It's troll inception.
Internet Dating.....Who Has Done it?!
- Thread starter jrodga2k5
- Start date
- Status
It's troll inception.
Like **** it was. You are the one that started throwing the insults.
It's like me calling you a lanky **** and then saying, oh, I didn't mean it as an insult, I'm average height so that makes it all OK.
Hi there sigma, thank you for taking time out from calculating launch trajectories in order to weigh in on this highly anticipated clash of the titans. You raise a valid and not uninteresting point but as I have a short attention span, some of my forums posts are left unfinished and
That actually raised a smile! Reminds me of a scene from Scrubs, possibly.
Probably because you're too busy reading a book about how not be a ****.
Who is this gambitt guy? He's awesome
Reminds me of Angus Higgins, almost a cross between him and Kwerk.
It's like someone ate a thesaurus and them throwing up is your sentence.
But dude, it's Saturday night, you should be in the field, approaching them HB8 and HB9's, don't forget some negging, but gotta validate those ladies first, whilst showing value. Careful of those alpha's to, gotta disarm them, don't be beta like the rest of those AFC's.
Amirite?!
NOW you're getting professionally trollish, the writing quality is deifnitely improving.
However I advise not to trash the thread, as its gone along for a while now very smoothly, and you're going past the point of being entertaining to just being a douche with baiting people. Please don't carry it on too far as if enough people report the blatant trolling to the mods it may not end too well.
I don't think stationery shops open late on a Saturday.
Yup, the stigma is pretty much gone now.
It's the update you've all been waiting for. Part 2 of my online dating experiment. In the interest of public opinion I'll stop using the annoying PUA lingo.
I've created a 2nd profile using a photo of a good looking famous-ish bloke. He's a sportsman who's known for being good looking in his chosen sport but he's not that good at it so he won't be recognisable to anyone who doesn't follow it. He used to go out with a famous actress. I'd say he's a 9 based on looks. For comparison, I'm about a 5, maybe 5.5 when I shave.
The contents of this profile remain very similar to my own, only a few subtle changes (it's all generic non-sense anyway). I avoid listing listing things like music and movies under my interests because they are ubiquitous.
On my own profile I've messaged about 50 girls in the 7 to 10 range and have received 5 replies. I'm sending similar (semi-troll) messages to exactly the same girls using the new profile and so far I've had 3 replies from 5 messages. I need to try this with the rest of the 50 but I think I could probably just mash the keyboard with my head and send whatever appears on the screen and the results would be the same. Most of them won't look beyond your pictures.
Normal, nice messages have the same effect. For example, I sent this innocuous message to a girl who listed French cinema as one of her interests (an interest which I genuinely share):
J'adore French films. I'm sure you've seen the classic, "Le Diner de Cons" but what about "La tourneuse de pages"? District 13 is good if you like a little violence. Anything you can recommend?
Nothing. Completely ignored and all I did was ask for a film recommendation. Later on I sent a very similar message using the good-looking guy account and she replied instantly with 2 of her favourite French films and proceeded to quiz me about some of my interests. Nice girl.
I realise this is the metaphorical equivalent of testing if water is wet but nevertheless, I find it amusing.
I've created a 2nd profile using a photo of a good looking famous-ish bloke. He's a sportsman who's known for being good looking in his chosen sport but he's not that good at it so he won't be recognisable to anyone who doesn't follow it. He used to go out with a famous actress. I'd say he's a 9 based on looks. For comparison, I'm about a 5, maybe 5.5 when I shave.
The contents of this profile remain very similar to my own, only a few subtle changes (it's all generic non-sense anyway). I avoid listing listing things like music and movies under my interests because they are ubiquitous.
On my own profile I've messaged about 50 girls in the 7 to 10 range and have received 5 replies. I'm sending similar (semi-troll) messages to exactly the same girls using the new profile and so far I've had 3 replies from 5 messages. I need to try this with the rest of the 50 but I think I could probably just mash the keyboard with my head and send whatever appears on the screen and the results would be the same. Most of them won't look beyond your pictures.
Normal, nice messages have the same effect. For example, I sent this innocuous message to a girl who listed French cinema as one of her interests (an interest which I genuinely share):
J'adore French films. I'm sure you've seen the classic, "Le Diner de Cons" but what about "La tourneuse de pages"? District 13 is good if you like a little violence. Anything you can recommend?
Nothing. Completely ignored and all I did was ask for a film recommendation. Later on I sent a very similar message using the good-looking guy account and she replied instantly with 2 of her favourite French films and proceeded to quiz me about some of my interests. Nice girl.
I realise this is the metaphorical equivalent of testing if water is wet but nevertheless, I find it amusing.
So in conclusion...
Ground-breaking stuff right there.
Sorry for de-railing the topic.
Can't see myself using on-line dating for quite a while, if at all. Watching programs like 'Take Me Out' is a great chance to see how fast a woman's opinion of a guy can change. The other week some chap came on and everyone was loving him, no lights were turned off, then as his video started and he stated he was a postman, the lights just started going off rapidly. Thus money seemed like the main factor there. It's fair enough, everyone can have expectations of the perfect partner, as long as it's not too unrealistic.
So, if you're not getting replies from a type of girl you would like to date, rather than continuously sending out messages in the hope one of them likes what they see, find out what you can work on in your own life, career, exciting hobbies, improving your look, etc. Even the action of working towards improving something is attractive.
Or even:
Like I said, I used almost identical profiles so their responses were based on pictures alone. For the most part, they don't care about your exciting hobbies or your career (well, as long as you're not a postman). You could list jet pack snowboarding as a hobby but it's irrelevant if you're not good looking enough so let's not pretend otherwise. Woman are fickle creatures just like men, only they generally won't admit to it.
This is vastly different in real life where body language and chemistry can completely change the dynamic of a conversation. By approaching them you force them to interract with you, thus giving you a better opportunity to impress her. When a woman is receiving 50 messages a day, she will only have time to respond and start conversations with her favourite 2 or 3 so you won't even get a look in.
Like I said, I used almost identical profiles so their responses were based on pictures alone. For the most part, they don't care about your exciting hobbies or your career (well, as long as you're not a postman). You could list jet pack snowboarding as a hobby but it's irrelevant if you're not good looking enough so let's not pretend otherwise. Woman are fickle creatures just like men, only they generally won't admit to it.
This is vastly different in real life where body language and chemistry can completely change the dynamic of a conversation. By approaching them you force them to interract with you, thus giving you a better opportunity to impress her. When a woman is receiving 50 messages a day, she will only have time to respond and start conversations with her favourite 2 or 3 so you won't even get a look in.
Last edited:
So the sum a total of your research is that a girl is more likely to reply to a good looking guy that she fancies? I think we could have all saved you a bit of time and effort there... you are raising things that have already been discussed about 10x in the thread. Yawn.
Last edited:
Hi again Rich Dog, thank you for your concern for my time and effort but as I said earlier: "I realise this is the metaphorical equivalent of testing if water is wet but nevertheless, I find it amusing".
As per your request, here is my latest update:
10/14/2012 2:38:52 PM
Hey how are u? How has your weekend been? Xxx
10/14/2012 3:26:42 PM
Hi there, thanks for the message but I don't think we'd get along. You're looking for someone trustworthy and I am well, not. Just ask my probation officer. Also, I don't have time to treat anyone like a princess.
Regards, Tom
I'll let you know what she comes back with, if anything.
I guess I just have to wonder what your aims are with your mails to them, and what motivates you. I'm guessing a strong undercurrent of bitterness at repeated failure and rejection, which drove you to try and learn to be a PUA, and then i'm thinking you clearly didn't have much luck with the PUA stuff considering you are still trolling women and creating fake profiles. As you said, dignity is clearly not one of your most valuable assets.
- Status