Not necessarily. Low yield weapons don't necessarily result in mangled wrecks. Do you actually have any weaponeering knowledge?ISIL, ISIS, Daesh discussion thread.
- Thread starter RoboCod
- Start date
Not necessarily. Low yield weapons don't necessarily result in mangled wrecks. Do you actually have any weaponeering knowledge?
Funny, I have the same laugh at you"a few"... What's that? Your drink driving excuse to a copper? Lulz.
Well here is where you revert to troll mode... Or ignorance mode (likely)... it was during a ceasefire. Remind us who you support again Robo? The US hospital bombers of course.
.
You're taking the few comment too literally on purpose, it just proves you have a weak argument. Of course, compared to the thousands of civilians in Aleppo being given killed by the Russian backed regime then yes relatively it's just a few soldiers.... And seeing as we're bleating about a ceasefire, well you better be bleating about that convoy the Syrians/Russians struck too...
From looking at pictures? Christ. Do you base your knowledge on Rambo movies?
The correct answer was "robocod, I have no weaponeering knowledge whatsoever, so I will cease to make statements as if I did have any because in doing so I'm just making myself look silly".
....
In RaohNS world: western propaganda = bad/incorrect. ISIL/syrian/Russian/anything not Western propaganda = good/correct.
You're forgetting the chain of events my dear shill, surprising because it wasn't too long ago. There was an uprising, a demand for democratic change. The regime have denied the people that change. Assad has denied them and instead shells and bombards innocents in major cities (a point I repeat over and you shills just seem to keep ignoring).... So yes, govt held areas bad! Assad needs to stand down and give the country what it wants.
Im glad you can make the admission that you have no expertise in that field. Further, with the above comment you demonstrate that you don't realise you need expertise in that field to know what you're taking about. It's fine to admit you don't know. It's the harping on like you do that makes it all quite borseome.
Bless your conspiracy theory little head. However, despite what you believe on the lead up, the chain of events and whatever nutty theories you hold, the truth remains that millions of people protested for change. Assad has no right to deny that change and he certainly has no right to be executing his own people, those that oppose him. I think you're disgusting if you disagree and are content that leaders kill their own who disagree with them.
You like this quote don't you? I suggest you go outside. I suggest you go to the gym. I suggest lifting things and putting things down might suit your thought process better than trying to decipher middle east mess.
Last edited:
You don't know that to be true.
RT lol... So impartial and so not pushing anti- western agenda. Well done. Keep letting them think for you.
Does the Hypocrisy not astound you?
Nah, maybe just RaohNS.
Slow everything.
And you denying evidence that Assad is bombing Aleppo? Come on RaohNS, there is having blind faith in the red team, but then there is just plain denial.
Time to edify yourself.
Last edited:
"True knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing"
AQ commander? I thought it was ISIL a minute a go? Must be true though, he said so.
Meanwhile, more pertinent...
guardian link
Inb4 it's western propaganda, so isn't true.
Inb4 doctors are not ISIL commanders, so isn't true.
Inb4 victims not Syrian army so don't care.
Meanwhile, more pertinent...
guardian link
Inb4 it's western propaganda, so isn't true.
Inb4 doctors are not ISIL commanders, so isn't true.
Inb4 victims not Syrian army so don't care.
Oh look, EVIDENCE the AQ/ISIL/NUSRA commander informant is fake... Who would have thought it?
https://mobile.twitter.com/tobiaschneider/status/780771393453588484?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
https://mobile.twitter.com/tobiaschneider/status/780771393453588484?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
I've been hounding HIM for evidence? I think you've got posts mixed up mate.
Also, regardless of the medium on which the information is hosted (be it reddit, twitter, or a TS military system) if the source/analysis is applicable then it is applicable. It would be folly to dismiss something just because it is based on a medium that you have presumptions about. That is the shills issue and the BBC. Take all the info and consider it all critically.
Last edited:
Like all RT (or any other) news report then.
Alas, I actually post something to back up and you typically dismiss it straight away. So why should I bother RaohNS? If it doesn't play to your sound track then it doesn't matter.
Once again, resident shill ignores and fails to comment about the regime indiscriminately slaying its own civilians and instead chooses to try and re-educate me about ISIL. Deary me.
Last edited:
Ah bless.
I'd appreciate a quote so cry babies can cry.
Are we 12 yrs old now?
No you are.
So STILL no comment about Assad bombing civilians in Aleppo.
With Sherqat under way it's a matter of time before Mosul is liberated of ISIL control.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/...operation-isil-held-town-160920154300904.html
Shame it looks a little late before the end of Obama's term in office
Hillary/Trump will stand up and take the credit no doubt.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/...operation-isil-held-town-160920154300904.html
Shame it looks a little late before the end of Obama's term in office
Hillary/Trump will stand up and take the credit no doubt.
Galloway? You give him too much credit!
Which is also pretty much the same as quoting a news article that was written by a journalist. So other than illegally publishing protectively marked material what do you suggest?
And yes it is analysis. He took data, analysed it and presented a sound argument. That's not bad really. It's better than "random guy who claims to be ISIL commander said something so it must be true!"
Last edited: