Technically they are MCR DIMMs as there is a small difference from MRDIMMS
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285k 'Arrow Lake' Discussion/News ("15th gen") on LGA-1851
- Thread starter Dave2150
- Start date
Caporegime
Looking at reviews of the mobile chips - the low load/idle power consumption is incredible,but under load it doesn't beat AMD in efficiency.
The main benefit seems to be the reduced core/thread count, which helps it naturally use less power on idle i.e. don't need to rely on software making the right decisions.
Caporegime
It will be interesting if AMD can further evolve their packaging,etc like Intel have done with Arrow Lake. As a proof of concept it seems to be so far not too bad.
Of all the big investments Intel made recently (or the last decade) packaging seems to have been their one success. Expensive but far far cheaper than fabs!
Lunar Lake does seem to be getting huge hype and headlines but overall I expect it is very expensive to make. Well unless Intel's own fabs are so expensive that it's cheaper to buy in TSMC N3B, which wouldn't bode well for Intel Foundry.
Intel has been operating at a loss in the last two reported quarters:
www.irishexaminer.com
I think they are taking some desperate measures, including changing what was quite a clear and promising plan for Intel 20a, out of the window.
But I think they need to remember that they are at heart, supposed to be a technology company, not just a company that appeals to the whims of investors.
Intel weighs its options to stem losses
Intel reported a net loss of $1.61 billion last quarter and announced job cuts and reduced capital spending amid declining shares.
www.irishexaminer.com
I think they are taking some desperate measures, including changing what was quite a clear and promising plan for Intel 20a, out of the window.
But I think they need to remember that they are at heart, supposed to be a technology company, not just a company that appeals to the whims of investors.
Last edited:
24th is the latest rumour of when they are on the shelves
They will probably never fail as such, there will be a buyer. Qualcomm and ARM were reportedly interested in parts of the business.
There is no way in hell the US gov will allow Intel to be bought either in parts or as a whole by any foreign firm !
Associate
"A leaked Geekbench 6 benchmark reveals results for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 non-K variant, shared by BenchLeaks on platform X, suggest that this CPU may not perform as well as AMD's Ryzen 7 9700X. Tested on an ASUS Prime Z890-P motherboard, the Core Ultra 9 285 scored 14,150 in multicore tests and 3,081 in single-core tests. In comparison, the Ryzen 7 9700X achieved higher scores of up to 19,381 in multicore and 3,624 in single-core tests. "
www.guru3d.com
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 Underperforms Against AMD Ryzen 7 9700X in Preliminary Benchmarks
A leaked Geekbench 6 benchmark reveals results for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 non-K variant, shared by BenchLeaks on platform X, suggest that this CPU may not perform as well as AMD's Ryzen 7 9700X.
www.guru3d.com
"A leaked Geekbench 6 benchmark reveals results for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 non-K variant, shared by BenchLeaks on platform X, suggest that this CPU may not perform as well as AMD's Ryzen 7 9700X. Tested on an ASUS Prime Z890-P motherboard, the Core Ultra 9 285 scored 14,150 in multicore tests and 3,081 in single-core tests. In comparison, the Ryzen 7 9700X achieved higher scores of up to 19,381 in multicore and 3,624 in single-core tests. "
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 Underperforms Against AMD Ryzen 7 9700X in Preliminary Benchmarks
A leaked Geekbench 6 benchmark reveals results for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 non-K variant, shared by BenchLeaks on platform X, suggest that this CPU may not perform as well as AMD's Ryzen 7 9700X.
The issue with those GB6 tests is RAM speed, on all the examples I have seen they are running 5600 which will lead to a lower score. The same is also true on my 14900KS running it at 5600 vs 8200+ it's a fairly sizable uplift
Intel confirms Core Ultra 200 announcement on October 10th, reviews two weeks later - VideoCardz.com
Intel Arrow Lake-S incoming The next-gen Intel desktop CPUs launching this month. The CPU maker has confirmed the release date of its new desktop CPU series, which also marks the introduction of Intel’s new desktop platform featuring the LGA-1851 socket, succeeding the 3-year-old LGA-1700...
videocardz.com
Soldato
I wonder how intel troubles will affect sales?
I'm not too bothered if intel still have issues, there is always the warranty, but even so I will probably hang on as long as I can to see..
I'm not too bothered if intel still have issues, there is always the warranty, but even so I will probably hang on as long as I can to see..
Soldato
Feel like geekbench has not been a useful benchmark for a while. For all manufacturers.
"A leaked Geekbench 6 benchmark reveals results for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 non-K variant, shared by BenchLeaks on platform X, suggest that this CPU may not perform as well as AMD's Ryzen 7 9700X. Tested on an ASUS Prime Z890-P motherboard, the Core Ultra 9 285 scored 14,150 in multicore tests and 3,081 in single-core tests. In comparison, the Ryzen 7 9700X achieved higher scores of up to 19,381 in multicore and 3,624 in single-core tests. "
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 Underperforms Against AMD Ryzen 7 9700X in Preliminary Benchmarks
A leaked Geekbench 6 benchmark reveals results for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 non-K variant, shared by BenchLeaks on platform X, suggest that this CPU may not perform as well as AMD's Ryzen 7 9700X.
What you aren't seeing in that article is the test system was hobbled with 1, 8gb stick of DDR5 5600.
You can see it here clearly in the original article at Videocardz.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 non-K CPU with 65W TDP has been spotted with 5.6 GHz boost clock - VideoCardz.com
Core Ultra 285: 24 cores in 65W The first non-K SKU gets listed on Geekbench. It has already been widely reported and mentioned in our articles that the initial lineup of Core Ultra 200 SKUs will not include any sub-125W parts. The so-called Unlocked K-series will be the first wave of Arrow...
videocardz.com
Last edited: