Seeing as the mission statement of SHADER is and always has been to "disrupt and degrade ISIL" (not defeat) I don't see how anyone would ever had thought otherwise... Unless they're ignorant.
ISIL, ISIS, Daesh discussion thread.
- Thread starter RoboCod
- Start date
Back at you. Here is a clue: RT is as much evidence as the BBC is. This is all you have access to, you know little to nothing of the actual facts.
It's also quite fantastic that posters here are up in arms that active MILITARY MEMBERS were killed in a MILITARY ENVIRONMENT by accident when a convoy of innocent aid workers have been killed by what is most probably a Russia air asset.
It beggars belief but I guess the rhetoric must always be peddled mustn't it?
It beggars belief but I guess the rhetoric must always be peddled mustn't it?
Citation needed, because well, you're entitled to make up you own opinion but not your own facts.
You do understand that just because a few posters post the same thing (that they all sourced from RT) and then use RT further as confirmation that the RT report makes the RT report fact, it actually doesn't, right? That would be like saying the Bible must be fact.
Again, facts vs opinion.
Also yes, Russia bomb anything and everything - yes they do, they do not differentiate between militant groups such as ISIL and rebel factions. They bomb either, so long as it supports dictator Assads cause. So yes, anything and everything... Which leads to the suggestion that they struck the convoy (probably by accident) not so inconceivable.
Citation needed. Another clue: I'd try use something other than RT for citation for once.
ISIL. The group we're fighting.
I rest my case
Pathetic.
The amusing thing is, he believes his opinion actually matters and has some bearing and implication on world affairs.
Lol, there's people's perception and then there is RaohNS and his posts. Delusions of grandeur certainly come to my mind. On the contrary though, less am I 'wound up' but more bemused and bewildered by the estranged viewpoint and outright blind fanboyism of Russia, Putin and anything team Ruski. The smug demeanour of an 'I-told-you-so' poster when they cite a news agency with a strong political agenda as if it is gospel along with a persistent knee jerk scramble to defame the west at any opportunity is all pretty bizarre behaviour. He makes a consistent and relentless effort to achieve the latter daily on these forums!
So no, I wouldn't say RaohNS winds me up but in fact it intrigues me just how unintriguing and weird that behaviour is... It's like discussing matters with someone who is completely of blind faith and able to consider any other stance. It's actually quite dull! As for yourself I agree, as you suggest, you come across as wanting to shoot the breeze about certain topics i.e. you don't seem like a lunatic.
Last edited:
Hellfire strikes don't even leave craters when they hit vehicles. They're pretty low yield weapons.
About as much credibility as Trump sitting there on CNN and accusing Assad of doing it . Worthless
did trump accuse assad of bombing his own men?
No I was figuratively speaking.
Where is the outrage in this thread that the Syrian government continue to relentlessly and indiscriminately bombard Aleppo killing innocents? Given the outcry about the Syrian military individuals being killed in this military environment I would have thought we'd all be foaming at the mouth over this. Surprising indeed!
Soooo... no outrage then?
So your issue is that the media isn't reporting fairly, not that the Syrian regime and Russians are indiscriminately laying the city to waste?
Wow.
Wow.
So you're also content that Assad is bombarding innocent civilians?
I guess the Americans shouldn't have intervened in WWII either then?
Truly shocking attitudes on this forum.
I know, but besides the point, they apparently should have just stayed in their own country and not interfered.
Yet still (!) you seem absolutely content that the Syrian regime and Russia are laying the city to waste.
Off topic.
I wonder what the views in here would be if the west suddenly decided to flatten raqqah to kill a few ISIL. Lord, could you imagine the circle jerk the likes or you, RaohNS and Co would have, posting links about the war mongering, baby killing West targeting innocent civilians... I mean they admitted to accidentally killing just a few Syrian Army and you were all chomping at that.
It's quite hilarious.
Hahahhahahahhahahaha!
Sorry but actual lols here! you're bloody brilliant humour you
do you leave the house much? I'd love to have you over for entertainment.(serious note : agenda seekers here still up in arms over military dying in a military environment and not at all over innocent civilians in Aleppo. What utterly disgusting forum members we have).
Last edited:
