Helicopter ditches in North Sea (Ditching Aug23 2013) - Public Inquiry

Being reported as a Super Puma, but not the particular model. If it's a repeat of the EC225 issues, I can't see that particular model flying again in the North Sea.
 
If this proves to be another mechanical failure then surely it's the end for super pumas in the North Sea?

You'd think so, they only went back into operational service a few months back, even then many were sceptical about using them. But it depends what caused it to ditch, could have been anything.

Edit: Didn't realise OcUK had so many members up this end :)
 
Nah, there's at least 3 different versions of the Super Puma in service, so it'll depend what caused it and if it's common to all models.
 
The Unions will kick up a hell of a stink about it I would imagine, and rightfully so, I would imagine trust and safety record is a paramount concern in that business.
The unions know not to kick up too much of a stink about it as it'll cost hundreds if not thousands of jobs.
 
As in shore based support services?
Not just the shore based services, but the non-essential offshore work that goes on and the shore based services to support it. If they force the removal of aircraft then it just won't be possible to get everyone that works offshore, offshore. When the EC225s were grounded 100s lost their jobs offshore.
 
From another forum.

Re: Helicopter ditches in North Sea
The chopper was coming from the Alwyn, im on here the now and ive just been told this

Quote:
Originally Posted by wickbear
Do you know if it was direct from NAB mate or via DUN too? Fingers x'd they get them all.
5 left North Alwyn, the rest were the Dunbar mate

Supposedly three unaccounted for.
 
I remember seeing the hardcore firefighting training going on with 1/2 a plane on fire. Those guys are hardcore!

we had to do our working at heights training with the onsite firefighters, they told us that if they can't get to the plane in under 3 minutes it's too late as the aluminum structure will have started burning and then it's too late to put it out.
 
Not just the shore based services, but the non-essential offshore work that goes on and the shore based services to support it. If they force the removal of aircraft then it just won't be possible to get everyone that works offshore, offshore. When the EC225s were grounded 100s lost their jobs offshore.

Alternative aircraft?
 
Alternative aircraft?
There isn't a pile of spare choppers sitting around not being used. When the last lot were grounded, they managed to get some from down South and Norway but even then they had to get some S92s from Sikorsky and that took months to arrive.
 
There isn't a pile of spare choppers sitting around not being used. When the last lot were grounded, they managed to get some from down South and Norway but even then they had to get some S92s from Sikorsky and that took months to arrive.

I'm surprised that there is such a lack of supply. It does seem more frequent than what you would expect, these failures and accidents, so it would be nice to see some of the record investment the sector has drawn in to be reflected in providing more robust and reliable aircraft.

That may be a bit of a hope as we stand, but it's certainly a point I'd be making if I was involved in O&G Trade Unionism.
 
we had to do our working at heights training with the onsite firefighters, they told us that if they can't get to the plane in under 3 minutes it's too late as the aluminum structure will have started burning and then it's too late to put it out.

thats a bit of a worry considering they take about 30 mins to come to a block fire
 
I'm surprised that there is such a lack of supply. It does seem more frequent than what you would expect, these failures and accidents, so it would be nice to see some of the record investment the sector has drawn in to be reflected in providing more robust and reliable aircraft.

That may be a bit of a hope as we stand, but it's certainly a point I'd be making if I was involved in O&G Trade Unionism.
Efficiency forces you down the route of having as little spare capacity as possible unfortunately.

we had to do our working at heights training with the onsite firefighters, they told us that if they can't get to the plane in under 3 minutes it's too late as the aluminum structure will have started burning and then it's too late to put it out.
I've heard the same thing as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom