Homosexual Colours

Imagine attacking public homosexual behaviour and leaving out the point that hetero couples do it all the time and then claiming to not be a homophobe.

hand on a ladies bum? Entirely acceptable. Man on another mans bum? HOW DARE THEY!

This is some sort of motte and bailey argument. The other poster was talking about this:

As an example of what I'm talking about, why does a guy need to parade through the middle of a city centre in the middle of the day wearing bright pink leather assless chaps whilst straddling a guy in a full vinyl leather gimp suit?

that's pretty sexualized and open to criticism regardless of the genders or sexes of the people involved.

You've defended been blase about that, been called out, and have retreated/pivoted to: "hand on bum".
 
The difference is you tend not to get parades or prime-time TV shows focused on inappropriate heterosexual behaviour. Tbh you might have to give us some examples of what you mean.
As an example of what I'm talking about, why does a guy need to parade through the middle of a city centre in the middle of the day wearing bright pink leather assless chaps whilst straddling a guy in a full vinyl leather gimp suit?
Absolutely, let me pick one example (I have a few) because I don't want to derail this thread with an entirely different topic. I'll also use very broad strokes because, again, I don't want to derail things.

Parents who have messy breakups/divorces, or better yet stay together "for the children". My God, I think it is the single most effective way to **** up a child and still be legal.

I get it, relationships break down, people change etc, but the behaviour I have seen men and women do in this situation is absolutely shocking. I have seen, both as a child and now as an adult,

* a parent complain and whinge about the ex in front of their children (putting in mildly)
* parents who refused to communicate with each other and only exchange messages through the intermediary child
* parents who sulked for days over minute things that annoyed them
* parents who wouldn't even come to the door when taking a child between households

and I came from a relatively stable family! This is purely stuff I've seen through friends and extended family. I have no doubt there are people on this forum have worse personal stories to tell.

At some point these people decided to have a child together, Now they're acting worse than the child they're meant to raise! It is such a terrible example these people are setting for their children. In my fantasy world of infinite resources, this would be classified as child abuse and their should be severe repercussions for doing this. Of course it isn't because it is so common it's completely unenforceable.

To be clear I am not saying all divorces end this way, a lot end amicably which is the best of a bad situation. Also, I know sometimes people do unforgivable things that mean they deserve to be treated harshly by the other partner. However, in my experience most relationships end with neither party being squeaky clean. In general, if you can't treat the person you decided to have a child with with the most basic level of dignity and respect then you shouldn't be raising children.

Rant over :), you can carry on complaining about pride.
 
Absolutely, let me pick one example (I have a few) because I don't want to derail this thread with an entirely different topic. I'll also use very broad strokes because, again, I don't want to derail things.

Parents who have messy breakups/divorces, or better yet stay together "for the children". My God, I think it is the single most effective way to **** up a child and still be legal.

I get it, relationships break down, people change etc, but the behaviour I have seen men and women do in this situation is absolutely shocking. I have seen, both as a child and now as an adult,

* a parent complain and whinge about the ex in front of their children (putting in mildly)
* parents who refused to communicate with each other and only exchange messages through the intermediary child
* parents who sulked for days over minute things that annoyed them
* parents who wouldn't even come to the door when taking a child between households

and I came from a relatively stable family! This is purely stuff I've seen through friends and extended family. I have no doubt there are people on this forum have worse personal stories to tell.

At some point these people decided to have a child together, Now they're acting worse than the child they're meant to raise! It is such a terrible example these people are setting for their children. In my fantasy world of infinite resources, this would be classified as child abuse and their should be severe repercussions for doing this. Of course it isn't because it is so common it's completely unenforceable.

To be clear I am not saying all divorces end this way, a lot end amicably which is the best of a bad situation. Also, I know sometimes people do unforgivable things that mean they deserve to be treated harshly by the other partner. However, in my experience most relationships end with neither party being squeaky clean. In general, if you can't treat the person you decided to have a child with with the most basic level of dignity and respect then you shouldn't be raising children.

Rant over :), you can carry on complaining about pride.
Wtf has that got to do with heterosexuality? Pretty sure gay parents can and do do the same.
 
Wtf has that got to do with heterosexuality? Pretty sure gay parents can and do do the same.
They can, but clearly it is a bigger problem in the heterosexual world than the homosexual one, purely by numbers if nothing else. I mean, by your argument my counter to your point of gays wearing "pink leather assless chaps" is that in pride straight people participate and I'm sure there is at least one example of one ending up in a state of undress.
 
They can, but clearly it is a bigger problem in the heterosexual world than the homosexual one, purely by numbers if nothing else. I mean, by your argument my counter to your point of gays wearing "pink leather assless chaps" is that in pride straight people participate and I'm sure there is at least one example of one ending up in a state of undress.

Right, you've just countered your own point. I don't think you've actually understood the argument.
I'll state it again, why is it when it comes to minority events that behaviour is acceptable from them that would not ordinarily be acceptable?
 
This is a really strange thread. Children are subjected to sexualised imagery constantly from loads of things, especially things like pop videos.

Most music videos have countless women tweaking in virtually nothing.Most gay pride parades have nothing on them.
 
This is a really strange thread. Children are subjected to sexualised imagery constantly from loads of things, especially things like pop videos.

Most music videos have countless women tweaking in virtually nothing.Most gay pride parades have nothing on them.

I would imagine most parents are happy for their children to lust after a member of the opposite sex, I have yet to meet an honest one who claims finding their kid is a homosexual made their day. I think next time someone asks me why I have homophobic tendencies I'll just direct them to this thread, where a homosexual says a parent should lie to their child when it asks what men are doing when it sees them simulating buggery on a carnival float and tell them "They are just dressing up".
 
where a homosexual says a parent should lie to their child when it asks what men are doing when it sees them simulating buggery on a carnival float and tell them "They are just dressing up".

I think this is one of the most beautiful pieces of text ever written
 
Right, you've just countered your own point. I don't think you've actually understood the argument.
I'll state it again, why is it when it comes to minority events that behaviour is acceptable from them that would not ordinarily be acceptable?
I understood it perfectly thank you :), you missed my point.

I never contested that sexual behaviour happens at pride, one of the whole points is to celebrate sexual diversity. I am absolutely sure you have attended many prides in your life and saw this "pink leather assless chaps" individual yourself.

My point was that homophobic people use this point as a "won't somebody think of the children!" argument. If you take the opportunity to criticise the behaviour of some at pride, I'm going to take the opportunity to criticise the significant minority of heterosexual people who actually harm their children on a continuing basis in a legal manner and is deemed acceptable in our heteronormative society.

I would imagine most parents are happy for their children to lust after a member of the opposite sex, I have yet to meet an honest one who claims finding their kid is a homosexual made their day. I think next time someone asks me why I have homophobic tendencies I'll just direct them to this thread, where a homosexual says a parent should lie to their child when it asks what men are doing when it sees them simulating buggery on a carnival float and tell them "They are just dressing up".
Trust me, a parent's negative reaction to a child coming out will do far more damage to a child than anything they could see at pride.
 
I understood it perfectly thank you :), you missed my point.

I never contested that sexual behaviour happens at pride, one of the whole points is to celebrate sexual diversity. I am absolutely sure you have attended many prides in your life and saw this "pink leather assless chaps" individual yourself.

My point was that homophobic people use this point as a "won't somebody think of the children!" argument. If you take the opportunity to criticise the behaviour of some at pride, I'm going to take the opportunity to criticise the significant minority of heterosexual people who actually harm their children on a continuing basis in a legal manner and is deemed acceptable in our heteronormative society.


Trust me, a parent's negative reaction to a child coming out will do far more damage to a child than anything they could see at pride.

Again, as I've already said, the damaging behaviour you describe is equally attributable to homosexual parents and is not acceptable in either instance. I'll repeat again to see if it clicks, why is behaviour tolerated from minority groups that is not acceptable in wider society?
 
Again, as I've already said, the damaging behaviour you describe is equally attributable to homosexual parents and is not acceptable in either instance. I'll repeat again to see if it clicks, why is behaviour tolerated from minority groups that is not acceptable in wider society?
We appear to be going around in circles.

The behaviour I described is clearly endemic in heteronormative culture and not a homosexual one, how many gay couples do you think have children? I also strongly refute it is not deemed acceptable in society, but let's not derail the thread on that.

Again, to stress this point, if you are saying the problem I outlined is equally attributable to gays and straight people then the behaviour of people at pride is equally attributable to straight people as well as gays, because lots straight allies attend. For all you know that guy you saw could be straight!
 
We appear to be going around in circles.

The behaviour I described is clearly endemic in heteronormative culture and not a homosexual one, how many gay couples do you think have children? I also strongly refute it is not deemed acceptable in society, but let's not derail the thread on that.

Again, to stress this point, if you are saying the problem I outlined is equally attributable to gays and straight people then the behaviour of people at pride is equally attributable to straight people as well as gays, because lots straight allies attend. For all you know that guy you saw could be straight!

Could well be straight but it's a minority focused event and it's incredibly unlikely from his behaviour he was straight...but perhaps all of those people doing such things at pride events and carnivals etc are just saboteurs.

And yes, I'm sure absolutely no gay couple has ever harmed their children.

Star Hobson...Liam Fee...
 
I would imagine most parents are happy for their children to lust after a member of the opposite sex
Man with worrying opinions on almost everything in 'lusty children, parents love it' omnishambles.

And lol @ dis - are you permanently angry about the gays, the dogs, the people in general, and other issues? It can't be healthy my dude.
 
Could well be straight but it's a minority focused event and it's incredibly unlikely from his behaviour he was straight...but perhaps all of those people doing such things at pride events and carnivals etc are just saboteurs.
Of course it is an absurd argument, that is my point :). I wasn't seriously suggesting that the person you saw was straight. So please accept that it is equally absurd to suggest that the problem I raised equally impacts the gay and straight communities, it simply doesn't.
And yes, I'm sure absolutely no gay couple has ever harmed their children.

Star Hobson...Liam Fee...
Please don't present strawman arguments. My issue was comparing one culturally acceptable event (pride) to another (messy breakups), not criminal behaviour.

Anyway, I'm out. I think I made my point.
 
Of course it is an absurd argument, that is my point :). I wasn't seriously suggesting that the person you saw was straight. So please accept that it is equally absurd to suggest that the problem I raised equally impacts the gay and straight communities, it simply doesn't.

Please don't present strawman arguments. My issue was comparing one culturally acceptable event (pride) to another (messy breakups), not criminal behaviour.

Anyway, I'm out. I think I made my point.

Yes, you brought in a completely irrelevant point. A breakup is a personal event between a couple, their sexuality is moot. It has no bearing on it. I've already explained this to you. It didn't sink in.
You then tried for some reason and with no supporting evidence to claim I was wrong and that somehow heterosexual couples breaking up is worse for children. If someone built the scarecrow, that would be you with your original inane claim.

So, now on to the point again that you still haven't addressed. Why is it acceptable for some minority groups (or seemingly their supporters since apparently they're probably straight according to you) to exhibit behaviour in public that wouldn't be accepted by others?
 
I'll repeat again to see if it clicks, why is behaviour tolerated from minority groups that is not acceptable in wider society?
What behaviour is this, exactly?
I don't think there's anything I've seen at Pride events that I've not seen from people holidaying on the various 'party islands' like Ibiza, Pag, Magaluf, etc... Pride sometimes has slightly more colourful outfits and is often more creative about it, but I've seen the same, and far worse, over in the Straight camp.
 
Back on topic, mainly because I can't be bothered to read the whole thread, but this is hardly surprising. In fact I'm surprised rainbow patterned things aren't already banned in Saudi.

The rainbow patterned is ubiquitous with gay pride. Just check <insert any corporate here> during pride month.

They're not banning rainbows. They're banning the support for gay pride. It's no different to the Christian fish, Confederate flag, swastika etc.

Saying it's ridiculous it's underestimating both the power of the gay pride rainbow and the underlying backwards, regressive nature of SA.

Some of the comments and stereotypes here laughing at the decision are also homophobic.

Qatar this winter will be really interesting. Wales have already said half their backroom staff aren't traveling after qualifying. I'll be really surprised if not a single team doesn't walk out with rainbow armbands.
 
What behaviour is this, exactly?
I don't think there's anything I've seen at Pride events that I've not seen from people holidaying on the various 'party islands' like Ibiza, Pag, Magaluf, etc... Pride sometimes has slightly more colourful outfits and is often more creative about it, but I've seen the same, and far worse, over in the Straight camp.

I don't really understand the point being made with these arguments.

[but X thing is also bad/much worse]

So what? That doesn't negate the thing being complained about, does it?
 
I don't really understand the point being made with these arguments.

[but X thing is also bad/much worse]

So what? That doesn't negate the thing being complained about, does it?
Perhaps I should have made clearer that that the Straight behaviour is more common, being not limited to just one day a year, and seems far more tolerated than that of their Prideful brethren.
The point is that one annual event is getting criticised over behaviours for which an entire ongoing culture as part of wider society is infamous. It's a double standard.
Surely the more appropriate approach is to tackle the behaviour itself throughout society, instead of homing in on single instances?
 
I don't really understand the point being made with these arguments.

[but X thing is also bad/much worse]

So what? That doesn't negate the thing being complained about, does it?
It reminds me of when I was a kid and my sister would get caught doing something wrong. She'd always bring up something I'd done to try and save her own hide.
 
Back
Top Bottom