• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

GT200 GTX280/260 "official specs"

crysis LMAO.

But you felt it a good enough game to gloat when some NVIDIA cards were beating the ATi lot in it?. Amazing how fast the tables turn with you isn't it?

You must have "FANBOY" tatooed across your forehead, please stop making us cringe with your silly posts.
 
What you posting the crap that is crysis up for, one dodgy game that is so badly coded it is unreal, please look at the majority of the other benches from the same site, the increase over the GTX is massive in many games, crysis LMAO.

What's up with you? You really must be a technophiliac who has love afairs with NV video cards. There's no other way to explain your weird deluded views of NV. You're worse than Psychas when he was going through his ATi *** IS BETTER THAN ANYTHING ELSE phase.
 
What's up with you? You really must be a technophiliac who has love afairs with NV video cards. There's no other way to explain your weird deluded views of NV. You're worse than Psychas when he was going through his ATi *** IS BETTER THAN ANYTHING ELSE phase.

Lol it's just golden isn't it? how he discredits Crysis like that when performance isn't as expected on new NVIDIA cards but then uses the game as a double edged sword when it shows the NVIDIA crowd beating the ATi lot. Brilliant.
 
I post facts and stay on topic, i don't abuse other members, you just troll and seem to have a severe stiffy for me so please debate the topic and not other members like you do so often.

OT, anandtech do two other resolutions and the results are very much the same, 280 creams the 8800GTX.
 
I think my next card will be an ATi one even if it's just to keep up my so-far perfect track record of alternating companies cards in my main PC's. :p

Radeon 9250 -> 6200 LE -> X1650 Pro -> 8800 GTS 320MB.

Okay not really, only because most sources indicate the 4800 series will be pretty damn good bang for buck.
 
These threads make me laugh, read from the beginning every-ones like "cant wait for this card is going to be amazing", "I'm deffantly going to get one".

Now becourse the price tag is out the roof (yes I do agree its expensive) and people cant afford them, the general conversation has changed to yeah but my 8800gt's are as quick, or I'm going to get a GX2.

I wonder if the orginal conversation of "I want one" would have continued it the GTX280 was £350 and the 260 £230!!

Most people I think are just slighty upset that they cannot afford it, at the end of the day its a single GPU that blows anything out the water with 4XAA+ and 16XAF+ @ 1660x1050 or more, lets face it like the 8800GTX its again the fastest card on the market, your going to have to pay top coinage for that!

i could probably buy one, and i suppose a few others could put themselves out of pocket for this

but what the hell is the point if its not much quicker than a GX2?

and that is the problem, its just not fast enough
 
What you posting the crap that is crysis up for, one dodgy game that is so badly coded it is unreal, please look at the majority of the other benches from the same site, the increase over the GTX is massive in many games, crysis LMAO.


The graph at that res are useless, look at 1600x1200...
I've looked at some other games, at 1600x1200 and none of them even comes near a 100% increase ( Assasins creed, CoD4, oblivion).
Even so, at 2560x1024 I've yet to see a 100% increase either...


I don't know where you get the 100% from...
 
Back
Top Bottom