Halal, is it meat you're looking for?

Yes it does unless you actual read the daily mail, or believe half the crap they publish.

In your world maybe.

http://www.lovepork.co.uk/
The Red Tractor Pork logo indicates the quality and country of origin of the pork, that it has been produced responsibly to rigorous standards, is traceable back to Red Tractor farms and independently inspected at every stage of production.
Can't go wrong with that!
 
Imported lambs from NZ have been halal for years because their biggest exports are to the middle east. Do people still have a problem?

All NZ meat is stunned including halal, unless it's changed very recently.

All the halal lamb and beef slaughtered in New Zealand is currently stunned with a head-only electrical stun.
There is substantial scientific evidence to confirm that cattle and lamb do not die from the electrical stunning and can completely recover after the stun. Slaughterers are trained to look for signs of life at the time of slaughter and the color of blood, flow of blood, and movement after the slaughter. They are authorized to immediately remove any animals from production if they have any suspicion that the animal was weak or not alive at the time of slaughter.

So no there isn't any issue, unless the rules have changed.
Why we can't do the same is mind boggling. there should be no exceptions granted for non stunning.
 
Why cant people separate their own "indifference" and appreciate other people can find it abhorrent?

That's what is so stupid about these replies... its "i don't care so why should you?" over and over and over.

Some people care. Like some people care enough to follow a religion that says you cant eat pork or your cow has to bleed to death.

Both sides are vocal minorities.
 
It was the fact it was halal that was the problem, in the main.

Doesn't look like that in this thread. There are some against halal totally, but the majority, my self included is the non stunning exceptions granted by the UI, for roughly 10% of halal meat.
And the poor labelling.
 
Can you give any evidence on Muslims wanting 'they own way' all the time?




It was the fact it was halal that was the problem, in the main.

They are making demands all the time man

Muslim protesters take to London's streets to demand shops stop selling alcohol

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/muslim-brick-lane-protest-muslim-2926404#ixzz31IuWqE5j
Follow us: @DailyMirror on Twitter | DailyMirror on Facebook


Muslims demand gay marriage exemption

Muslim Council of Britain says it is appalled by 'utterly discriminatory' legislation on same-sex marriage

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2012/dec/18/muslims-demand-gay-marriage-exemption

BIRMINGHAM: Up to 25,000 British Pakistani men, women and children from across the UK gathered in Aston Park here to express their love for Hazrat Muhammad (peace be upon him) and to call on the British government to introduce legislation that bars Islamophobes from insulting Islam under the garb of the freedom of speech.

http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-Ne...ly-in-UK-to-demand-end-to-anti-Islam-speeches

It would probably be easier for you to produce a list of things that muslims in the UK haven't demanded...?
 
Whilst I agree with that, the threads we've had recently have been more about hatred of Muslims and them being seen to impose their requirements. Whether true if not doesn't matter to these people.

Stun all animals, say any words you want while they are stunned. I see no difference, and don't understand those that do.

[edit]this was aimed at Glaucus. This thread is about halal meat. I don't see why alcohol sales are linked.
 
Stun all animals, say any words you want while they are stunned. I see no difference, and don't understand those that do.

The point is not all are stunned. And as halal isn't required to be labelled you can't easily avoid it.

Only kosher and halal can get exceptions to not stun.

This is the big issue and is what the majority of this thread is.
 
Whilst I agree with that, the threads we've had recently have been more about hatred of Muslims and them being seen to impose their requirements. Whether true if not doesn't matter to these people.

Stun all animals, say any words you want while they are stunned. I see no difference, and don't understand those that do.

[edit]this was aimed at Glaucus. This thread is about halal meat. I don't see why alcohol sales are linked.

It's not a hatred against muslims for asking, I think its the hatred that our own country tends to cave into the demands. But the more muslims you have in a country, the bigger voice they will have and the more emboldened they will feel to make more demands. By allowing the demands to get through we are showing that we are weak and are making the country more attractive to more muslims, taking us back to the start. So it snowballs and then suddenly you find yourself with a population that feels it can demand anything, based soley on religious ground, trampling over other peoples human rights, and laws that had been put in place to best protect the animals themselves.

For me the problem is a physical one and a societal one at the same time, and only focusing on the 'is it stunned is it not stunned' element completely ignores the wider issues of paving the way for yet more demands and a bigger voice to be heard and appeased. Making uk food halal as standard completely ignores animal welfare and it lays down the foundation for further islamification. This isn't rocket science - what I don't understand is that you are all intelligent people here, how can you either ignore both of these issues and hide behind a stance that you don't care either way?
 
Explain that to badcompany et al.

[edit]islamification. See? TRM isn't interested in the stunning element Glaucus. They don't want halal because its halal. It's not about stunning.
 
Explain that to badcompany et al.

You always get some, this is GD, and well general public will probably have a similar proportion.

Making stuff halal is not ignoring animal welfare as 90% is no different to normal meat. Other than a prayer.

There is also no need for it to become standard if it was labelled,
This is not a Muslim shouting thing, this is a business cost choice. Thanks to poor labelling regulations.
The vast majority do not care that it's stunned, all the big muslim bodies agree stunning is fine as the animal is still alive. Hence 90% uk halal meat production is stunned, 100% of NZ meat production is stunned.
 
Last edited:
It's not a hatred against muslims for asking, I think its the hatred that our own country tends to cave into the demands. But the more muslims you have in a country, the bigger voice they will have and the more emboldened they will feel to make more demands.

This is the way I see it tbh.

For me it's not so much an issue with the methods used, it's more about how as a society we somehow feel obliged, to irreversibly alter aspects of the food production process - for a minority and for *supernatural reasons* which pretty much don't exist.
 
Explain that to badcompany et al.

[edit]islamification. See? TRM isn't interested in the stunning element Glaucus. They don't want halal because its halal. It's not about stunning.

I'm afraid to say, halal cannot be stunned. That's why the lamb from NZ isnt sold as being halal, although it was killed in some ways associated to halal they cannot label it as such.

But by even talking about the religious element of this and when considering the halal requirement is one of pure pandering to a religious entity, what about everyone who isn't a muslim? You are effectively dismissing their religious credence, if you're not a muslim then by defacto you don't think halal is right and why should your food have been blessed to another god. this might deeply anger your own god, in whatever religious you happen to believe in. if you are so keen to allow halal to be sold un marked or by defacto in schools, then the religious sensitive's of every other non muslim group is being completely ignored and walked all over.

This is my point. The moderate ones amongst us care only about welfare of the animals, etc. these others care more about 'sending them back'.

That's because you've already been conditioned to think that Islam is a special case and should overrule law, animal welfare rights and all other religions? Not once in my thread did I say send anyone back. that is a highly offensive and borderline racist accusation.
 
I'm afraid to say, halal cannot be stunned. That's why the lamb from NZ isnt sold as being halal, although it was killed in some ways associated to halal they cannot label it as such.

But by even talking about the religious element of this and when considering the halal requirement is one of pure pandering to a religious entity, what about everyone who isn't a muslim? You are effectively dismissing their religious credence, if you're not a muslim then by defacto you don't think halal is right and why should your food have been blessed to another god. this might deeply anger your own god, in whatever religious you happen to believe in. if you are so keen to allow halal to be sold un marked or by defacto in schools, then the religious sensitive's of every other non muslim group is being completely ignored and walked all over.

Removed. Please refrain from any insults. JG
 
Its easy to identify the ones that simply want to 'send them back' - its the same people yabbering on in the same 'muslamic' threads. I've learnt to ignore these trolls as they just re-iterate the same bigoted views over and over again, but in different threads and are not actually interested in debate - but just getting their bigoted views across - seems they think saying the same thing the loudest they win, lol.
 
Back
Top Bottom