine margin of error. To judge at that level you have to be 100% confident in the technology. For example, how are they sure the picture angle isn't making things look on/offside due to perspective?
Offside is the one thing it gets right and you want to get rid of it? A little offside is offside, it's black and white. why people want a gray "he was only a little offside lets allow it" i dont know.Wolves seem to get shafted by VAR (I guess it’s the rules rather than var) every time I watch them.
Ditch it for offsides until the rules have been changed.
I don't understand the use of the lines myself because you're talking such fine margin of error. To judge at that level you have to be 100% confident in the technology. For example, how are they sure the picture angle isn't making things look on/offside due to perspective?
I don't understand the use of the lines myself because you're talking such fine margin of error. To judge at that level you have to be 100% confident in the technology. For example, how are they sure the picture angle isn't making things look on/offside due to perspective?