GTX 780 Ti Specifications Leaked – Full Blown Gk110 Core with 2880 SP

MooMoo444 · 31 Oct 2013 at 09:46

I actually had a little giggle outloud at the suggestion SLI mirrors core along with VRAM.

Someone doesn't seem to understand the point of putting a second card in I guess.

Mei · 31 Oct 2013 at 09:53

MooMoo444 said:
I actually had a little giggle outloud at the suggestion SLI mirrors core along with VRAM.

Someone doesn't seem to understand the point of putting a second card in I guess.

that someone has two 690s!
maybe related to kaap
or maybe kaap traded them for some _____
either way its thread of the day.

spankingtexan · 31 Oct 2013 at 09:59

Marine-RX179 said:
Off topic, but I hope Intel doesn't blow all Skylake's advancement into power saving and give us the crappy 10% performance increase again...

But as I'll be coming from Haswell missing Broadwell's 10% I'll be getting 20% with Skylake coming directly from Haswell. Sorry off topic

I'm more concerned whether they sort out the IHS crappy paste.

8 Pack · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:00

Rossi~ said:
Kaap and 8 Pack have said in the past about 3 - 4 titans need extreme overclocking on 6 core 2011 processors to cure bottleneck. I'll leave this one to them tbh.

6.15ghz 4930K DDR2666 C8 still bottleneck !!!

MooMoo444 · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:05

8 Pack said:
6.15ghz 4930K DDR2666 C8 still bottleneck !!!

Get a dual CPU board!

Gregster · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:05

Fram the last page: All that anger and to be wrong

If these specs are true, it does make a mockery of the Titan's price and spiel (not that I care) but it would have been better to have all 15 SMX units working and 6 GB and everything else on 28nm to be under the Titan... Maybe I am just sour grapes because something will be out that is faster than a Titan

Yaayuh! · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:07

8 Pack said:
6.15ghz 4930K DDR2666 C8 still bottleneck !!!

Indeed. Will never stop you trying though

MooMoo444 said:
Get a dual CPU board!

You can't overclock dual xeons (any further than a couple mhz on bclk).

Mei · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:09

Gregster said:
Fram the last page: All that anger and to be wrong

If these specs are true, it does make a mockery of the Titan's price and spiel (not that I care) but it would have been better to have all 15 SMX units working and 6 GB and everything else on 28nm to be under the Titan... Maybe I am just sour grapes because something will be out that is faster than a Titan

the 290?

Gregster · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:17

Mei said:
the 290?

=XDC=FluphyBunny · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:20

V3teran said:
Typical OCUK response i see.....

When you are in SLI you only get 6GB of ram because the cards are mirrored so you are still going to run out of core clock power. Even if you had 10 cards in SLI the same rules apply.
This is the opposite of AMD cards which utilize all the ram.

Instead of trying to be smart i suggest you go read up on how Nvidia cards work because you obviously dont have a clue. I suppose your another one that gets onboard the hype train.

"Dont be a sheep my friend be a Shepherd"

Next....

That really is a gem of a post. It has indignation. It has a superiority complex. A touch of keyboard warrior. And finally complete and utter nonsense.

I love these forums

Orangey · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:21

Gregster said:

That kid has good fashion sense. :cool:

Mei · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:22

i think i recognise that kid!
did he grow up to be a video reviewer

lol

Scougar · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:24

Mr. V3teran, sorry but you are going to have eat humble pie on this one bud. Having a ferrari doesn't make you an expert with one, much like having sli/crossfire doesn't automatically make you an expert. In all seriousness, you have misunderstood the core concept of having parallel cards.

Back on topic: I really am surprised no one has suggested the specs may be nonsense, given it's a totally unknown (At least to me) news source.

Rusty0611 · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:30

=XDC=FluphyBunny said:
That really is a gem of a post. It has indignation. It has a superiority complex. A touch of keyboard warrior. And finally complete and utter nonsense.

I love these forums

Superbly summed up

. Have a pat on the back.

smilertoo · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:44

Does that mean the game engine actually processes the whole scene for each card? Sounds incredibly sloppy.

Silent_Scone · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:46

wow, what have I missed

.

Apparently someone was getting confused with the Nvidia cards that come out of Mr Magorium's wonder emporium

Craterloads · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:49

What kind of difference are we looking at between a 780 and 780ti. Guessing these will come in at around £500, with they be worth the £100+ over the 780s?

MooMoo444 · 31 Oct 2013 at 10:50

I wonder if he has those RAM modules where everything is copied to each one.

Quote has since been removed

BubbySoup · 31 Oct 2013 at 11:04

Gregster said:
Moving up to a 1440P screen has brought me back to earth. I can't see the difference between this and 1080P, so for me to jump to 4K and require 4 Titans to run it isn't happening I for sure would love a 4K TV but just not interested in another 60Hz monitor. 120Hz FTW (unless you have a 144Hz monitor and then you are just showing off)

I'm so glad someone else shares this thought - I used to think it was just me! I only use my PC to game. All my work is done on my laptop, so whilst I appreciate the extra desktop space is a no-brainer for most, if you game and do little else - maybe some surfing etc, the move to 1440p is poor at best, especially when you consider the extra gpu grunt needed for gaming at high fps over 1080p.

Silent_Scone · 31 Oct 2013 at 11:06

Yep, 1440P doesn't really offer anything new I discovered. 2560x1080 is pretty good though as it gives you a far better scope, AND it's way less pixels than 1440P so the impact on performance is minimal.