The "number 2" already does.
Perhaps you can answer this question:
Why does Webber have a disproportionately greater number of car failures, compared with Vettel?
Has your team come up with an explanation?
The "number 2" already does.
Perhaps you can answer this question:
Why does Webber have a disproportionately greater number of car failures, compared with Vettel?
Has your team come up with an explanation?
The drivers have a large say in what upgrades they want and/or are comfortable with. They have very, very different driving styles. Vettel is exceptional and looking after a car (and its' tires), Webber is far from that.
One driver is always favoured and Vettel is the number one for good reason.This means if ever there is only one of a new upgrade at a track etc he will obviously get first choice. If something is working the team will quite obviously offer it too both drivers.
Go and watch Senna at donington 5th to 1st in one lap vimto has done just one good overtake in 2 seasons.
Perhaps you can answer this question:
Why does Webber have a disproportionately greater number of car failures, compared with Vettel?
Has your team come up with an explanation?
to all the ones saying he is not great driver till he wins with inferior car
in fairness to Vettel, he is the one that brought Toro Rosso its only victory.
PS I am not a Vettel fan, far from it in fact. but I respect that he is a great driver that has accomplished a lot
On average he qualifies lower than Seb, runs in dirty air and has to push harder to get where he should have been in the first place. That answers it I think.
Okay, but then other cars on the grid dont seem to break down so easily, as Webber's car does. Is your car more fragile?
Maldonado won in the Williams that was arguably more of a dog than the Toro Rosso and with less extreme weather conditions to help him. Just saying .
I applaud Vettel for what he's done with the Red Bull, he'd be stupid to trade it in for anything less but i'm leaning more on the side that the car/team has been the real driving force behind him. For arguments sake, MW never really showed himself to be a real contender until Red Bull got upto full steam, as much as i like the bloke i cant help but feel the car has flattered him.
Theres nothing I'd like to see more than him winning a championship in a different car just to shut us all up
All said and done the history books will be very kind Vettel!
So Sparky, whens the next hooning through the streets of MK?
Maldonado won in the Williams that was arguably more of a dog than the Toro Rosso and with less extreme weather conditions to help him. Just saying .
I applaud Vettel for what he's done with the Red Bull, he'd be stupid to trade it in for anything less but i'm leaning more on the side that the car/team has been the real driving force behind him. For arguments sake, MW never really showed himself to be a real contender until Red Bull got upto full steam, as much as i like the bloke i cant help but feel the car has flattered him.
Theres nothing I'd like to see more than him winning a championship in a different car just to shut us all up
All said and done the history books will be very kind Vettel!
So Sparky, whens the next hooning through the streets of MK?
You are a local lad, why dont you pop in for a coffee?
On average he qualifies lower than Seb, runs in dirty air and has to push harder to get where he should have been in the first place. That answers it I think.
Yet it is anyway. Even if not actively sabotaged, at the very least it is not given the same upgrades. Webber sucks, but not by that much.
Sounds like you have no idea what you're talking about. Webber's heavier than Vettel which (i've heard) equates to roughly a 1/10th per lap (per mean lap time). Which is pretty much the average time per qualy lap he's beind vettel.
http://formula1.about.com/od/drivers/a/Driver_Weights.htm
It was actually introduced in 1993, first used at Interlagos after a downpour caused chaos (how many times has that happened at Interlagos now? )If memory serves me correct, in 1993, safety cars didnt exist in F1 (I never saw any SC during those years), so drivers had to man-up and race. Rain is a great equaliser and rather than pure car performance, it becomes about driver skill.
Not sure about Barrichello...I don't actually remember him in that race.
Who ever thinks Vettels success isn't 90% down to the car has some serious blinkers on.