Soldato
Been eyeing these up for ages and ages now and finally bought one, was a toss up between this a duo-sonic, mustang or a jaguar but this came in at the right price.
Haha, touché.I have, that's why I bought the sleepbuds.
Haha, touché.
I was really curious about these as I love falling asleep to YouTube etc. I've discovered that you can only listen to soothing sounds through the Bose app though, which considering the price, is UTTERLY INSANE.
They sound like a really good idea, but why not let people use YouTube / music collections too? Deal breaker for me, so I'll wait for someone to copy the design at 25% of the cost.
Are there any competing products, i.e. bluetooth earbuds that are very comfortable to wear at night?
For >£200 I'd want more than 'fine'.Yeah, you can only choose from the sounds in the app and you can't use them as normal bluetooth headphones. For me, that's fine. I love falling asleep listening to the radio but the sounds in the app send me off to sleep quickly so it's not something I'm bothered by.
For >£200 I'd want more than 'fine'.
Not having at least the option to use other sources is madness. You could then use a single pair of headphones for everything, rather than when you go away on holiday or are travelling with work, someone would need to take two pairs of headphones, one for sleeping and one for music, when the ones for sleeping are of better quality than the ones for music, unless one wants to spend £400 on two pairs of earbuds.
Stupid.
Why would you need a much bigger battery life to support music streaming? It's still just bits and bytes passing via radio waves from your mobile phone. Streaming music uses battery 150% more quickly than soft sounds? Maybe that's true, but at least they'd do 5 hours, which is better than nothing and easily enough to at least initially fall asleep, then when you're just streaming the Bose sounds you'd still get the max all-night battery life.The trouble is to support music streaming you would need a much bigger battery to support streaming for 8+ hours per night and then you'd sacrifice comfort. You'd never be able to sleep on your side if these buds were any bigger. BOSE do sell wireless ear buds but their battery life is only 5 hours and that won't do a full nights sleep.
Didn't realise that, however there's a bluetooth connection right? So why not give the user the option to choose 5 hours of music vs. 16 hours of sleep sounds?The sounds (and alarm if set) are stored in the sleepbuds so there's no active bluetooth connection during the night.
Why would you need a much bigger battery life to support music streaming? It's still just bits and bytes passing via radio waves from your mobile phone. Streaming music uses battery 150% more quickly than soft sounds? Maybe that's true, but at least they'd do 5 hours, which is better than nothing and easily enough to at least initially fall asleep, then when you're just streaming the Bose sounds you'd still get the max all-night battery life.
I have a sleep headband, reasonably comfortable. £8 cheapo Chinese wireless set. My girlfriend has a much better quality, but wired, set. Game changer for me, sleeping properly for the first time in maybe 5-10 yearsAre there any competing products, i.e. bluetooth earbuds that are very comfortable to wear at night?
I have a sleep headband, reasonably comfortable. £8 cheapo Chinese wireless set. My girlfriend has a much better quality, but wired, set. Game changer for me, sleeping properly for the first time in maybe 5-10 years
https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https://www.ebay.co.uk/ulk/itm/392119800560 pretty generic, don't think OcUK sell themCan you link at all?
Good choice, Jaguar has a very high initial setup cost to get it really playing its best.Been eyeing these up for ages and ages now and finally bought one, was a toss up between this a duo-sonic, mustang or a jaguar but this came in at the right price.
Thanks! Was only £75 on Gum treeVery nice unit that.