Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Mar 2013
- Posts
- 5,502
Guess I better do some looking around and make a decision on the day of release.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
0 diagrame, 0 documentatie si 0 NDA. Eu practic as fi putut publica articolul de aproximativ o saptamana (daca ma miscam mai repede). Si asta doar pentru ca nu mai exista Intel Romania.
Nu conteaza. Nu aici se produceau procesoarele. Dar macar se ocupau de sampling si semnarea de NDA-uri.
From the article, translates to:
"0 diagrams, 0 documentation and 0 NDA. I practically could have published this article almost a week ago (if I moved faster). And this is all because there's no more Intel Romania.
It doesn't matter. The processors weren't produced here. But at least they [Intel Romania] would have dealt with sampling and signing NDAs."
That gives a lot of context!
So basically, Intel Romania closed earlier this year and they're not supplying any Romanian outlets with any review samples, so the outlets just got them from unofficial sources and published the reviews early since they don't have any NDAs to follow and I presume also a sort of middle finger to Intel.
But even if the launch of this CPU is made on the knee, the processor is damn cool. It also adds everything you wanted from a 7700K. More power. A lower temperature and not the same quad core as 5 years ago.
What to do next ?! The 8700K is significantly more powerful than the 7700K and even becomes an alternative to Ryzen for those who produce content.
But I'm telling you a secret. In terms of gaming, the star is not 8700K, but 8600K overclock. 8600K is a real beast. It's cool and can run steady at 5.3 GHz using an AIO cooler.
The ryzen 1080p looks real bad here minimums in the 20's.
Think I'm finally going to upgrade my 3570k/280x to a 8600k/1070ti and going to pick up gta 5 at the same time. I been putting off a lot of the good graphic games that I can't max out.
Which will likely perform better in games, an i5 8600k or an i7 7700k? I know official performance isn't out yet, but all these leaks must have some answers.
Which will likely perform better in games, an i5 8600k or an i7 7700k? I know official performance isn't out yet, but all these leaks must have some answers.
But I would assume to get 5.3ghz you would need to spend atleast £100+ on an AIO cooler. And isn't 5.3ghz only going to be for the best golden samples? A stock speeds comparison would be interesting to see if there is one.8600k clocks to 5.3 according to leaks.
But I would assume to get 5.3ghz you would need to spend atleast £100+ on an AIO cooler. And isn't 5.3ghz only going to be for the best golden samples? A stock speeds comparison would be interesting to see if there is one.
Not long to wait until official reviews start to appear.But I would assume to get 5.3ghz you would need to spend atleast £100+ on an AIO cooler. And isn't 5.3ghz only going to be for the best golden samples? A stock speeds comparison would be interesting to see if there is one.
So do other Intel's CPUs in that image. It's the frequency of Kaby Lake and Coffee Lake that makes all the difference.The ryzen 1080p looks real bad here minimums in the 20's
It seems at odds with other benchmark charts. Gamers nexus paints a slightly different picture.So do other Intel's CPUs in that image. It's the frequency of Kaby Lake and Coffee Lake that makes all the difference.
So do other Intel's CPUs in that image. It's the frequency of Kaby Lake and Coffee Lake that makes all the difference.
Is that on the day of release, or beforehand?Not long to wait until official reviews start to appear.
RIP CPU's that only average 100 fps.