mumsnet....so much bitchiness on here that it's almost sexual
Just GD, the rest of the forum is still useable. Too many bitter racist nerds to talk about anything other than a specialised topic.
mumsnet....so much bitchiness on here that it's almost sexual
Have you passed the test?... Let me tell you about my mother .
you've cracked it he's a replicant
Just GD, the rest of the forum is still useable. Too many bitter racist nerds to talk about anything other than a specialised topic.
OcUK even GD is one of the least psychotics forums left. Other sites are flooded with conspractists and one topic posters to the point of being unusable.
exactly, the impartial by-standers are the best - nothing to see there
Harry doubling down on enemy he killed comments - important to be honest with respect to mental health, even suicide concerns in soldiers - but, as reported, so far, he didn't say that in the book,
he's putting his invictus involvement in jeopardy.
I was listening to The Rest is Politics podcast this morning and they touched on this briefly. They mentioned that this story came out years ago and the papers that now condemn him called him a hero. Amazing how their opinion can change when the spin requires it to do so.
Outrage
Hero
They are not actually the same story though.I was listening to The Rest is Politics podcast this morning and they touched on this briefly. They mentioned that this story came out years ago and the papers that now condemn him called him a hero. Amazing how their opinion can change when the spin requires it to do so.
Outrage
Hero
They are not actually the same story though.
The "hero" story you are talking about is him admitting to killing taliban fighters, something that is to be expected in a warzone. The focus is on the phrase "you take a life to save a life". The outrage from what I can see is that it seems like he is "bragging" about how many he has killed while he was out there.
Maybe the hero stories does put a number on how many people have been killed but it isn't obvious from your blurry screenshots.
They may be on the same topic, but these are not the same story, from the evidence you have presented.
The outrage from what I can see is that it seems like he is "bragging" about how many he has killed while he was out there.
It sounds quite well written. I've no interest in the book or the whole story tbh, it does show the British press in glowing light of brown.
But he isn't bragging about it. That is just the spin. I wouldn't normally post James O'Brian but he reads the section of the book and its not bragging when spun by someone else.
Oh dear.Fixed that for you.
Fixed that for you.
Written by someone else. Everyone will spin things for their own narrative, will they not?So that isn't what is actually written in the book? That is your spin on it. Its like the prefect example of cognitive dissonance.
Written by someone else. Everyone will spin things for their own narrative, will they not?
So I put "bragging" in quotes because I couldn't think of the right word at the time. What I wanted to put was crass at the time.But he isn't bragging about it. That is just the spin. I wouldn't normally post James O'Brian but he reads the section of the book and its not bragging when its in context.
It sounds quite well written. I've no interest in the book or the whole story tbh, it does show the British press in glowing light of brown.