Why doesn't he play podolski and giroud up front?
Because Walcott is scoring
Why doesn't he play podolski and giroud up front?
Why doesn't he play podolski and giroud up front? That to me is the logical front 2.
Our entire team was woeful, you can't just blame Walcott. He had 1 ball through to him all game which he was marginally offside for. Our midfield has been massively dissapointing since the first few games. I don't understand our team at all, 95% of the play goes down the right hand side which results in pointless crosses all game when we have a midget up front. Even with Giroud up front a cross never gets near him. Our best crosser of the ball and best finisher gets isolated on the left, hardly ever passed to and subbed off every game. Sagna was truely awful, Jenkinson was awesome and one of our best players while he was injured yet doesn't even get a chance to come on as a sub when Sagna can't do anything right.
Then come Wengers default substitutions, Ramsey and Gervinho. They won't change a game, they never do but on top of that our formation and play style stays the same just with worse players.
Our entire team was woeful, you can't just blame Walcott. He had 1 ball through to him all game which he was marginally offside for. Our midfield has been massively dissapointing since the first few games. I don't understand our team at all, 95% of the play goes down the right hand side which results in pointless crosses all game when we have a midget up front. Even with Giroud up front a cross never gets near him. Our best crosser of the ball and best finisher gets isolated on the left, hardly ever passed to and subbed off every game. Sagna was truely awful, Jenkinson was awesome and one of our best players while he was injured yet doesn't even get a chance to come on as a sub when Sagna can't do anything right.
Then come Wengers default substitutions, Ramsey and Gervinho. They won't change a game, they never do but on top of that our formation and play style stays the same just with worse players.
Why doesn't he play podolski and giroud up front? That to me is the logical front 2.
Pretty much what i thought as well. The fact that we drew with Southampton was beyond hilarious. Its inexcusable that we dropped 2 pts to a team that earlier on we battered to high heaven. I mean geez we didnt score a goal but rather relied on an own goal.
I can blame Walcott, while he played upfront AND when he switched to the right he doesn't show for the ball, he was only ever looking to get behind.
Henry, Reyes, Wiltord, Giroud, RVP, Bendtner, Bergkamp, Rooney, Aguero, Villa, Torres, Drogba, they are all "available" for the ball all game. They don't ONLY look to run in behind, if the game isn't going well they'll happily come deeper, get on the ball and give other guys a chance to get forward.
Walcott doesn't want to fight, doesn't want to play as a forward, he wants to do one tiny small part of his job and nothing else at all.
Even in the 7-3 Newcastle game Giroud looked more available, more dynamic, more flexible and got involved more than Walcott did, Walcott got 3 goals, yet was barely involved in the game(though more than usual) against Southampton no one would have missed him at all, we could have played 10 men and been identical.
He doesn't work defenders, he doesn't change his runs, he doesn't drop deep to pull defenders out and make gaps for others to run into. He's so utterly limited and he makes a woeful woeful lone striker and a pretty woeful winger.
He's lazy and rubbish, Drogba can easily run onto a throughball if the chance comes up and would also finish more often than Walcott does, Drogba also does 100 other things when playing upfront, from defending to scoring any type of goal, or setting up others for any type of goal, great throughball, chip, hold up turn and run at goal, hold up turn and pass someone in. Walcott does none of that, which both makes him painfully predictable to defend against, but also makes Arsenal painfully predictable to defend against.
RVP spent half the year dropping deep to pick up the ball and vary the way we played last year. By dropping deep getting on the ball and setting others up, you make yourself and your team less predictable making the times you do run in behind less predictable... and so you can do that more often.
Walcott is rubbish and I can blame mostly him, him or the idiot who plays him.
If I were a neutral I'd watch Chelsea slaughter QPR.
Na , far more fun watching Liverpool lose again.
yeah but Newcastle v Everton could also be a good battle
MW