• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285k 'Arrow Lake' Discussion/News ("15th gen") on LGA-1851

if Arrow Lake was supposed to be the final CPU what would have that made Meteor Lake ? when this is the kind of performance you getting from Arrow Lake
 
Last edited:
Grim5 said:
People assume because arrow lake-s has been officially cancelled by Intel in their roadmap, and ultra 300 will be completely new architecture compared to arrow lake
Click to expand...

You know what they say about assumptions :D
 
Last edited:
326powah said:
Thank you. Still about the same, so i guess it is what it is for now, idk.
tnZQZg8.png
Click to expand...

This would be bad, this would be really bad, The 265K here would have to find 49% just to match the 13950HX, a 5800X3D would kick this thing in the face.....
 
surely thats upto Intel to provide guide lines how to setup the cpu for reviewers to follow ? if you get results at stock thats intels fault not reviewers imo
 
Last edited:
Robert896r1 said:
horribly loose xmp timings
Click to expand...
used in every CPU review by all reviewers ever
fact that tuning timings now helps Intel too doesn't mean you dismiss results with "stock" XMP
PS Didn't anandtech test with jedec timings? Definitely did the max officially supported
 
Last edited:
alec said:
used in every CPU review by all reviewers ever
fact that tuning timings now helps Intel too doesn't mean you dismiss results with "stock" XMP
PS Didn't anandtech test with jedec timings? Definitely did the max officially supported
Click to expand...

Not really how it works. If your auto rules fall off a cliff after a certain frequency, which is what we're seeing on higher frequency kits 8400+ you get major regression.

Also, how many reviewers will notice if they're running in G2 or G4? We'll see.

It's not a straightforward platform and the general reviewer like the general consumer is clueless about this stuff. It's totally on intel and board manufacturers to do a better job out of the box. I'm just sharing reality based on actual data infront of me.
 
uscool said:
surely thats upto Intel to provide guide lines how to setup the cpu for reviewers to follow ? if you get results at stock thats intels fault not reviewers imo
Click to expand...
IMO There should be two sets of results, the first at complete stock with JEDEC base CPU and power limits and then another with unlocked and XMP.

All these reviews seem to run different configs
 
humbug said:
This would be bad, this would be really bad, The 265K here would have to find 49% just to match the 13950HX, a 5800X3D would kick this thing in the face.....
Click to expand...

According to oc3ds data, the 285 and 265 do lose to the 5800x3d in far cry 6 as well. And the 5800x3d doesn't require watching guides and spending hours tweaking bios settings, you just plug it in and turn it on
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom