It will keep the place nice and toasty in the winter times.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285k 'Arrow Lake' Discussion/News ("15th gen") on LGA-1851
- Thread starter Dave2150
- Start date
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and Core Ultra 5 245K next-gen CPUs leaked alongside Z890 motherboards - VideoCardz.com
Intel Core Ultra 200K in new leaks Two SKUs now have confirmed core counts and clocks. Following the leak featuring Core Ultra 7 265KF we now have a new score using the same platform but a newer benchmark. This processor is the middle SKU within the upcoming Core Ultra 200K models, which are...
videocardz.com
MSI to reveal Z890 MAG Tomahawk motherboard for Core Ultra 200 series next week - VideoCardz.com
Another Z890 motherboard to be showcased soon MSI to unveil Tomahawk design at Gamescom. MSI teases new hardware to be unveiled next week at Gamescom. This gamer-centric event is not usually a platform for PC hardware releases, but there have been exceptions. It looks like MSI will take this...
videocardz.com
Last edited:
Intel Core Ultra 9 24-core “Arrow Lake-S” QS CPU reportedly hits 5.7 GHz clock, 5.4 GHz with all P-cores
Intel Core Ultra 9 24-core "Arrow Lake-S" QS CPU reportedly hits 5.7 GHz clock, 5.4 GHz with all P-cores - VideoCardz.com
24-core Arrow Lake-S up to 5.7 GHz Jaykihn claims that the Qualification Sample (QS) can reach 1.0 GHz higher clock than ES2. Intel has already provided Qualification Samples (QS) of its upcoming Core Ultra 200K series to partners, and some of these units have surfaced in benchmarks like...
videocardz.com
Pretty impressive clocks for a new process & on Intel's first desktop chiplet CPU. Assuming the ~100W multi-core load reduction in power is correct and assuming this thing is stable, it could be promising.
Intel Core Ultra 200 lineup leaks out, launching October 10th - VideoCardz.com
Core Ultra 200K arrives October 10, SKU lists leaks out Benchlife and Jaykihn have shared a list of upcoming Intel Core Ultra SKUs. Intel’s next-gen Core Ultra series codenamed “Arrow Lake-S” will be the desktop lineup featuring the new naming scheme. The 200-series will include 14 SKUs, but it...
videocardz.com
Soldato
ST may be bit better (+5-10%) than Zen 4/5 & MT possibly a large boost over Raptor Lake, but it's just what I read on another forum.
Even TSMC processes (it is still not 100% clear whichIntel Core Ultra 9 24-core “Arrow Lake-S” QS CPU reportedly hits 5.7 GHz clock, 5.4 GHz with all P-cores
Intel Core Ultra 9 24-core "Arrow Lake-S" QS CPU reportedly hits 5.7 GHz clock, 5.4 GHz with all P-cores - VideoCardz.com
24-core Arrow Lake-S up to 5.7 GHz Jaykihn claims that the Qualification Sample (QS) can reach 1.0 GHz higher clock than ES2. Intel has already provided Qualification Samples (QS) of its upcoming Core Ultra 200K series to partners, and some of these units have surfaced in benchmarks like...
Pretty impressive clocks for a new process & on Intel's first desktop chiplet CPU. Assuming the ~100W multi-core load reduction in power is correct and assuming this thing is stable, it could be promising.
Plus multi-chip probably has a power - and possibly a latency - cost.Still October is a lot closer than i was expecting.
Intel are certainly going all in with
Wonder what the BoM will be for this approach? For i9s/Ultra 9 BoM is seldom a big deal but for the lower SKUs it can be.
Permabanned
plenty of clocks for me.
thermals and watts is what i am after. as in lower.
a word salad here. ddr5 6400 i am planning.
ultra oc is not my priority. a nice stable new Intel platform. is.
8 cores this time.
knowing myself, I'll opt for the 265k
imagining a refresh down the line, same process? no idea.
thermals and watts is what i am after. as in lower.
a word salad here. ddr5 6400 i am planning.
ultra oc is not my priority. a nice stable new Intel platform. is.
8 cores this time.
knowing myself, I'll opt for the 265kimagining a refresh down the line, same process? no idea.
Last edited:
Socket size is where performance and power saving is being generated now.
Calling it 10nm or 5nm when it’s very mixed technology and effectively 7nm isn’t that important.
They just need to keep their objectives simple and not go running after unnecessary frequency increases.
Calling it 10nm or 5nm when it’s very mixed technology and effectively 7nm isn’t that important.
They just need to keep their objectives simple and not go running after unnecessary frequency increases.
Permabanned
deleted.
Last edited:
Associate
When this is released hopefully some reviewers will put it under a heavy 24/7 work load for a few weeks and see how stable it is.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 0
Good to see DLVR made it.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, the flagship Arrow Lake-CPU spotted on Geekbench with 5.7 GHz clock - VideoCardz.com
Core Ultra 9 285K finally on Geekbench The next-gen desktop flagship is almost here. Intel is expected to unveil its new desktop series in a few weeks. The development process is advanced, and most board partners already have access to nearly final silicon known as Qualification Samples. These...
videocardz.com
Looking very promising, if it's really 100W less all core MT load power than the 14900k!Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, the flagship Arrow Lake-CPU spotted on Geekbench with 5.7 GHz clock - VideoCardz.com
Core Ultra 9 285K finally on Geekbench The next-gen desktop flagship is almost here. Intel is expected to unveil its new desktop series in a few weeks. The development process is advanced, and most board partners already have access to nearly final silicon known as Qualification Samples. These...
Beating the 9950X in MT performance without having Hyper-Threading is pretty wild.
Last edited:
Looking very promising, if it's really 100W less all core MT load power than the 14900k!
Beating the 9950X in MT performance without having Hyper-Threading is pretty wild.
Exciting stuff, obviously take with a grain of salt but if its even close to these results i'll be happy. I'm still interested in a Bartlett-S 12 P core cpu though too for an absolute powerhouse for gaming if that ever becomes reality.
But hybrid cores are not without issues. Sure Skymont is far close to the P cores IPC which should make things easier. My work Alder Lake laptop has absolutely horrible SQL performance so much so that that 10C/12T is about FOUR times with stone complex queries compared to the old Haswell 2C/4T laptop. I even tried the latest MS SQL (which we can't currently use) but it was the same. Totally turning off E cores improved things massively there - it then "only" took 150% the time which the old Haswell over took - but then everything else was slow. For a 15W Alder Lake CPU it also throttles on all but its 90W supply while the 37W Haswell CPU was fine on a 65W supply.Looking very promising, if it's really 100W less all core MT load power than the 14900k!
Beating the 9950X in MT performance without having Hyper-Threading is pretty wild.
That is extreme and not that common but not all programs like E cores.
I'd use a workstation/server, and RDP into it from your laptop.
352 and god forbid 667 watts!? Wouldn't that melt the traces on the motherboard? It happened to me once.
Have to be honest I'm not that enthused by that performance uplift albeit Geekbench often isn't a good representation of real world results. In fact actually makes me feel better again about buying the 14700K as long as I'm not affected by the CPU failure issue as it is still not that far off the faster CPUs while considerably cheaper.
Be interesting to see how the rumoured 12P/24T Bartlett parts stack up if they get launched.
Some of us aren't yearning, Im still on X79 now, but not for much longer, I was going to go AM5 once X870 comes out, but if Arrowlake is out on the 17/10 then I will wait and see how that looks before deciding.