• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

i9 9900k pricing

This thread is titled "9900k pricing" LOL! You somehow think comments about value are trolling?? Unbelievable.

A Ferrari isn't within 10% performance of a Ford Fiesta. What a ridiculous thing to say. And you're ignoring the resolution factor in all this, given at 1440p/UW/4K, that performance difference diminishes significantly.

MOST people consider value, and again in a thread about the pricing of a CPU, please don't call me stupid for raising this point... it couldn't be more relevant, and it's laughable you would even suggest otherwise. You clearly don't consider value, but that's your right. But again, that 10-15% difference is ONLY at 1080p. If someone isn't at that resolution, then it's even worse value. And if you ARE at that resolution, unless you're a competitive gamer who NEEDS those extra frames, then it's mostly pointless, outside of bragging rights or an enthusiast who just wants a CPU at 5GHz for the sake of it.

Please stop talking about IQ range when you can't even type properly, it's embarassing.

Legend, can i ask....

9600k is £290
8700k is £399
9700k is £499
9900k is £599

What price point was the 9900k to come in at ?
 
Legend, can i ask....

9600k is £290
8700k is £399
9700k is £499
9900k is £599

What price point was the 9900k to come in at ?


Some corrections:


Intel Core i7-8700K 3.7GHz (Coffee Lake) Socket LGA1151 Processor - OEM @ £374.99 inc VAT https://www.overclockers.co.uk/inte...e-socket-lga1151-processor-oem-cp-64c-in.html



CM8068403358220, Hex Core with Hyperthreading Technology, 3.70GHz clock speed, 14nm Process, 12MB L3 Cache, Dual Channel DDR4 Controller, Integrated DX12 Graphics, 1 Year Warranty



Only £374.99 inc VAT.

ORDER NOW






Intel Core i5-9600K 3.7GHz (Coffee Lake) Socket LGA1151 Processor - OEM @ £269.99 inc VAT



CM8068403874404, 3.70GHz Clock Speed, 4.6GHz Single Core Max Turbo, 9mb Cache, 95W TDP, Dual Channel DDR4 Controller, 1 Year Warranty



Only £269.99 inc VAT.

ORDER NOW





Intel Core i7-9700K 3.6GHz (Coffee Lake) Socket LGA1151 Processor - OEM @ £439.99 inc VAT



CM8068403874212, 3.60GHz Clock Speed, 4.9GHz Single Core Max Turbo, 12mb Cache, 95W TDP, Dual Channel DDR4 Controller, 1 Year Warranty



Only £439.99 inc VAT.

ORDER NOW





Intel Core i9-9900K 3.6GHz (Coffee Lake) Socket LGA1151 Processor - OEM @ £599.99 inc VAT



CM8068403873914, Hyper-Threading Technology, 3.60GHz Clock Speed, 5.0GHz Single Core Max Turbo, 16mb Cache, 95W TDP, Dual Channel DDR4 Controller, 1 Year Warranty.



Only £599.99 inc VAT.

ORDER NOW







You got 9900k right. :)

We've really managed to build up some good inventory now on 9700K and 9600K, hence getting price down, in fact our 9600K price is cheaper than most competitors sell the 8600K for. :)
 
you mentioned value 4 times. the cpu isnt value based. how is that hard to understand ? i can type properly but type like it to see if the person who cant debate a subject in a intelligent way lowers themselve to try and debate about gramma rather than the subject at hand. it does show how clever someone is. as someone with a higher intelligence would debate the topic . not try and slide round it.

It clearly ISN'T a value based CPU, that's the point lol! We're saying the same thing. It's abundantly clear that anyone who considers value an important factor in a purchasing decision won't buy it, and in a thread about PRICING, I fail to see how pointing that out is "stupid" or "trolling". But there are plenty of people who WILL buy it ignorantly, without doing their research or understanding that its price isn't value based. You must understand that, and it's why threads like this SHOULD be pointing it out. Not everyone has time to read reviews or do their research, and many will simply by a 9900K because they mistakenly think it's going to offer far better performance than something half the price... which would be quite wrong.

Debating? HA! You're not debating anything, you're just saying it's the best and that you want it. That's not a debate, nor was I 'debating' grammar, I was merely pointing out how bad yours was. Again, just a fact, not trolling, which are apparently two things you get quite confused about.
 
i'm sure dg is an intel shill he defends the product at all costs ,i'm sure intel/nvidia and others do this,well it's been proven nvidia has done it in the past
 
i'm sure dg is an intel shill he defends the product at all costs ,i'm sure intel/nvidia and others do this,well it's been proven nvidia has done it in the past

They certainly do, but it's not like he's putting forward any reasoned or considered argument, mostly becuase there isn't one. A 9900K is for a certain type of person... someone who has zero consideration for value/performance and simply wants the best (or rather fastest, as the word 'best' is open to interpretation) at any cost... and/or wants to tinker around with a 5Ghz CPU just for the hell of it, and again doesn't care how much it costs. There's also the 1080p competitive gamer who is competing with the best of the best on the world stage and therefore can justify spending £600 on a CPU for the extra FPS gains at 1080p with a 240Hz monitor. For everyone else it's pure e-peen waving/benchmark boasting or utter ignorance as to what they're actually buying.

What's even more absurd is to state that value is irrelevant in a thread that's specifically discussing pricing.

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
They certainly do, but it's not like he's putting forward any reasoned or considered argument, mostly becuase there isn't one. A 9900K is for a certain type of person... someone who has zero consideration for value/performance and simply wants the best at any cost... and/or wants to tinker around with a 5Ghz CPU just for the hell of it, and again doesn't care how much it costs. There's also the 1080p competitive gamer who is competing with the best of the best on the world stage and therefore can justify spending £600 on a CPU for the extra frame gains at 1080p with a 240Hz monitor. For everyone else it's pure e-peen waving/benchmark boasting or utter ignorance as to what they're actually buying.
i agree with you legend the people who "need" this cpu have prob already bought it good luck to them i'm sure they are pleased with it
 
i agree with you legend the people who "need" this cpu have prob already bought it good luck to them i'm sure they are pleased with it

Were selling around 70 per day, it is our best selling CPU, so there are clearly a lot of people wanting 9900K's, us having stock of course helps whereas majority of UK has no stock. :)
 
i can type properly but type like it to see if the person who cant debate a subject in a intelligent way lowers themselve to try and debate about gramma rather than the subject at hand. it does show how clever someone is. as someone with a higher intelligence would debate the topic . not try and slide round it.

Haha brilliant!:rolleyes: Almost believable too!

In the 'ignored' bin you go...

Back OT. Is the 9900K good value? No, IMHO. Also: No, if benchmarked against opposition price/performance wise. Can Intel charge what they like? Yes. What else can one say?
 
Were selling around 70 per day, it is our best selling CPU, so there are clearly a lot of people wanting 9900K's, us having stock of course helps whereas majority of UK has no stock. :)

I don't doubt that. The word 'want' pretty much drives our economy, or certain sectors of it anyway. Intel know what they're doing, and they're well aware of their brand power and the ability that it has to shift product.
 
Were selling around 70 per day, it is our best selling CPU, so there are clearly a lot of people wanting 9900K's, us having stock of course helps whereas majority of UK has no stock. :)
good business then! it is the latest after all i suppose but is the performance improvement worth the premium some people wont be bothered they just want shiny new stuff/upgrade itch i'm sure if i had lots of spare cash and was upgrading i would look at it it no doubt as like you say its the best seller so why wouldn't i we are creatures of habit but its not like the old days when an upgrade felt like an upgrade,i remember going from an amd 850mhz thunderbird then 12 months later upgrading to an athlon xp 1800+ 1.53ghz "takes off rose tinted glasses lol",i know we are hitting the limits of silicon and intel are having trouble with 10nm node ect ect and their drip drip approach performance wise at 14nm and then banging a big premium on with each new release i think as someone else said earlier we have apple's business model to thank for that... intel and nvidia have looked at apple and thought we will have a bit of that knowing they can get away with it ,i think a lot of people will just end up getting a console i ended up waiting 18months for nvidias new cards to drop thinking they would be cheaper after the cryptocurrency craze died down but nope i refuse to pay these crazy prices i'd rather do without
 
its faster than anything before for what its meant to be used for. it is a amazing cpu. as said the only thing people are moaning about are price and heat. the heat doesnt matter as its a gaming chip and in gaming its fine just like any other gaming cpu. price it could be priced better but its not that bad for a enthusiast cpu performance part. people have been paying for previous i7 high speed binned chips more .yet a stock stable fast chip is worse value somehow now thats faster :confused:

yet again you gone back to value. it isnt a value part. its a enthusiast gaming chip. where not in 100-200 budget amd gaming territory. so your comments shouldnt be related to this chip. only chips in the same price bracket.
You have no idea what amazing means. It's also "an amazing" not "a amazing."
 
eggsplained it already.

No, you haven't explained why it's amazing. You've only made that exclamation. It's certainly not amazing in a technological sense, not at all. Intel have squeezed a lot out of 14nm, credit where credit is due, but it's hardly 'state of the art' technology. Is it amazing because it does 5Ghz stable? Sure, that's nice, but "amazing", really? Playing a bit fast and loose with your adjectives there, especially as you can't really do anything with that 5Ghz that a CPU half the price can't get within 10-15% of (and even that's only at a lower resolution of 1080p). If that's truly "amazing" to you, then you're way too easily impressed. What's actually more amazing is that at 4K, a CPU half the price of the 9900k, and which is manufactured using more modern processor technology at 12nm, is actually level with it!
 
Last edited:
You're aware to some people it's peanuts money and it's not even particularly hard earned, plenty of them about :D
that's the point if your skint it's not very good value if your well off then why not buy it you can afford it its the fastest not by much but still the fastest,its just irritating trying to "debate" on here and certain people worship at the altar of intel and thinks the sun shines out of their behind its annoying ,yes they have the fastest chip but you get shafted for it
 
Back
Top Bottom