• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

GTX 780 Ti Specifications Leaked – Full Blown Gk110 Core with 2880 SP

I doubt Kaap will touch the reference ones for the same reason as me - there needs to be some 4.5/6gb versions at the very least. Still very sceptical of any 12GB cards as there is no market for them other than someone like ASUS doing a very short run of them at £1,300 a card.
 
TheRealDeal said:
Was thinking the same myself but i looked at the physics score (8283) on the benchmarks and it seems these scores were done with a low end cpu. With a decent cpu the score would be pretty good but probably not as good as Scotty's.
Click to expand...

Physics score won't affect the GPU scores and I am only going on the GPU scores. So long as an I5 or more is used (which it has been), there will not be a bottleneck on the GPU scores.
 
I was also just thinking, if the 500W of power is true, surely the stock cooler is gonna be pants? It's kinda funny those graphs show against "Quiet mode 290X" (Didnt expect anything but bias when it comes to Nvidia's top cards), but thats a LOT of heat to get rid of.

Surely it's gonna be much hotter than the 290X?
 
Gregster said:
Physics score won't affect the GPU scores and I am only going on the GPU scores. So long as an I5 or more is used (which it has been), there will not be a bottleneck on the GPU scores.
Click to expand...

Yea just after i wrote that i checked the gpu score's which are very similar to what Titan is getting. I think pretty much all the released benchmarks are suspect. There is no way the ti is going to be 30% faster in bf4 and tomb raider compared to a 290x. That would put it at nearly 40% faster than a titan in bf4 as well.
 
Last edited:
The new stock cooler looks the same on the outside (Darker plex glass), but there might be improvements inside. Who knows, it's all speculation so why not speculate on this as well.
 
Hm that 780ti is overclocked whilst the other cards are at stock (in case no one noticed)
Still impressive results, AMD really need to show their hand with mantle.
 
NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-780-Ti-gaming-performance.png


According to our newest data, NVIDIA’s GeForce GTX 780 Ti is much faster than Radeon R9 290X.

This was confirmed by multiple leaks already, including synthetic benchmarks or some preliminary gaming tests. Today I have some official scores of both cards confronted with each other with the most popular gaming titles.

There are two things that you should know before making any final judgments here. First is that NVIDIA used 2560×1600 resolution for the most of these games. This is very important since AMD clearly targets 4k resolution in their tests. NVIDIA says that if you want to play on 4k resolution, then you need at least two cards in SLI.

Secondly AMD Radeon R9 290X was used in Quiet mode, this is even more important, since it would perform 8-12% better in these tests. I could have added ‘possible’ results based on this knowledge, but I didn’t want to make data out of thin air. Let’s keep it as it is. Most of you would probably use Uber mode for this comparison, but since we are talking about official scores, NVIDIA had to make sure 290X will look (much) worse.

Testing platform: Intel Core i7-3960X, Windows 8.1 64-bit, GeForce 331.70 drivers, Catalyst 13.11 Beta 8
Click to expand...

Conclusion
According to the official data NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti would perform 30% better than 290X. Of course we are looking at the numbers from NVIDIA, so it’s necessary to take these numbers with a grain of salt. I was told that in ‘real’ benchmarks GeForce GTX 780 Ti is about 20% faster than 290X in Quiet Mode. In Uber Mode R9 290X is still slower than 780 Ti, but only by 13%. If we add 4k benchmarks this number will get even better in AMD favor.
Click to expand...

So possibly 30% faster than the 290X in quiet mode. :eek:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom