On another note...
I would love to know the answer to this question....
The "out of 10" result of the forum polls of each race this season... and the position Vettel and Hamilton have finished in those respect races....
Haas were warned that if they didn't sort it they could face protests.
They didn't, they did, and they were excluded.
Even with the summer shutdown they had 3 weeks. Didn't need a complete redesign, they could have modified their existing floors. May not have been as quick, but would have been legal.
Front edge of the tea-tray didn't meet the 5cm radius rule. Not sure by how much.
Apparently they tested it in Belgium and it proved inconclusive whether it helped or not. Due to this they were only running the new floor on one car as an A/B test, which is why Magnussen wasn't disqualified too.
So if Leclerc is joining Ferrari for sure and with Seb clearly unhappy with Raikkonens driving and results this weekend, could we see the rails fall off in a different manner at Ferrari for the rest of the season with Raikkonen trying to prove himself in the last races of his career potentially?
Yep, but there was nothing stopping them using an older, legal, floor, which certainly won't have helped their case.Their deposition asserts that they didn't bring it to Monza due to supply issues.
It's an opinion, hardly a fact. Just base the rating on how good a race was. Montreal 2012 was 10/10, but there was no reason why that couldn't take place in 2018, in theory.No it equals or betters any race i have seen this year.
The ONLY mark for comparison, are other races in the same season.
You cannot in any way compare to previous seasons races, as far too many variables change from season to season.
It is the same as trying to call a best car or best driver ever in history, it is impossible. Certain cars and certain drivers were exceptional compared to their counterparts at the time, but it is impossible to compare them to previous or later cars and drivers.
Their deposition asserts that they didn't bring it to Monza due to supply issues.
Yep, but there was nothing stopping them using an older, legal, floor, which certainly won't have helped their case.
The new floor was tested in Belgium, as per this article
They had been told they had to fix it before Monza and they didn't.Their deposition asserts that they didn't bring it to Monza due to supply issues.
That could well be the case. I assumed the new floor was the illegal one. In either case, they must at some point this season have had a legal floor they can re-use so the supplier excuse just doesn't wash.The new floor they ran in Belgium will be the legal one. They were warned prior to the summer break they needed to change the floor after a rules "clarification" from the FIA.
Can some one ban this troll?
Possibly. Although I still reckon Kimi will keep his seat for next year.
It's an opinion, hardly a fact. Just base the rating on how good a race was. Montreal 2012 was 10/10, but there was no reason why that couldn't take place in 2018, in theory.
Fair enough if you genuinely thought it was that good, but in my opinion while there was some decent racing the result was ultimately determined because a tyre started to break up, not because of great racing.