Associate
- Joined
- 18 Jun 2017
- Posts
- 12
Hey, folks, are there any CPU & MOBO offers/bundles available anywhere yet?
Last edited:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285k 'Arrow Lake' Discussion/News ("15th gen") on LGA-1851
- Thread starter Dave2150
- Start date
No chance lol
Associate
- Joined
- 18 Jun 2017
- Posts
- 12
I guess it's too early? I remember there were a few bundles around when the 12th Gen came out :/
Last edited:
If these rumours are true about a less efficient cpu you will see loads of bundle offers I'm sure!!!
Gigabyte preparing Z890 AORUS TACHYON ICE motherboard with CAMM2 memory support - VideoCardz.com
Gigabyte to introduce at least one CAMM2 motherboard The product manual mentions a yet-unannounced model. A product manual featuring unannounced Z890 motherboards from Gigabyte was spotted in a video from Gear Seekers. While this isn’t the full list, it includes the TACHYON ICE CAMM2. “Tachyon”...
videocardz.com
Why would anyone click on a video with that thumbnail? He looks deranged imo.
Soldato
I don't know. I have just heard that the U7 will be a few percent less powerful than the 14700K, but that's generally, for games it could be worse. And the power consumption is only better for normal desktop applications, and will be around the same as the 14700K for games. If that's the case then we aren't talking enough to get me to buy one.
But I am hoping that I am completely wrong. Like I said, I haven't been following things. I have just picked up on a few negative rumours.
Unlocked Intel Core Ultra 9 285K approaches 370W power draw during Cinebench test - VideoCardz.com
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K put through extreme testing According to new screenshots shared on social media, the Core Ultra 9 285K will consume between 360-370W when fully unlocked. This power draw can be observed during a multi-core Cinebench R23 test, with all P-Cores locked at 5.6 GHz and all...
videocardz.com
Permabanned
Temperature.
...hwinfo shot though, shows 89C max at 370W max ('unlimited' power profile)
Last edited:
Only a few days more to go. But what I was hoping for from ADL is a return sanity with regards to power consumption. I guess this 370W is max with zero limits set - and that last 200W probably gain 2% or something low like that - but it is not a good sign.Unlocked Intel Core Ultra 9 285K approaches 370W power draw during Cinebench test - VideoCardz.com
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K put through extreme testing According to new screenshots shared on social media, the Core Ultra 9 285K will consume between 360-370W when fully unlocked. This power draw can be observed during a multi-core Cinebench R23 test, with all P-Cores locked at 5.6 GHz and all...
Still, it will be fun to see what some with deep pockets can do with this with £1000 motherboards and £100s of high clocking RAM. Ring-bus clocked to hilt might yields some far more impressive results. Hopefully at settings which aren't quite suicide runs though!
If they reduced the ring bus so much, was it because of degrading RPL?
Or was it that TSMC's N3P cannot handle more there (and whatever accelerated ageing test Intel normally do may not work with TSMC's process or they are being cautious)?
Or was high ring-bus a power hog?
Certainly they would have done anything they could to not lose gaming benchmarks to RPL, so I pressume there was nothing they could do at this stage. In hindsight, maybe more L3 might have helped somewhat but while it is hard to get prices of wafers and ARL is a big mix but a few more mm2 for cache surely woudn't have broken Intel's piggy-bank. Or maybe they would have?
Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 0
Unlocked Intel Core Ultra 9 285K approaches 370W power draw during Cinebench test - VideoCardz.com
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K put through extreme testing According to new screenshots shared on social media, the Core Ultra 9 285K will consume between 360-370W when fully unlocked. This power draw can be observed during a multi-core Cinebench R23 test, with all P-Cores locked at 5.6 GHz and all...
Can def confirm the person doing this testing is a clown.
The traditional methods of tuning won’t work on arl.
Permabanned
Last edited:
It is an odd one but Intel's roadmap shows performance not being a focus for Arrow Lake and a lot talked up about AI and "features" and low power performance being the next focus :s Intel seems to have lost touch with what consumers actually want over what they think investors want to hear.
Permabanned
AMDlake
apparently.
it's just a cpu.
i played many hours of online games on a geforce 1050. i wasnt fapping over a benchmark score. with a card that literally is 20 X the price. and cpu's that for games are largely irrelevant except for e-peen.
the hype is to churn thru new merch.
Last edited:
Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 0
The way to tune arl is a lot different. You can’t just slam vcore into it and this guy does. When nda is lifted I’ll be able to share more.
In short, if want to play with a new platform with a lot of tuning options, get arl. If you only want gaming performance get a 9800x3d
Last edited:
Soldato
Yep. I am very dubious about this generation. It seems like an improvement over the 14th gen, but I didn't upgrade to 14th gen because it didn't offer enough and I am not sure that 15th gen does either.
I suppose we shall see in a few days time.
I am waiting to upgrade my current PC and just waiting for the release of these and the 9800X3D before making a choice.
Will most likely buy something towards the end of November for Black Friday but unsure what at the moment.
If your main use case is gaming, Ryzen 9800X3D or 9950X3D will be far superior to Arrow Lake.