Greenlizard0 Weekend Football Thread ** spoilers ** [4th - 8th March 2016]

If a player out and out dives or worse, does what Vardy done the other week and actually makes the contact then nail them. If a player makes the most of a foul then blame the officials for encouraging it.

It would be wonderful if refs started giving fouls when players stayed up and then maybe we'd see more players do it. You won't see me criticise any player, even Utd players, for going to ground when they've been fouled whether they could stay on their feet or not though.

And that, right there, sums up everything that is wrong with football nowadays. It's become a sport of Tom Daleys.
 
Who gets the plonker of the weekend award, Mata or Coquelin?

Due to a bunch of teams having the wrong manager, wrong players, bad buys, bad sales or bad injuries this is a once in a decade type situation where Arsenal's top four rivals all suck. This is as such our best chance of winning the league in over a decade and maybe for a long time after with new managers at almost all the major rivals....... Coquelin by far was the biggest idiot. There isn't even a competition.

Utd win this or lose it.. honestly who cares, they are just waiting for next season some more buys, some injuries to be done and dusted with and a new manager. CL or no CL, they won't win it next year and the money while nice isn't make or break for them in the slightest.
 
Utd win this or lose it.. honestly who cares,.

could make a huge difference to top four bid to start with

for his "seniority" within the squad, experience etc etc and the time it happened in the match (and the time between the two yellows) Mata is by far more stupid than Coq
 
Last edited:
Not a fan of either club. No pen, the ball had gone and he used minor contact to fall over.

This argument does my head in. Does this mean you can punch a player if they don't have possession of the ball? And why do refs give fouls when a player is blocked off/pulled back off the ball?

What Benteke does after the challenge, whether he carries on his run, whether he does a triple summersault or drops down dead, and whether he's in possession of the ball or not makes no difference. The only decision the ref has to make is whether Delaney tripped him or not and he did.
 
This argument does my head in. Does this mean you can punch a player if they don't have possession of the ball? And why do refs give fouls when a player is blocked off/pulled back off the ball?

This argument does my head in, punching someone in the head is a criminal offence with or without the ball
 
could make a huge difference to top four bid to start with

for his "seniority" within the squad, experience etc etc and the time it happened in the match (and the time between the two yellows) Mata is by far more stupid than Coq

What difference does top four actually make to Utd....... none at all.

Utd have the financial power and potential beyond all but basically 3 other clubs. No manager nor player would turn them down because they missed out on CL for another year. Financially 40mil could mean a huge difference to clubs below Utd, but not so much to them. You're talking about them making less profit for a year rather than realistically spending loads more. They have the finances and size to borrow 40mil if there is someone they really want to buy.

top 4 for a single season makes incredibly little real world difference to Utd, not least because unless they change 70% of the squad in one transfer window they have no chance of winning it next year.
 
Utd would be 2 or 3 down if it wasn't for Smalling.

true - excluding the two yellows (which were correct), ref seem to want to allow West Brom to get away with murder while whistling against Utd for the smallest things

(ie if West Brom want to "waste" their free kick by taking it quickly and it doesn't come off, it should be up to them. Shouldn't have a 2nd chance to take it - several other instances also)
 
This argument does my head in. Does this mean you can punch a player if they don't have possession of the ball? And why do refs give fouls when a player is blocked off/pulled back off the ball?

This argument does my head in, punching someone in the head is a criminal offence with or without the ball

Strangely it's not dealt as a criminal matter on the football field. It's a foul. Just like tripping somebody when they don't have the ball ;)
 
I thought it was a harsh penalty, football is a contact sport, there has to be an element of honesty from players for the game. 1 - 1 would have been a fair result and put it this way, had that been benteke in his own box defending, he wouldnt of gone down. He would have stayed on his feet and cleared the ball or whatever. He wouldnt have risked going to ground. Harsh for palace, deserved something from that game.
 
Last edited:
What difference does top four actually make to Utd....... none at all.

Not playing in the CL next season makes no difference?

I cant believe you have even asked that

1) Attracting the best players is MUCH easier when the team is in CL (maybe Utd wont sign any anyway, but its still easier if you are due to play CL)

2) Potential for sponsors to reduce payments if Utd frequently miss CL seasons - and therefore potentially paying off the debt is harder)

3) With any squad, its better for the future of the club all the players get more meetings vs Barca / RM / Bayern etc etc rather than the 2nd rung in europe

With such relatively short careers of course footballers are going to chose CL teams above all else - and beyond that as has been seen this year the buying power of the PL as a whole has increased, so MUCH less difference between Liverpool / Stoke or who ever else affording someone and Utd - and that's only going to be closer /more non-existant in the near future
 
Someone I know got 6mths for headbutting in a Sunday League match.

I imagine it only applies to pro football but isn't there some kind of unwritten rule that unless it's an extreme case then the police don't get involved in what happens on the pitch?
 
Back
Top Bottom