Soldato
Why did i originally post the video?
What is scary and what isn't surprising?
What is scary and what isn't surprising?
Why did i originally post the video?
The guy was widely derided for this at the time
that is essentially it
Im losing my beans because i called a spade a spade..
lol
Lol. Aw Dowie, you broke him.
1 article is widely derided apparently..
After opening with reminiscences of seeing “Brigadoon” in the West End, James explains that:
Lord James always struck me as a perfectly sensible person, but he does seem to have gone completely bonkers here. But hey, at least he’s provided years’ worth of grist for conspiracy theorists around the world. Who could this Foundation X be? Might they be related to the Rosicrucians? The Knights Templar? The Illuminati Elite? The Vatican? And what terrible fate might befall James, now that he has hinted at their shadowy existence?
- Britain needs “investment in industry”, to the tune of about £5 billion.
- He’s going to “raise a subject that I should not raise and which is going to be one which I think is now time to put on a higher awareness”.
- There is “a strange organisation which wishes to make a great deal of money available to assist the recovery of the economy in this country”, which he refers to as Foundation X.
- Foundation X has “megabucks”.
- He, Lord James, has “handled billions of pounds of terrorist money”; his “biggest terrorist client was the IRA”, who weren’t as nasty as the north African terrorists.
- As a result, he has “an interesting set of phone numbers”, which he used to “get a reference and a clearance on foundation X”.
- He has “come to the absolute conclusion that foundation X is completely genuine and sincere and that it directly wishes to make the United Kingdom one of the principal points that it will use to disseminate its extraordinarily great wealth into the world at this present moment, as part of an attempt to seek the recovery of the global economy.”
- The government — in the form of both the Bank of England and the Treasury — thinks that the whole thing is “rubbish”.
- Foundation X’s people “expect to be contacted only by someone equal to head of state status or someone with an international security rating equal to the top six people in the world”.
- They claim to have already deposited £5 billion in British banks — a claim Treasury says cannot be true.
- They claim to have more than $7 trillion in gold bullion — more than the standard figure of 5.3 billion troy ounces of gold which has been mined in human history.
- They would be happy to put up £5 billion for the UK government to invest in industry, they don’t want to control the funds, and they won’t charge interest.
- They’d also be happy to transfer £17 billion to the UK government for the Crossrail plan — before Christmas.
- Oh, and they’ll happily fund the building of hospitals and schools, too.
More likely there wasn't much, and what was would have been pretty poor quality, at least of the initial attack and exterior.@Minusorange go read a book on structural design and you'll begin to understand. Also note that parts of the upper structures did fall to the side.
Ta da.
You can't see how on a day like it was why confusion may have occurred regarding building numbers and the status? I'm pretty sure there were even reports other targets had been hit that hadn't.
The pentagon was a military structure. People generally aren't allowed to film them and a lot of the footage will likely remain confidential, again due to the nature of the structure.
You didn't clarify what you're after? I remembered it from when it was reported at the time, perhaps because I actually read the news rather than getting all my information from conspiracy sites.
A quick search reveals that it was mentioned on these forums at the time too:
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/threads/foundation-x.18203648/
Here is link to a Reuter's blog at the time it was reported:
http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/11/03/conspiracy-theory-of-the-day-foundation-x-edition/
You'll find more links in the thread above...
So what are you actually trying to clarify here? That this seemingly nutty Lord made the dubious claim? Well there is video of it already posted and now you've got several links in the thread made at the time....
This is all deflecting a bit, despite it being clear now that this guy has history for being rather gullible and making rather silly claims in the House of Lords you don't seem to have anything to say about the CT video you posted where he made similar silly claims.
Why are they all in blog form?
Have you looked through that thread. I dont see many articles. The links are all broken too
Ive no idea why youre obsessed with saying im a CT nut. Are you saying there are no conspiracies?
It's one of those almost amusing, in a sad way, type of things when you realise people who were adults at the time seem to have no memory of camcorders, film cameras, and that IIRC mobile phones with cameras didn't become available until about '02 and were sub VGA resolution so it was a very conscious choice (and often some degree of inconvenience) to have a camera on you unless there was a specific reason.
Some links are broken? Well it happened in 2010, I'm not surprised the links are broken, news sites get updated, they don't necessarily retain all content.
I'm not obsessed with saying it, you chose to post a conspiracy video, you're not able to provide anything further regarding that video and instead have focused your attention on a previous incident involving the same member of the house of Lords where it isn't particularly clear what you want.
I've not claimed there are no conspiracies. Common sense dictates that the one you posted is obviously wrong, even if you lack common sense then you could perhaps finally come to that realisation when you realise there it nothing at all to back it up.... so far you made a vague handwaving argument that the existence of some multi trillionaire is plausible because the combined wealth of the billionaires and multi millionaires of the House of Saud comes to just over a trillion???
What is the general theme, its irrelevant wether the video of 15 trillion is fake or not.
And yes, i'll never have proof that particular video is real or not. Neither do you.
Connect the dots eh.
That would be fine if it was say a motel or a garage that was struck but it was one of the most secure buildings in the entire country, you're telling me they had nothing better than the 1 frame every 5 second camera they allowed to be shown of the impact ?