We disagree on the subject. It may be the heart of the matter to you but other people have differing views and drives to yourselfNo. At the heart of this issue, the question is whether each of us will accept the benefits of proven medical science, or ignore it and put our children at risk.
People are still free to make their own decisions about the healthcare of their children. They simply have to accept that there may be unpleasant consequences.
'vaccines are safer than other medications' that's makes it a ok then love the logic there. again it's MY and YOUR choice as to what goes into your body and i dont need to to justify it to who is WE?Fine.
In that case don't go to the GP next time you have an infection, after all what does the medical profession know about diseases that you don't.
you are far more likely to have a reaction to some of the antibiotics than you are to a vaccine, and what's the worst that can happen if you get a bad infection, well apart from death.
Vaccines are safer than many other medications, and if you're worried about them then you really don't want to take painkillers, antibiotics, let alone ever have a sedative.
We would just like you to admit that you're also risking others with your decision and take appropriate steps, I hear the Shetland Isles are nice this time of year...
i choose NOT to have a cocktail of foreign bodies injected into me and any of your so called experts, reviews, tests claims or whatever they do to justify in doing to so means nothing to me. and i should not be punished for it.
that's is my free will and choice simples. people seem to have a hard time accepting this, if you choose to have a vaccine or chemo or NOT or take whatever pill or NOT that is YOUR choice. i and nobody else have the right to punish you or cause you a hardship for doing so.So do you reject all medicine then? Or is there some selective irrationality going on whereby you'll accept the risk of side effects for say some drugs but you'll not for vaccines?
Lets put it really really simply.'vaccines are safer than other medications' that's makes it a ok then love the logic there. again it's MY and YOUR choice as to what goes into your body and i dont need to to justify it to who is WE?
that's is my free will and choice simples. people seem to have a hard time accepting this, if you choose to have a vaccine or chemo or NOT or take whatever pill or NOT that is YOUR choice. i and nobody else have the right to punish you or cause you a hardship for doing so.
to reject all allopathic medicine out of hand would be a little foolhardy so no i don't.I'm well aware it is your free choice - however you're avoiding the question, why is that exactly? I'm presuming because you have an obviously inconsistent position.
to reject all allopathic medicine out of hand would be a little foolhardy so no i don't.
but to consider it a one stop shop us v them mentality and to punish men and women who choose not to be vaccinated is wrong imo.
to reject all allopathic medicine out of hand would be a little foolhardy so no i don't.
but to consider it a one stop shop us v them mentality and to punish men and women who choose not to be vaccinated is wrong imo.
to reject all allopathic medicine out of hand would be a little foolhardy so no i don't.
but to consider it a one stop shop us v them mentality and to punish men and women who choose not to be vaccinated is wrong imo.
to reject all allopathic medicine out of hand would be a little foolhardy so no i don't.
but to consider it a one stop shop us v them mentality and to punish men and women who choose not to be vaccinated is wrong imo.
ha good one yeah at 10 yrs old, and no i have not traveled to such places.You didn't reject your vaccines either, you got them.
You're missing a massive total of none! unless you've travelled and decided to go places where it is recommended you get various things and didn't.
Have you travelled to such places?
that is the correct term for it what you want me to do?the use of that phrase is telling and perhaps highlights where your irrationality is coming from - it is a term used by believers of 'woo'/'alternative medicine' types
Where do you draw the line then - I take it you never take painkillers? I mean surely it would be crazy to expose yourself to the side effects of paracetamol for a mere headache if you're averse to exposing yourself to side effects to avoid life threatening illnesses?
that is the correct term for it what you want me to do?
jeez this is your life or what! i'm done in here, it's like lemmings.. if you cannot get through life without taking drugs for everything then that's sadnot really - it is a term used by believers in/practitioners of 'woo'
anyway you've not explained where you draw the line re: actual evidence based medicine or 'allopathic medicine' as you call it?
Do you use pain killers? Antibiotics? Would you have an X-ray? At what point do you start using it?
I really think you should learn how to use apostrophes before moving on to something as advanced as chemistry.if you are not concerned about chick embryo's tesco's or otherwise, monkey kidney cells, human diploid cells or fetal rhesus monkey lung cells and things of that nature being used as a medium in your vaccine's then fine that's your choice but it does not mean i am, irrelevant what dose you claim is safe.
as above if you think that's a ok for for you then great, it's my choice not to have this foreign material injected into me and i should not be punished for it.
.Talks about wanting a world with stronger/better genetics whilst displaying below average intelligence, hmmmm