Associate
I currently have a Dell U2410, which in the review has an input lag of 14.4ms and a maximum of 20ms in Gaming Mode; the Hazro HZ30Wie has a dramatically lower average input lag, with a maximum of 5ms. But that has to be balanced with the response rate, which came out well but slightly behind some of the other IPS panels. I'm not interested in TN-panels, so 120Hz isn't an option for me. The Dell U3011 is more expensive, has considerably higher input lag (more than my current monitor) and been criticised for the anti-glare - but I just want to check I'm not dismissing it unfairly. Colour accuracy isn't critical for me, so I likely won't be turning the backlight down too low. I do the occasional bit of website design and basic image design, as well managing photos from my phone. So:any questions, please do ask
1) Is the Hazro HZ30Wie actually a good monitor for gaming?
2) Is the anti-glare coating as noticeable as that on Dell monitors?
3) Is the backlight flicker a problem if the brightness is not at the lowest level?
4) How serious is the lack of sRGB emulation?
5) Was the lack of any reference to dead pixels simply because there weren't any?
I bought a Hazro HZ27WC recently but had to return it due to dead pixels. I got a confirmation from OcUK that I'm getting a refund. It was a really nice monitor, though the pixel density was noticeably higher than I'm used to - which is both a good and a bad thing. The lack of anti-glare coating improved the image quality but increased reflections. Obviously it's cheaper, so that works in its favour. Any preference? I can either buy another HZ27WC or go for the HZ30Wie, unless there is a better 1440p/1600p for gaming.
I really don't know what to do.
PS - I hope that wasn't too many questions. And I hope the questions weren't to amateur.