Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Whatever. Just use high performance power plan if you'll do it. Here's the savefile, just do a capframex recording driving straight from the starting point for 50-60 sec. RT ultra preset (no path tracing), 720p/1080p+DLSS or whatever that makes it CPU bound. Maybe 2-3 runs to see the consistency if you don't mind bothering.
Thank you! The result sadly doesn't look good either indeed. Here's the comparison with my 13950HX ES + 2x24GB 6800cl34 in same scene. I hope Intel and Microsoft(?) will do something about it with BIOS, Windows or whatever else updates because this doesn't look right.
Just to clarify, this was done with high perf profile?
Or even disabling the e-cores. The 265K being almost 40% slower than an RPL laptop chip points to serious scheduling issues. I wonder if Phoronix will provide similar results. In any case, another disaster for Intel, maybe the hardware is not this bad but the software is not ready,
Thank you! The result sadly doesn't look good either indeed. Here's the comparison with my 13950HX ES + 2x24GB 6800cl34 in same scene. I hope Intel and Microsoft(?) will do something about it with BIOS, Windows or whatever else updates because this doesn't look right.
First bit of the video "we got a tip that the new chips need power measured in a different way" he then goes into detail on how they test power, I'm sensing that the "tip" is correct.
To clarify, it's not really a laptop chip, or at least it's not being run in a laptop. I'm running it in a Z790 board and it's basically a "13900K" with lower clocks (whatever you can get with manual OC, i'm limited by cooling so it's 5.3) and lower mem oc potential (8p8e instead of 8p16e because i'm limited by cooling in stress testing)
Some comments elsewhere implied that ARL and MTL are closer in design in terms of layout - but obviously not cores.
I'm sure there will be software fixes but most of this does look like a hardware issue.Bios fix incoming?
The old rumour monger strategy of "throw enough claims at the wall, until something sticks", but if later that turns to have been rubbish then pretend it need happened!And he said it was gonna beat Zen 4/5 by 10%+ or something didn't he?
It's pretty power efficient gaming, this was from playing Hunt Showdown. 36.899W average.
The question is if the efficiency comes from not being 100% utilized. Phoronix tested lunar lake and he got terrible gpu results (slower than mtl), Intel patched the issue and performance improved but power consumption increased as a result of the higher utilization.It's pretty power efficient gaming, this was from playing Hunt Showdown. 36.899W average.
Thank you, not too much difference between those anyway though =( sadly looks like we're having another "early access" type launch of a CPU.
It could be like the AMD performance increase going to 24H2 on Windows 11.
