Israel-Hamas war - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
No mate it hasn’t because most people aren’t psychotic enough to want to kill the million plus civilians in Gaza.

Annihilate hamas as that is what is needed, every last one of the vile ******* things.

We have to keep in mind however, that there are over 2 million people in Gaza, not all of these people are Hamas. All of Palestine is not an extremist Islamist group like some users have stupidly been saying.
Oh I mean the entire area not just Gaza.

This is GD where anything goes (other than swearing or personal attacks). It really should be moved to Speakers Corner.
 
You cannot respond to an atrocity in which innocent civilians were murdered by committing another atrocity that murders more innocent civilians.

It seems ...failures. It will only stoke the fires of further militancy. Israel would be better to focus on correcting its defensive failures than to start bombing, which will kill more innocent civilians, and will achieve nothing.
@radderfire Uhm, actually you can. And then, after a few years, if you are dealing with sane individuals, you can buy their cars, drink their beer, make comedy skits about "Don't mention the War", form an economic union with them or a number of other interesting common items.

What I think you are trying to say is that, in this instance, dealing with Hamas/Hezbollah/PIJ etc and possibly even the Palestinians in general may achieve nothing.

In that instance, the options are very limited. If offers for peace settlement have been rejected 5 times you give up and go about your business.
 
Last edited:
Israel should have more troops on the ground around the Gaza strip, as clearly they have been shown to be vulnerable to invasion, and they did not have enough people on the ground to defend themselves.

Air strikes on urban areas is just killing innocent Palestians. The majority of people in Palestine will be normal innocent people, not militants. Put yourself in their shoes. Israel cannot respond to an atrocity by committing another. If you are killing innocent people, it's an atrocity. You cannot bomb an urban area without killing innocent people.

Israel should have more troops on the ground around the Gaza strip, as clearly they have been shown to be vulnerable to invasion, and they did not have enough people on the ground to defend themselves.
Clearly what the Israelis need to do here is take a 1km chunk of land from the border of Gaza and turn it into a DMZ. Intruders on this strip of land die.

Air strikes on urban areas is just killing innocent Palestians. The majority of people in Palestine will be normal innocent people, not militants. Put yourself in their shoes. Israel cannot respond to an atrocity by committing another. If you are killing innocent people, it's an atrocity. You cannot bomb an urban area without killing innocent people.

You are correct... Bombing an urban area where an enemy has firmly entrenched themselves alongside, above and beneath the civilian population whom they choose to use as human shields results in civilian casualties. In this instance, their blood is firmly on the hands of Hamas and not Israel.
 
just leaving this here. This was written by Katharine Fortin (https://www.uu.nl/staff/KMAFortin), associate professor of international law at Utrecht University in a paper about Russia's targetting of things like power, water and medical (hospitals) infrastructure. I'll stab a guess that everyone is outraged at Russia's blowing up of such infrastrcuture in Ukraine even though they claim (albiet a bull **** claim) it's a military objective, which you can in some cases justify targeting power grids and other civillian strcutures for military gain. I'll also bet on the same people saying it's completely legit for Israel to do this though regardless of the net loss to life at the end.
@wildman Except in that instance, Russia is the aggressor. Here, Israel is responding to a massive, deplorable terror attack on its sovereign soil.
 
Last edited:
Could be. I am not completely sure why they are saying it will be a long war either. Gaza is small, and the Israelis have a huge military advantage. It could take longer if other countries join in, but hopefully that won't happen.
It will be long for a number of reasons... The primary ones being they will be trying to limit civilian casualties otherwise they would just reinact Dresden and secondly they will be making certain to destroy the entire underground city of tunnels before leaving.
 
I completely understand the difference. Hence why Israel and their plans to level Gaza are not proportionate. I believe Hamas should be destroyed, I don’t believe all of Gaza needs to be destroyed to achieve that goal.
Hence @Twinz is correct in that you don't understand the difference between the two. Israel's goals are threefold:
1. Destroy Hamas;
2. Destroy the military complex underground and hidden in amongst the civilian infrastructure; and
3. Minimise civilian casualties but not at the expense of Israeli casualties.
 
Yes. Somebody has to be big and say we've been attacked but we will not respond offensively, only defensively. You cannot continue the cycle, it has to stop at some point. If you take a step down the path of offensive action, it will only lead to further escalation and more attacks on you. The situation is impossible to solve offensively without very large civilian casualties, so this route is best avoided.
@radderfire, Are you a grandchild of Neville Chamberlain perhaps? You could maybe channel his spirit and ask him how his " Jaw, Jaw, Jaw not War, War, War" policy worked out.
 
As has been pointed out, terrorists only understand violence in kind. They have no interest in negotiation even from their 'weak' position.
 
I wonder, what’s the point of people moving to a secure area if these guy might be infiltrated? Almost like everyone moves to the secure area and there is nobody around the remaining grounds. What makes people think that even if there was a secure place that wouldn’t prevent the bad ones infiltrate? This is a difficult one because they hide behind the innocents there, which I want to believe there are.
@IGBT Wait? Are you seriously suggesting that Hamas are hiding amongst the civilian population and using them as human shields?

I am certain I have been reading that civilian casualties are a direct result of Israeli aggression and their lack of regard for the rules of war.

Do you have a source for this because a number of people are suggesting otherwise?
 
It's quite difficult to oppose men with machine guns, sadly.
You think? So they cannot resist Hamas by informing on them to Mossad or or another agency? A phonecall? An email? Dead drop? Carrier pigeon? One of literally a thousand ways.

Civilians probably saw/heard something and kept silent choosing not to oppose.
 
You think? So they cannot resist Hamas by informing on them to Mossad or or another agency? A phonecall? An email? Dead drop? Carrier pigeon? One of literally a thousand ways.

Civilians probably saw/heard something and kept silent choosing not to oppose.

Even if they are opposed to Hamas and/or the acts they carry out that doesn't mean they would have anything to do with Israel/Mossad who potentially are still/also the enemy to them. They might have concerns for their own safety - phone calls might be intercepted, etc.

What you are suggesting might sound reasonable and logical from the comfort, safety and security of the West but it really doesn't make any sense in the context of somewhere like Palestine whatsoever.
 
Looks like Egypt may open a corridor to let civilians in from Gaza

It's what the White House is pushing for, hopefully Egypt agrees to it

Unfortunately some of Hamas will probably use that to escape into Egypt as well then Egypt will have to deal with the militants
 
Last edited:
I see yet again UK is acting like Isreal are just victims, and any retaliation is justified.

Labour even worse than the government with Reeve responding we are fully committed to Isreal, and refusing to acknowledge whats going on. She even claimed we would act in same way, yet we didnt when the IRA bombed us.

Social media at least shows there is recognition of the victims of Isreal attacks though.
 
Last edited:
Looks like Egypt may open a corridor to let civilians in from Gaza

It's what the White House is pushing for, hopefully Egypt agrees to it

Unfortunately some of Hamas will probably use that to escape into Egypt as well then Egypt will have to deal with the militants

I don't get the impression either Israel or Egypt are that gone on the idea.
 
I love these threads, so many people with no combat experience saying how a military should carry out this task.

My favourite take so far has been sending troops into a urban environment, with a mostly hostile population hiding combatants not wearing uniform. I can't think of a better way to get troops killed that walking slowly towards a machine gun brandishing a stick.

Israel has the range advantage in air, artillery and recon. They'll just sit back and level targets until there's no left. Hamas is out gunned and out matched in every quarter, if they don't surrender they are deadmen at the whims of the Israelis.
Lol

Talks about experience
Hamas Tunnel system enters the chat and ends yours.
 
I mean i get what you're saying but should people not ever comment on something they havent done. I havent played professional football either, should i not comment on that?

Instead of being offended, reply, state your experience and educate.
Ok.

15 years in the army, serving in the royal artillery as a forward observer for 12 of those years. Then as a trainer at sennybridge for an additional 3.

Served in
* northern Ireland
*Kosovo
*Afghanistan two tours
* Iraq 1tour.

And I can tell you city fighting is a level of hell I would wish no one to repeat
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom