Israel-Hamas war - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hence @Twinz is correct in that you don't understand the difference between the two. Israel's goals are threefold:
1. Destroy Hamas;
2. Destroy the military complex underground and hidden in amongst the civilian infrastructure; and
3. Minimise civilian casualties but not at the expense of Israeli casualties.

Point 3 above is what I am saying should be key to Israel’s strategy. Some on this thread and more importantly key Israeli personnel were declaring they would leave no building standing. So I was not talking about what they are doing now, but what some wanted them to do purely as revenge. Some were also justifying it (on this thread) with utter nonsense about all Palestinians being Hamas and thus legitimate targets.
 
And I can tell you city fighting is a level of hell I would wish no one to repeat

With all due respect, I don’t really understand how the goal of removing Hamas completely, is possible with air and artillery alone.

Gaza is going to need to be cleaned out, street to street, the whole area needs to be totally wiped clean, then Israel take it for themselves*

I just don’t see how any final or lasting goal can be achieved, without the complete takeover of Gaza and for me that would require 300-400k troops on the ground.

*Whether Israel should take over Gaza or not, from the perspective of “right or wrong” is beyond me, and I think that the whole situation has now transcended any notion of right or wrong, it just needs to be done.
 
Do you think the strategy might be to make Gaza uninhabitable, push the population into neighbouring countries, making everyone leave and then consuming Gaza into Israel? Or is that impossible?
 
With all due respect, I don’t really understand how the goal of removing Hamas completely, is possible with air and artillery alone.

Gaza is going to need to be cleaned out, street to street, the whole area needs to be totally wiped clean, then Israel take it for themselves*

I just don’t see how any final or lasting goal can be achieved, without the complete takeover of Gaza and for me that would require 300-400k troops on the ground.

*Whether Israel should take over Gaza or not, from the perspective of “right or wrong” is beyond me, and I think that the whole situation has now transcended any notion of right or wrong, it just needs to be done.
I think this is what they will do. They know they will most likely lose potentially hundreds/thousands of soldiers, and the same will happen to the other side.
 
Do you think the strategy might be to make Gaza uninhabitable, push the population into neighbouring countries, making everyone leave and then consuming Gaza into Israel? Or is that impossible?
Neighbouring countries have to want to let them in though. Apparently the US want Eqypt to open a humanitarian corridor, not sure they will be too keen on the idea, unless it was just for women and children maybe.
 
Weird video tbh. What identifies that man as Hamas and not an emotional Palestinian civilian?

Nothing, that's the problem the IDF face, as usual the extremist elements don't identify for the most part.

Civilians are martyrs for thier cause, so they don't care who dies as long as they serve a purpose in death.
 
Do you think the strategy might be to make Gaza uninhabitable, push the population into neighbouring countries, making everyone leave and then consuming Gaza into Israel? Or is that impossible?

I think Egypt and some of the other Arab countries will need to take the Gazan refugees and I think they probably will at some point, once Israel “gets going”

And I think it’s not only possible that Israel can consume Gaza - I think it has to happen now.

And I think Israel needs to strike whilst the iron is hot, the US currently has their back and will do for a while, they have a fair reason to do it, and it would be a lasting solution to a very big problem.

I say this as no supporter of Israel whatsoever, but more from a perspective of realism and practicality, there is no hope for Gaza, whatsoever.
 
I think Egypt and some of the other Arab countries will need to take the Gazan refugees and I think they probably will at some point, once Israel “gets going”

And I think it’s not only possible that Israel can consume Gaza - I think it has to happen now.

And I think Israel needs to strike whilst the iron is hot, the US currently has their back and will do for a while, they have a fair reason to do it, and it would be a lasting solution to a very big problem.

I say this as no supporter of Israel whatsoever, but more from a perspective of realism and practicality, there is no hope for Gaza, whatsoever.
So the only solution is ethnic cleansing?
 
With all due respect, I don’t really understand how the goal of removing Hamas completely, is possible with air and artillery alone.

Gaza is going to need to be cleaned out, street to street, the whole area needs to be totally wiped clean, then Israel take it for themselves*

I just don’t see how any final or lasting goal can be achieved, without the complete takeover of Gaza and for me that would require 300-400k troops on the ground.

*Whether Israel should take over Gaza or not, from the perspective of “right or wrong” is beyond me, and I think that the whole situation has now transcended any notion of right or wrong, it just needs to be done.
War has changed a lot since I was in.

But with the access to drones and 24/7 recon capabilities. It's a game of wackamole.
Identify potential launch sites. There's a limited number of tunnel exits and a number would be unusable due damage from previous strikes.
Look out for guys carrying 10-20ft missiles and their steel carriers. Have are battery of light artillery or a dedicated aircraft on standby. On detection of launch or set up drop hell on them.
Kill enough leaders and the followers will take over and do something stupid, it's what we did in Basrah and the militants tried to do the ride of the rhorim in pickups against bunkered down challenger 2s and warriors. Across a killing zone


I expect once the known hamas locations are targeted they will change tactics. I suspect they have already hacked the mobile phone towers and ase energy becomes tighter only hamas will be allowed to use things like phones.

I think they'll won't take the city but create a DMZ around it filled with deep trenches to prevent tunnels and land mines.
 
I see yet again UK is acting like Isreal are just victims, and any retaliation is justified.

Labour even worse than the government with Reeve responding we are fully committed to Isreal, and refusing to acknowledge whats going on. She even claimed we would act in same way, yet we didnt when the IRA bombed us.

Social media at least shows there is recognition of the victims of Isreal attacks though.

Let's start with Israel not Isreal. It hurts my eyes. Comparison with the IRA is not valid as most events were aimed at killing the security services not the general public although there were exceptions Enniskillen etc. Most were pre warned by coded message. None were by suicide .

Don't get me wrong, the IRA were awful, murdering ***** as we're the UDA and the other paramilitary organisations on all sides. They weren't touched by god though nominally religious mainly political.

HAMAS are, llke ISIS they believe that if you are not the same religion you can be burnt, thrown of buildings, shot beheaded etc. There is no choice in the matter.

So HAMAS must be destroyed like ISIS or hugely depleted. An objective is the minimalisation of civilian casualties but there will be quite a few. It is that type of warfare. One day when we don't allow religion to burn our minds we may be able to stop doing this.
 
Last edited:
Gaza has to be up there with the worst urban environments for combat - high density of buildings and civilians, many high-rise buildings, lots of intersections, an opponent who has had plenty of time to dig in and has probably mined many streets, an opponent who'll use almost any tactics - suicide bombers are especially lethal in those kind of enclosed environments. Also an opponent used to fighting as small semi-autonomous cells/groups so not as easily defeated by taking out leadership as could be the case.

But even with saturation shelling it'll take a lot of time to starve them out.
 
Last edited:
War has changed a lot since I was in.

But with the access to drones and 24/7 recon capabilities. It's a game of wackamole.
Identify potential launch sites. There's a limited number of tunnel exits and a number would be unusable due damage from previous strikes.
Look out for guys carrying 10-20ft missiles and their steel carriers. Have are battery of light artillery or a dedicated aircraft on standby. On detection of launch or set up drop hell on them.
Kill enough leaders and the followers will take over and do something stupid, it's what we did in Basrah and the militants tried to do the ride of the rhorim in pickups against bunkered down challenger 2s and warriors. Across a killing zone


I expect once the known hamas locations are targeted they will change tactics. I suspect they have already hacked the mobile phone towers and ase energy becomes tighter only hamas will be allowed to use things like phones.

I think they'll won't take the city but create a DMZ around it filled with deep trenches to prevent tunnels and land mines.
Israels mobilised 360000 soldiers, I doubt they will just sit at the border tbh...
 
It will be long for a number of reasons... The primary ones being they will be trying to limit civilian casualties otherwise they would just reinact Dresden and secondly they will be making certain to destroy the entire underground city of tunnels before leaving.

Do you really think they will try to limit civilian casualties? They don't have much of a record for doing that.

Also, I wonder if they will ever leave. They might just throw the remaining Palestinians out.
 
So the only solution is ethnic cleansing?

Basically, harshly, unfairly - it probably is the only solution.

There’s no solution in principle, that’s possible, that makes sense where Gaza continues to exist.

The US should help with the humanitarian effort, they have the resources to help mediate and facilitate it, in terms of redistributing the Gazans to other Arab countries.
 
Saw this on the BBC:

'Hamas started this war. We’ll finish it': Israel senior adviser​

Peter Gillibrand
BBC Newsnight
Benjamin Netanyahu’s senior adviser has told BBC Newsnight that Israel must "respond with force" to Hamas.
Speaking from Jerusalem, Mark Regev, who also used to be the Israeli Ambassador to the UK, said the country is shocked and they want a more stable reality in the region.
“Hamas started this war. We’ll finish it and we’ll finish it on our terms,” he told BBC Newsnight’s Diplomatic Editor, Mark Urban.
“I’d ask other people, citizens of Britain, of any other country, what would you do if 1,000 of your people were killed on one day?" he said.
"The Prime Minister has compared this to the September 11 attacks in the US. But if you look at the size of the Israeli population and compare it to the Americans… it was worse than September 11th."
“If Israel doesn’t respond with force, I’m afraid the lesson will be learnt across this region - you can hit Israel with impunity - that’s not acceptable.”

What a weird comment :confused:
 
Basically, harshly, unfairly - it probably is the only solution.

There’s no solution in principle, that’s possible, that makes sense where Gaza continues to exist.

The US should help with the humanitarian effort, they have the resources to help mediate and facilitate it, in terms of redistributing the Gazans to other Arab countries.
Basically gifting Hamas or any other group with a distinct displeasure for Jewish people what it wants on a silver platter if this is the outcome. Any sympathy I have for Israel would evaporate permanently.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom