It's a step in the right direction - this is Intel's first attempt at chiplets for desktop. AMD have far more experience doing chiplets.
Disaggregation was their development watchword but still a misstep IMO.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
It's a step in the right direction - this is Intel's first attempt at chiplets for desktop. AMD have far more experience doing chiplets.
Prob tested on 23H2 tooDamn and that's probably cherry picking against none x3d part
Yep. DOA. 9800x3d please.
Well first of all, what is the +28% game?
And I do really welcome a return to sane(r) power usage, but with these numbers and the cost of TSMC N3B I can't see this helping Intel much
For tuners and fiddlers, ARL plus top end CADIMM might be interesting - even if probably poor value.
Nothing is DOA until you see the price, what if it's like $200 cheaper than the 9950x
Are Intel so amateur now that they have to be congratulated on something that AMD achieved 5 years ago? Go back that long and Intel were considered the best semiconductor company in the world. Nowadays their fabs are deadweight and their designs are barely faster than AMD despite a big node advantage.It's a step in the right direction - this is Intel's first attempt at chiplets for desktop. AMD have far more experience doing chiplets.
Are Intel so amateur now that they have to be congratulated on something that AMD achieved 5 years ago? Go back that long and Intel were considered the best semiconductor company in the world. Nowadays their fabs are deadweight and their designs are barely faster than AMD despite a big node advantage.
At least it worked11th Gen urrgh, what a complete turd that was. Glad I didn't go anywhere near it!!!
Ugh, really? They must have seen the awesome sales of Zen 5 and thought "me, me!".Arrow Lake seems a misstep so far to me.
EDIT: Though the focus with Arrow Lake wasn't all out performance from the start it has always been about working in new processing features for compute, AI, etc. though I've considered that is still a misstep.
At least it worked
Looks like I be saving £800 and keeping my 14900KS (now replaced) abit longer.
As long as it doesn't die on me I'm pretty happy about my 14700K purchase so far.
Are Intel so amateur now that they have to be congratulated on something that AMD achieved 5 years ago? Go back that long and Intel were considered the best semiconductor company in the world. Nowadays their fabs are deadweight and their designs are barely faster than AMD despite a big node advantage.
AMD had a great few years with Jim Keller's designs for Zen. He left plans for the next few iterations of Zen, which now appear to be fizzling out. Zen4 - Zen5 has been pretty disappointing