Which will still be 100x more accurate than a linesmans eyesight.They're making totally marginal decisions on like 5mm of body being offside with a best guess screenshot of when the pass occurred.
Which will still be 100x more accurate than a linesmans eyesight.They're making totally marginal decisions on like 5mm of body being offside with a best guess screenshot of when the pass occurred.
His foot was offside.Should be done by your feet imo.
Then it’s a fair decision. I don’t like all the hands and arms being offside crap.His foot was offside.
What will that achieve? Still be down to mm and linesShould be done by your feet imo.
Then it’s a fair decision. I don’t like all the hands and arms being offside crap.
interesting idea. A little buzzer should go off when it's pulled and tugged as well. hands off defenders!Should just make all the players wear motion capture suits and be done with it.
Sky will love that 'VAR DRAMA', the absolute freaks.
Wolves crying there was a handball in the build up to the Liverpool goal lol
Rugby?The problem with VAR in football is there are too many variables and rules for it to work with any simplicity.
In tennis the ball's either in or out. That's it.
In cricket it's a little slower but there are 3 phases to check for. Still pretty easy.
Offside is the one thing it gets right and you want to get rid of it? A little offside is offside, it's black and white. why people want a gray "he was only a little offside lets allow it" i dont know.
Rugby?
OMG. Arsenal Fan TV is going to be immense tonight!
Whatever happened to the VAR promise of "minimum interference - maximum benefit"? Instead, it's "maximum interference - minimum benefit" with PGMOL's petty, robotic, soulless, damaging application of technology. Rethink required. #LIVWOL