OK it comes from Korea, but even then you'd probably get better returns support than Hazro
Cancel and go for the Yamakasi CATLEAP Q270 that's being discussed in the other thread
I have the Hazro 27" WD, paid £450 for it but I know if something happens I'm going to be in big trouble actually getting Hazro to do anything about it.
Yes. I've been monitoring (excuse the pun) the Catleap thread over the last few days. I would prefer to take a chance on a Hazro. At least if there's a problem with it when I first switch it on then I only need to return it to OcUK instead of Korea. If it fails some time after that, well I guess I will just have to take my chances and hope Hazro's customer service improves. I've always got my trusty Hanns G HZ281HPB as a backup
My Hazro HZ30Wie arrived today and I have to say that I'm very impressed. No dead pixels, a very stable and attractive stand (in comparison to the HZ27WC), an anti-glare coating that is perfectly acceptable (much better than the Dell U2410) and excellent gaming performance. It was incredible playing Skyrim at 2560x1600 with maxed out settings and silky smooth framerates.
I'm very happy with my choice so far, though I've only had it a few hours. It was definitely worth the extra money over the HZ27WC.
I haven't got BF3 but I've played Team Fortress 2, Bulletstorm, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Super Street Fighter IV, Far Cry 2 and F1 2011, all of which perform excellently. No noticeable blur or lag and the response time is improved from the U2410, which I was also happy gaming on.Nice to read a small review like this when I'm looking around for a 30" monitor that can replace my benq xl2410t.
Have you tried any "faster" games like bf3?
I haven't got BF3 but I've played Team Fortress 2, Bulletstorm, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Super Street Fighter IV, Far Cry 2 and F1 2011, all of which perform excellently. No noticeable blur or lag and the response time is improved from the U2410, which I was also happy gaming on.
The colours out of the box are excellent, at least by my standards. Certainly better than the Dell U2410 I had before. I can notice colours that I couldn't previously, which I didn't expect. I don't do any graphical work professionally or anything, though I do the odd bit of website design and image design - it's fine for my usage.
As for 3x30" monitors... that really is an impressive aim! I can certainly see the benefit if you're doing a lot of graphic / website design, though I'm fine with just the two screens (30" for gaming/desktop, a 42" LED HDTV for media viewing).
Hehe. I know what the upgrade itch is like... sometimes you can't really explain it, you just really want to have it.Then we will see if the 3x30" will ever happen, I don't need it since I'm only play games and surf the web and watch movies sometimes. But just for the fun of it I would like to have it .
That means I have to get other gpu's, but that's another story .
Hehe. I know what the upgrade itch is like... sometimes you can't really explain it, you just really want to have it.
I just hope you're not expecting to game on all three, as even a couple of top-end GPUs will struggle with 7680x1600. That's 12.2 millions pixels! A 1080p display only has 2 million - that's 83% less pixels.
Yeah, I think you'll need at least 3x 680s... just one is pushing it for 2560x1600, let alone 3x that.But... But... I really want to!!
Waiting for the 680 4Gb with watercooling and then hopefully it will work.
Maybe use my 580 3Gb for physX. Or sell it and buy like three 680 .
Yeah, I think you'll need at least 3x 680s... just one is pushing it for 2560x1600, let alone 3x that.
nope perko
im now running 2 680's on 3 30" hazro monitors and haveing no problems with games the 4gb isnt needed at all at present.
Im getting full 60fps with vsnc on in skyrim with everything maxed out on ultra but i am only running 2x AA
can get 70fps with most thing maxed out in batman and battlefield 3 runs flawleslly on 2 680's so i would say that two is more than enough.