Yep in any case gaming will be underwhelming. Hopefully Intel tries to market the Core 7 as a more budget friendly cpu and it tries to compete at least in fps/dollar. Although for that they would need a 50$ cut but it would be good for the consumer.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285k 'Arrow Lake' Discussion/News ("15th gen") on LGA-1851
- Thread starter Dave2150
- Start date
Yeah, we will see what happens to the prices once other people start comparing them and doing more testing.
What was the CPU power when running this btw? Can't access sensor data stats on your recordings. My CPU pulls about 160W on average in this scene.
I’ll get the power in a bit.
I got a much better Geekbench 6 Single core score with 26100.2152:
Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z890 AORUS ELITE WIFI7 - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z890 AORUS ELITE WIFI7 with an Intel Core Ultra 7 265K processor.
browser.geekbench.com
vs:
Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z890 AORUS ELITE WIFI7 - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z890 AORUS ELITE WIFI7 with an Intel Core Ultra 7 265K processor.
browser.geekbench.com
A lot of variance. If you look for other 265K results, you can find people getting from 3500 points in ST to 1900. It’s crazy, this launch is a disaster. Hoping Linux reviews are more consistent.
Cinebench R23 was better in Windows 26100.2152 as well.
Multi: 34853 > 35019
Single: 1812 > 2089
77W average in the 60s
Multi: 34853 > 35019
Single: 1812 > 2089
77W average in the 60s
May we live in interesting times!
I mean zen 5 x3d is at least gonna be an improvement, maybe zen6 to same socket?
Last edited:
Permabanned
yeh but is it melting the socket? 1 issue that irked me . the degradation saga. 13/14th
...and yeh that's about it.
it is more power efficient. it is running at lower clocks. performance per W?. but that bent cpu substrate pictured in an above post isnt inspiring.
all of these aspects are improvements.
myself i was expecting ...well pretty much what this is. a cooler running chip.
i also read somewhere before that it would be slower in various applications. dont worry. i dont expect anyone to talk me into it or out of it. i can do that for myself. but all the info is interesting.
...and yeh that's about it.
it is more power efficient. it is running at lower clocks. performance per W?. but that bent cpu substrate pictured in an above post isnt inspiring.
all of these aspects are improvements.
myself i was expecting ...well pretty much what this is. a cooler running chip.
i also read somewhere before that it would be slower in various applications. dont worry. i dont expect anyone to talk me into it or out of it. i can do that for myself. but all the info is interesting.
Last edited:
Just checked my local store, and new Intel chips are in stock and the ultra 7 265k is the same price as the 7800x3d, that's a tough sell man
Last edited:
Review from China, seems to support existing info - more energy efficient than 14th gen but only as fast as 13th gen in gaming, Intel 285k is slower than 14th gen and ryzen 9000 in games
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 2,532
lol Arl launch will be a good case study to see which reviewers have a sense of competency.
This one def doesn’t.
Apparently VBS adds 30ns of latency
lol Arl launch will be a good case study to see which reviewers have a sense of competency.
This one def doesn’t.
Last edited:
Permabanned
waiting on availability here. 
dust will settle . let me watch my usual toobers for entertainment.
le sigh. the non event of the degradation saga (hello just tweak your voltage settings...lol)
i wonder if the anti spruikers can dream up another saga for this one.
arctic freezer iii or another noctua (g2) ? hmm . time is on my side. coolaler . havent heard that name in a long time.
dust will settle . let me watch my usual toobers for entertainment.
le sigh. the non event of the degradation saga (hello just tweak your voltage settings...lol)
i wonder if the anti spruikers can dream up another saga for this one.
arctic freezer iii or another noctua (g2) ? hmm . time is on my side. coolaler . havent heard that name in a long time.
Last edited:
If best performance requires the latest Windows build and turning off VBS, then reviews will be all over the place IMO.
Is that build, 2153, on general release or something a reviewers has to go out of their way to find?
Windows build, correct Windows settings, most recent BIOS, this ain't be an easy CPU to review.
Do we know what Intel's reviewers guide says?
Is that build, 2153, on general release or something a reviewers has to go out of their way to find?
Windows build, correct Windows settings, most recent BIOS, this ain't be an easy CPU to review.
Do we know what Intel's reviewers guide says?
Last edited: