• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

GTX 1060

So this nda was for a damn 'press release'? no actual reviews and games benchmarks? wtf..
Smart, really. Cards aren't ready to be sold yet, so the best avenue to take away some of AMD's sails(or sales!) is to at least announce the 1060, give some specs and rough performance target level and general pricing. Obviously they will hope that enough people will put off buying a 480 in order to at least see what the 1060 will be capable of.
 
just a quick head up, i know from Gigabytes end. Nvidia have been a lot better around this time and there's more stock of the 1060 then when the 1070/80 launched :)

dont know if this is the case for EU/UK/OCUK etc

but the general ball park
 
Bah. Needed to come in around the £200 mark or less.

nVIDIA's prices up in the stratosphere at the moment. Need a high end card from AMD to put a squeeze on things.
 
Bah. Needed to come in around the £200 mark or less.

nVIDIA's prices up in the stratosphere at the moment. Need a high end card from AMD to put a squeeze on things.

Was never going to cost less than a 480, why would it?!

It's 980 performance, in an X60 class card, with better power consumption, more perf/watt, and cheaper to boot.
 
The very idea of a founders edition with literally zero benefit to it is such an insult.

Does it even say founders edition on the box? do you even get that?

I have used nvidia only since the 260 but they are really pushing it with this bs.
 
Why, if there was something even remotely competitive we wouldn't have Fanboi Edition GPUs. Nvidia is now free too add a literally Tax for a worse part (AiB have better cooling, power control, warranty).

Perhaps it's more along the lines of neither company wanting a price war with increased costs on these smaller processes.

In other words, prices might still be higher than last gen even if both companies had their full ranges out, and the matched each other.

Can only hope that costs do come down in the longer term as things mature.

Wonder how long we'll be on 14/16nm.
 
Nvidia have just pushed everything up, all levels in one single generation jump.
More like the 970 and 960 were just very cheaply priced compared to before in an aggressive move to ward off what was close competition at the time.

Also the 960 was a fairly lousy card. $199 was probably about right for it. Was slower than a 770.
 
I miss the 6600GT pricing. Matching (even beating) the former high end for £160. That was back in the day that ATI and nVIDIA were trading blows at the high end though.

The 5x00 generation was awful though.
 
I have read a couple of articles and no mention of the 1060 being a 3GB card and it has been stated that it will be 6GB and 3GB will be a different GPU (probably the 1050/Ti).

I think nV are smart enough to know that a 3GB 1060 has *no* chance of selling.

A 3GB 1050 @ $149 is a different story.
 
GTX 660 Ti was probably the last relatively good x60 part. Certainly the last one to have better than 128 bit bus.

The GTX 460 256bit version did the job before that.

760 and 960 were both a bit underwhelming.
 
Was never going to cost less than a 480, why would it?!

It's 980 performance, in an X60 class card, with better power consumption, more perf/watt, and cheaper to boot.

I don't think the 1060 will be able to equal a 980.

I am basing this on how the other Pascal cards perform against the Maxwell cards.

For example the best 1080s on the Heaven 4 bench score about 3300 and the best 980s score about 2100.

If you half the 1080 score as the 1060 is basically half a 1080 you get a score around 1650 which is a long way short of the 980s.
 
Back
Top Bottom